SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 3

Determination of Suitable Lands for Sugar Beet Cultivation Using GIS and FUCOM

Timuçin Everest(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3670-2114
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed model can be used under similar or different environmental conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the suitability of sugar beet lands using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, due to the limited number of crop-based land suitability studies on sugar beet cultivation in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted in the central and northern parts of the Karamenderes Plain, covering approximately 52,000 ha in NW Türkiye, where farmers have recently shifted to sugar beet cultivation for economic reasons but lack spatial decision-support tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed model can be used under similar or different environmental conditions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Site selection · FUCOM · Spatial analysis

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the suitability of sugar beet lands using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, due to the limited number of crop-based land suitability studies on sugar beet cultivation in the literature. The research was conducted in the central and northern parts of the Karamenderes Plain, covering approximately 52,000 ha in NW Türkiye, where farmers have recently shifted to sugar beet cultivation for economic reasons but lack spatial decision-support tools. In the study, eight soil and land characteristics were evaluated: soil texture, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), soil depth, organic carbon content, slope, drainage, and the Soil Fertility Index Score (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) (SFIS). The Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) was used to determine the weighted values of soil and land characteristics. Present assessments revealed that of the evaluated lands, 28047,50 ha was highly suitable, 21290,10 ha moderately suitable, 394,42 ha marginally suitable, and 2105,16 ha not suitable for sugar beet cultivation. The combined use of FUCOM and GIS to determine suitable land for sugar beet cultivation facilitated assessments and provided significant advantages in terms of time and economic aspects. In addition to identifying suitable areas for sugar beet cultivation, the findings provide a practical decision-support approach for land-use planning and agricultural policymaking by enabling more efficient, sustainable use of land resources. The proposed model can be used under similar or different environmental conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Everest, T. (2026). Determination of Suitable Lands for Sugar Beet Cultivation Using GIS and FUCOM. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 32 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1794266

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Abdullah A, Ahmad S, Athar M A, Rajpoot N & Talib F (2022). Healthcare performance management using integrated FUCOM-MARCOS approach: The case of India. Health Planning Manage 37(5):2635–2668. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3488 Akbari M, Meshram S G, Krishna R S, Pradhan B, Shadeed S, Khedher K M, Sepehri M, Ildoromi A R, Alimerzaei F & Darabi F (2021). Identification of the groundwater potential recharge zones using MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM), best worst method (BWM) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Water Resources Management 35(14): 4727–4745 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021 02924-1
  2. Alaboz P, Odabas M S & Dengiz O (2023). Soil quality assessment based on machine learning approach for cultivated lands in semi-humid environmental condition part of Black Sea region. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 69(15): 3514-3532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2248002
  3. Avcı S (1993). Geographical Principles of Sugar Beet Agriculture in Turkey. Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters, Department of Geography, Journal of Geography, (4) in Turkish. Badi I & Kridish M (2020). Landfill site selection using a novel FUCOM-CODAS model: A case study in Libya. Scientific African, 9:00537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00537
  4. Bagherzadeh A & Gholizadeh A (2016). Qualitative land suitability evaluation by parametric and fuzzy approaches for sugar beet crop in Sabzevar plain, northeast of Iran. Agricultural Research, 5(3): 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0210-1
  5. Biswas S, Pamucar D, Kar S & Sana S S (2021). A New Integrated FUCOM–CODAS Framework with Fermatean Fuzzy Information for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making. Symmetry 2021, 13(12): 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13122430
  6. Cao Q, Esangbedo M O, Bai S & Esangbedo C O (2019). Grey SWARA-FUCOM weighting method for contractor selection MCDM problem: A case study of floating solar panel energy system installation. Energies, 12(13): 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132481
  7. Dedeoğlu M & Dengiz O (2019). Generating of land suitability index for wheat with hybrid system aproach using AHP and GIS. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 167, 105062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105062
  8. Deegala D M B M, Abeysingha N S, Muthuwatta L P & Ray R L (2022). Sustainable growing areas for sugarcane in Sri Lanka under a changing climate. Sugar Tech, 24(6): 1801-1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01155-x
  9. Dornik A, Cheţan M A, Crişan T E, Heciko R, Gora A, Drăguţ L & Panagos P (2024). Geospatial evaluation of the agricultural suitability and land use compatibility in Europe's temperate continental climate region. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 12(4): 908 919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2024.01.002
  10. Ecer F (2021). An analysis of the factors affecting wind farm site selection through FUCOM subjective weighting method. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 27(1): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2020.93271
  11. El Baroudy A A (2016). Mapping and evaluating land suitability using a GIS-based model. Catena, 140, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.12.010
  12. Elkadeem M R, Younes A, Sharshir S W, Campana P E & Wang S (2021). Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis. Applied Energy, 295, 117071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117071
  13. El-Shafai A M A (2000). Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on yield and quality of sugar beet in Sohag. Egypr J. Agric. Res., 78(2): 759-767. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2000.322490
  14. Everest T (2015). Detailed soil survey and mapping with land evaluation of Troia Historical National Park Lands. Ph.D. thesis. Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Graduate School, p 203 in Turkish.
  15. Everest T (2021). Suitable site selection for pistachio (Pistacia vera) by using GIS and multi-criteria decision analyses (a case study in Turkey). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(5): 7686-7705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00941-5 Everest T & Gür E (2022). A GIS-based land evaluation model for peach cultivation by using AHP: a case study in NW Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(4): 241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09898-6
  16. Everest T, Sungur A & Özcan H (2022a). Applying the Best-Worst Method for land evaluation: a case study for paddy cultivation in northwest Turkey. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19: 3233–3246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03373-4
  17. Everest T, Koparan H, Sungur A & Özcan H (2022b). An important tool against combat climate change: Land suitability assessment for canola (a case study: Çanakkale, NW Turkey). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(11): 13137-13172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01985-x
  18. Everest T, Savaşkan G S, Or A & Özcan H (2024). Suitable site selection by using full consistency method (FUCOM): a case study for maize cultivation in northwest Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26(1): 1831–1850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022 02787-5
  19. FAO (2025). https://gaez.fao.org/pages/ecocrop-find-plant Beta vulgaris data sheet. Access date: 07 September 2025.
  20. FAO (2006). Guidelines for soil description, 4th edn. FAO, Rome
  21. Feizi F, Karbalaei-Ramezanali A A & Farhadi S (2021). FUCOM-MOORA and FUCOM-MOOSRA: New MCDM-based knowledge-driven procedures for mineral potential mapping in Greenfields. SN Applied Sciences, 3(3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04342-9
  22. Gemtos T A & Lellis T (1997). Effects of soil compaction, water and organic matter contents on emergence and initial plant growth of cotton and sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66(2): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1996.0126
  23. George H (2005). An overview of land evaluation and land use planning at FAO. FAO (ed.). Rome: FAO. Hajiboland R, Joudmand A & Fotouhi K (2009). Mild salinity improves sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) quality. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B–Soil and Plant Science, 59(4): 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710802154714
  24. Hlisnikovský L, Menšík L, Křížová K & Kunzová E (2021). The effect of farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers on sugar beet beetroot and top yield and soil chemical parameters. Agronomy, 11(1): 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010133
  25. Ismail A M A & El-Ghait R A (2004). Effect of balanced fertilization of NPK on yield and quality of sugar beet. Egypt J Agric Res. 82(2):717 729 https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2004.258178 Jones A, Montanarella L & Jones R (2005). Soil atlas of Europe (128-pp).
  26. Karaca S, Dengiz O, Turan İ D, Özkan B, Dedeoğlu M, Gülser F, Sargin B, Demirkaya S & Ay A (2021). An assessment of pasture soils quality based on multi-indicator weighting approaches in semi-arid ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107001
  27. Kaya N S & Dengiz O (2024). Assessment of the neutrosophic Fuzzy-AHP and predictive power of some machine learning approaches for maize silage soil quality. Comput Electron Agric. 226:109446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109446 Kaymaz I, Örücü Ö K & Arslan E S (2021). Landsenses ecology approach for comprehensive assessment of cultural ecosystem services: preferences of students at Ankara University of Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(7): 644 652. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1920515
  28. Koca Y K, Acar M, Turgut Y Ş, Dengiz O & Gencer M (2025). Site Suitability Assessment for Banana Cultivation by Integration with Fuzzy AHP and GIS Techniques. Applied Fruit Science, 67(4): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01437-0 Laufer D, Loibl B, Märländer B & Koch H J (2016). Soil erosion and surface runoff under strip tillage for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Central Europe. Soil and Tillage Research, 162, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.007
  29. Liu X, Tan Y, Dong J, Wu J, Wang X & Sun Z (2025). Assessing habitat selection parameters of Arabica coffee using BWM and BCM methods based on GIS. Scientific Reports, 15(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84073-0
  30. Mandere N M, Persson A, Anderberg S & Pilesjö P (2010). Tropical sugar beet land evaluation scheme: development, validation and application under Kenyan conditions. GeoJournal, 75(2): 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9302-9
  31. Mercan Ç (2025). GIS‐based FUCOM method for assessing land suitability for almond cultivation in Midyat, Southeastern Türkiye. Transactions in GIS, 29(5): e70109. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.70109
  32. Mercan Ç & Acıbuca V (2025). Utilizing FUCOM and AHP methods to identify the optimal beekeeping lands: A case study from Mardin, Türkiye. PLoS One, 20(11): e0335784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335784
  33. Moradi E, Mobasser H R, Mehraban A & Ganjali H R (2024). The agro-ecological capacity of north and central Sistan-Baluchestan Province, Iran, for canola cultivation determined by GIS and analytical hierarchical process. Applied Geomatics, 16(3): 529-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-024-00571-w
  34. Moslem S, Campisi T, Al-Rashid M A, Simic V, Esztergar-Kiss D & Pilla F (2024). Greening urban mobility: Assessing environmental and functional characteristics of bicycle infrastructure in the post-pandemic Era. Habitat International, 153, 103200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103200
  35. Mostafavi K (2012). Effect of salt stress on germination and early seedling growth stage of sugar beet cultivars. J Sustain Agric. 6: 120–5.
  36. Navidi M N, Seyedmohammadi J & McDowell R W (2022). A proposed new approach to identify limiting factors in assessing land suitability for sustainable land management. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(19): 2558-2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2072511
  37. OECD/FAO (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en
  38. Özkan B, Dengiz O & Demirağ Turan İ (2019). Site suitability assessment and mapping for rice cultivation using multi-criteria decision analysis based on fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS approaches under semihumid ecological condition in delta plain. Paddy and Water Environment, 17(4): 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-019-00692-8
  39. Özkan B, Dengiz O & Turan İ D (2020). Site suitability analysis for potential agricultural land with spatial fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis in regional scale under semi-arid terrestrial ecosystem. Scientific reports, 10(1): 22074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79105-4
  40. Pamučar D, Stević Ž & Sremac S (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry 10(9):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393
  41. Qu L, Shao Y & Zhang L (2013). Land suitability evaluation method based on GIS technology. In 2013 Second International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics) (pp. 7-12). IEEE. in semi-arid
  42. Sarğın B, Alaboz P, Karaca S & Dengiz O (2024). Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA weighting technique for soil quality modeling of cultivated land terrestrial ecosystems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 227: 109466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109466
  43. Shahbazi F, Jafarzadeh A A, Sarmadian F, Neyshabouri M R, Oustan S, Anaya Romero M & Rosa D D L (2009). Suitability of wheat, maize, sugar beet and potato using MicroLEIS DSS software in Ahar area, north-west of Iran. Journal of American and Environmental Science, 5(1): (2009), pp. 45-52 current trends and
  44. Sharma R, Kamble S S & Gunasekaran A (2018). Big GIS analytics framework for agriculture supply chains: A literature review identifying the future perspectives. Computers And Electronics in Agriculture, 155: 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.001
  45. Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. Chapter 3. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18
  46. Tercan E, Dengiz O, Özkan B, Dereli M A & Öztekin Y B (2022). Geographic information system–assisted site quality assessment for hazelnut cultivation using multi-criteria decision analysis in the Black Sea region, Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res, (29): 35908–35933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18127-5
  47. Tunçay T, Kılıç Ş, Dedeoğlu M, Dengiz O, Başkan O & Bayramin I (2021). Assessing soil fertility index based on remote sensing and GIS techniques with field validation in a semiarid agricultural ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environments, 190, 104525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104525
  48. TURKSTAT (2025). Turkish Statistical Institute, Crop production statistics, sugar beet production statistics https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr Access date: 24 November 2025
  49. Ulgen N & Yurtsever N (1995). The guide of fertilizer and fertilization for Turkey. Publishing Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Soil Water General Directorate in Turkish
  50. Ulutaş A & Karakuş C B (2021). Location selection for a textile manufacturing facility with GIS based on hybrid MCDM approach. Industria Textila, 72(2): 126–132. https://doi.org/10.35530/it.072.02.1736
  51. Uyan M, Janus J & Ertunç E (2023). Land use suitability model for grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivation using the best worst method: A case study from Ankara/Türkiye. Agriculture, 13(9): 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091722
  52. Vilček J & Torma S (2016). Characterization of soils in Slovakia for sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivation using geographic information systems (GIS). Sugar Tech, 18(5): 488-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0419-5
  53. Yener A, Özcan H, Everest T & Sungur A (2025). Remote Sensing-Driven FUCOM Approach for Identifying Suitable Peach Cultivation Sites. Applied Fruit Science, 67(3): 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01361-3
  54. Zakarya Y M, Metwaly M M, AbdelRahman M A, Metwalli M R & Koubouris G (2021). Optimized land use through integrated land suitability and GIS approach in West El-Minia Governorate, Upper Egypt. Sustainability, 13(21): 12236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112236
  55. Zhang J, Su Y, Wu J & Liang H (2015). GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in Shandong province of China. Comput Electron Agric, (114):202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.004
  56. Zhou Q, Ye C & Geng X (2024). A decision framework of offshore wind power station site selection using a MULTIMOORA method under pythagorean hesitant fuzzy environment. Ocean Engineering, 291, 116416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116416
  57. Abdullah A, Ahmad S, Athar M A, Rajpoot N & Talib F (2022). Healthcare performance management using integrated FUCOM-MARCOS approach: The case of India. Health Planning Manage 37(5):2635–2668. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3488 Akbari M, Meshram S G, Krishna R S, Pradhan B, Shadeed S, Khedher K M, Sepehri M, Ildoromi A R, Alimerzaei F & Darabi F (2021). Identification of the groundwater potential recharge zones using MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM), best worst method (BWM) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Water Resources Management 35(14): 4727–4745 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021 02924-1