Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 4

Inverse Scoring Approach in Evaluation of Irrigation System Performance of Water User Organizations

Didem Bedir(School of Graduate Studies)0000-0002-9858-1143
Murat Tekiner(Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi)0000-0002-4624-8496
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, considering the 7-year totals in the new scoring system developed according to various performance indicators, Küçüklü 1657, Umurbey 1297 and Troy 1250 scored inverse scorings, and it was determined that the most successful irrigation association was the Troy Irrigation Association.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The irrigation system performances of the Troy, Küçüklü and Umurbey Irrigation Associations located within the borders of Çanakkale province were evaluated with the newly developed inverse scoring approach by making use of the 7-year agricultural and economic indicators between 2011 and 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the evaluation, the highest and lowest 7 year average values of the five indicators and the 7-year total Inverse scorings obtained from these indicators were calculated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, considering the 7-year totals in the new scoring system developed according to various performance indicators, Küçüklü 1657, Umurbey 1297 and Troy 1250 scored inverse scorings, and it was determined that the most successful irrigation association was the Troy Irrigation Association.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Irrigation associations · Benchmarking · Agricultural efficiency and economic efficiency indicators

Abstract

The irrigation system performances of the Troy, Küçüklü and Umurbey Irrigation Associations located within the borders of Çanakkale province were evaluated with the newly developed inverse scoring approach by making use of the 7-year agricultural and economic indicators between 2011 and 2017. As a result of the evaluation, the highest and lowest 7 year average values of the five indicators and the 7-year total Inverse scorings obtained from these indicators were calculated. The highest irrigation ratio, which is one of the agricultural efficiency indicators, was realized in Umurbey (121 inverse scorings) with 82.7%, while the lowest irrigation ratio was realized in Küçüklü (542 inverse scorings) with 22.6%. Among the economic efficiency indicators, the highest average ratio of water fee collection performance was in Troy (231 inverse scorings) with 67.0%, while the average lowest ratio was in Küçüklü (375 inverse scorings) with 46.5%. The highest average value in the financial sufficiency ratio was calculated in Umurbey (339 inverse scorings) with 155%, while the lowest average value was calculated in Küçüklü (375 inverse scorings) with 107%. The highest average cost recovery ratio, which is another economic indicator, was determined in Umurbey (317 inverse scorings) with 89.8%, while the lowest average ratio was determined in Küçüklü (359 inverse scorings) with 48.7%. In the arrears collection efficiency, which was newly developed as an economic indicator in this study; showing how much of the water fee debts of the previous years were collected each year, the highest average was calculated in Umurbey with 75.5% (147 inverse scorings), while the lowest average ratio was in Troy with 28,6% (500 inverse scorings). Therefore, considering the 7-year totals in the new scoring system developed according to various performance indicators, Küçüklü 1657, Umurbey 1297 and Troy 1250 scored inverse scorings, and it was determined that the most successful irrigation association was the Troy Irrigation Association.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bedir, D., Tekiner, M. (2026). Inverse Scoring Approach in Evaluation of Irrigation System Performance of Water User Organizations. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 32 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1771859

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Arslan F, Córcoles Tendero J I, Rodríguez Díaz J A & Zema D A (2023). Comparison of Irrigation Management in Water User Associations of Italy, Spain and Turkey Using Benchmarking Techniques. Water Resour Manage 37: 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022 03355-2
  2. Beyribey M & Öğretir K (1997). Evaluation of System Performance in the Eskişehir State Hydraulic Works Irrigation Network. KHGM Eskişehir Research Institute, Research Reports. (In Turkish)
  3. Çakmak B, Polat H E, Kendirli B & Gökalp Z (2009). Evaluation of irrigation performance of Asartepe Irrigation Association: A case study from Turkey. Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Journal 22(1): 1-8
  4. Diker C (2018). Evaluation of Irrigation Associations in the Lower Seyhan Plain. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. (In Turkish)
  5. DSİ (2020). Irrigation Associations in the New Era as an Irrigation Management Model (Based on 2019 Activities). General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Department of Operation and Maintenance, Ankara. (In Turkish)
  6. Kalender M A (2017). Evaluation of Irrigation Performance in the Konya Ilgın Plain Pumping Irrigation Association. Selçuk University, Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. (In Turkish)
  7. Karcı A P & Uçar Y (2019). Use of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems in Irrigation Performance: A Case Study of Atabey Irrigation Scheme. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences 6(4): 624-635. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.633537
  8. Kartal S & Değirmenci H (2019). Evaluation of Irrigation Networks with Performance Indicators. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature., 22: 222-229. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.555094 (In Turkish)
  9. Malano H & Burton M (2001). Guidelines for Benchmarking Performance in the Irrigation and Drainage Sector. International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage, ISBN 92-5-104618-2.
  10. Mevzuat (2022). Law No. 6172 on Irrigation Associations. Access address: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr /MevzuatMetin/1.5.6172.pdf. (In Turkish)
  11. Muema F M, Home P G & Raude J M (2018). Application of Benchmarking and Principal Component Analysis in Measuring Performance of Public Irrigation Schemes in Kenya. Agriculture. 8(10):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8100162
  12. Nalbantoğlu G (2006). Comparative Evaluation of Irrigation Performance in Akıncı Irrigation Association. Ankara University, Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. (In Turkish)
  13. Özbek Ö, Kaman H & Ertürk E (2017). Evaluation of the performance of irrigation associations in Antalya Region-Aksu Plain. Mediterrenean Agricultural Sciences 30(1): 47-51. https://izlik.org/JA59TP92YP
  14. Özlü H (2004). Irrigation reform in Turkey. International Capacity Building Program on Participatory Irrigation Management. INPIM Training Module on Irrigation Reform in Turkey. 5–14 December 2004, IARTC, Menemen, Turkey
  15. Ramazani Moghaddam M R & Esmaeilian Y (2024). Improving Water Use Efficiency and Economic Benefits of Cropping System Through Intercropping in an Arid Climate. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 30(2): 293-303. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1251280
  16. Tahbaz S N, Koupahi M & Nazari M R (2010). Investigating on the performance of participatory irrigation management in Iran: case study Tajan water user association. Journal of Economics and agriculture Development 24(2): 205-216. https://sid.ir/paper/142072/en
  17. Tekiner M & Çakmak B (2012). Evaluation of Water Management Performance in Three Irrigation Associations Drawing Water from the Same Source. II. National Symposium on Irrigation and Agricultural Structures. İzmir pp. 411-418. (In Turkish)
  18. Tekiner M, Aktürk D & Arısoy H (2017). Performance Assessment with Economic Indicators for Small-Scale Irrigation Project of Konya. International Balkan and Near Eastern Social Sciences Congress Series IV, Russe, Bulgaria, 978-619-203-177.
  19. Tekiner M (2020). Evaluation of irrigation system performance of some irrigation associations that obtain water through pumping. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 7(4): 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.775509 (In Turkish)
  20. Torun E & Çakmak B (2024). Evaluation of water efficiency in agriculture: The case of the Konya closed basin. Irrigation and Drainage, 73(4): 1470-1482. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2972
  21. WWF (2022). Turkey's Water Risks Report 2014: World Water Forum Türkiye Publications. Access address:chrome extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ http://awsassets.wwftr.panda.org/downloads/turkiyenin_su_riskleri_raporu_web.pdf (In Turkish)