Journals / Veterinary Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Intercondylar width index of the tibia in the dogs: A morphological study

Seyyid Said Sabancı(MİLAS VETERİNER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2252-0114
Pages
102–107
Publication Date
2022-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study suggested performing further clinical studies to evaluate whether the difference in intercondylar width index among breeds in dogs is associated with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Morphological characteristics of the proximal tibia affect the orthopedic balance of the knee region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For these aims, the tibial bones of 84 dogs from 26 different breeds were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study suggested performing further clinical studies to evaluate whether the difference in intercondylar width index among breeds in dogs is associated with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dog · tibia · cranial cruciate ligament

Abstract

Morphological characteristics of the proximal tibia affect the orthopedic balance of the knee region. Such as the width of the condyles, tibial plateau angle, position of the patella; Intercondylar width is one of these features as well. The objectives of this study are to calculate the intercondylar width index of the tibia (ICWI) in dogs, to determine if there are gender-related differences in ICWI, and to compare the ICWI among the six breeds of dog. For these aims, the tibial bones of 84 dogs from 26 different breeds were used. The radiographs of tibias were taken, and the tibial plateau and intercondylar widths were measured. The intercondylar width index was calculated using the following formula: (intercondylar width/tibial plateau width) *100. The mean intercondylar width index of the dogs was 19.2±2.72. The index values of male and female dogs were 19.1±3.32 and 19.3±2.02, respectively. The significant differences in the index were not determined between male and female dogs, but the significant difference was determined among dogs’ breeds. The dogs in the high-risk breeds had significantly smaller eminence width index value than the dogs in the low-risk breeds related with the non-traumatic cranial cruciate ligament rupture. The results of this study suggested performing further clinical studies to evaluate whether the difference in intercondylar width index among breeds in dogs is associated with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sabancı, S. S. (2022). Intercondylar width index of the tibia in the dogs: A morphological study. Veterinary Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.24880/maeuvfd.1076011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Dye SF. An evolutionary perspective of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg. 1987;69:976-83.
  2. Gupte CM, Bull AM, Murray R, Amis AA. Comparative anatomy of the meniscofemoral ligament in humans and some domestic mammals. Anat Histol Embryol. 2007;36:47-52.
  3. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. The locomotor apparatus. In Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2002. p. 32-99.
  4. De Rooster H, De Bruin T, Van Bree H. Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments. Vet Surg. 2006;35:769-80.
  5. Arnoczky SP, Marshall JL. The cruciate ligaments of the canine stifle: an anatomical and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res. 1977;38:1807-14.
  6. Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: a primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983;183:456-59.
  7. Lopez MJ, Kunz D, Vanderby R, Heisey D, Bogdanske J, Markel MD. A comparison of joint stability between anterior cruciate intact and deficient knees: a new canine model of anterior cruciate ligament disruption. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:224-30.
  8. Tashman S, Anderst W, Kolowich P, Havstad S, Arnoczky S. Kinematics of the ACL-deficient canine knee during gait: serial changes over two years. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:931-41.
  9. Lewis BA, Allen DA, Henrikson TD, Lehenbauer TW. Computed tomographic evaluation of the canine intercondylar notch in normal and cruciate deficient stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2008;21:119-24.
  10. Griffon DJ. A review of the pathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease as a basis for future preventive strategies. Vet Surg. 2010;39:399–09.
  11. Macias C, McKee WM, May J. Caudal proximal tibial deformity and cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small-breed dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2002;43:433-38.
  12. Osmond CS, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OLA, Kidd LB. Morphometric assessment of the proximal portion of the tibia in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006;47:136-41.
  13. Talaat MB, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Combination tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cranial closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles with excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg. 2006;35:729-39.
  14. Mostafa AM, Griffon DJ, Thomas M, Constable PD. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limb of Labrador Retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Vet Res. 2009;70:498-07.
  15. Guerrer TG, Geyer H, Hassig M, Montavon PM. Effect of conformation of the distal portion of the femur and proximal portion of the tibia on the pathogenesis of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2007;68:1332-37.
  16. Boudrieau RJ. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement? Vet Surg. 2009;38:1-22.
  17. Inauen R, Koch D, Bass M, Haessig M. Tibial tuberosity conformation as a risk factor for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22:16-20.
  18. Renwick AIC, McKee, WM, Emmerson TD, House AK. Preliminary experiences of the triple tibial osteotomy procedure: tibial morphology and complications. J Small Anim Pract. 2009;50:212-21.
  19. Uhorchak JM, Scoville CR, Williams GN, Arciero RA, St.Pierre P, Taylor DC. Risk factors associated with noncontact injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective four-year evaluation of 859 West Point cadets. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:831-42.
  20. Witsberger TH, Villamil JA, Schultz L, Hahn, AW, Cook JL. Prevalence and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;232:1818-24.
  21. Tillman MD, Smith KR, Bauer JA, Cauraugh, JH, Falsetti A.B, Pattishall JL. Differences in three intercondylar notch geometry indices between males and females: a cadaver study. Knee. 2002;9:41-46.
  22. Hashemi J, Mansouri H, Chandrashekar N, Slauterbeck JR, Hardy DM, Beynnon BD. Age, sex, body anthropometry, and ACL size predict the structural properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:993-01.
  23. Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Bahr R, Beynnon BD, Demaio M, et al. Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A review of the Hunt Valley II Meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1512-32.
  24. Chandrashekar N, Slauterbeck J, Hashemi J. Sex-based differences in the anthropometric characteristics of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relation to intercondylar notch geometry: A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1492-98.
  25. Chandrashekar N, Mansouri H, Slauterbeck J, Hashemi J. Sex-based differences in the tensile properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech. 2006;39:2943-50.
  26. Dienst M, Schneider G, Altmeyer K, Voelkering K, Georg T, Kramann B, Kohn D. Correlation of intercondylar cross sections to the ACL size: A high resolution MR tomographic in vivo analysis. Arc Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 127:253-60.
  27. Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG, Baughan J, May C, Carter S. A reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1988;29:275-97.
  28. Charlton WPH, St.John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M. Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:329-33.
  29. Wolters F, Vrooijink SHA, Van Eck CF, Fu FH. Does notch size predict ACL insertion site size? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(1):17-21.
  30. Grierson J, Asher L, Grainger K. An investigation into risk factors for bilateral canine cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2011;24:192-96.
  31. Harasen GLG, A retrospective study of 165 cases of rupture of the canine cranial cruciate ligament. Can Vet J. 1995;36:250-51.
  32. Zeltzman PA, Pare B, Johnson GM, Zeltzman V, Robbins MA, Gendreau CL. Relationship between age and tibial plateau angle in dogs with cranial cruciate rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2005;41:117-20.
  33. Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Kinghor B.P, Macrossan PE, Cai W, Rothschild MF. Inheritance of rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in Newfoundlands. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006;228:61-64.
  34. Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993;203:1016-19.
  35. Duval JM., Budsberg SC, Flo GL, Sammarco JL. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med A. 1999;215:811-14.