AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightHowever, the presence of misleading content highlights the need for greater involvement from healthcare providers in creating accurate, patient-centered educational material on digital platforms.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, quality, and educational value of YouTube videos related to acute epididymitis, a common urological condition for which many individuals seek information online. Material And Methods: On May 15, 2025, a cross-sectional search was conducted on YouTube using the terms “acute epididymitis,” “epididymitis,” and “epididymo-orchitis.” To reduce algorithmic bias, the search was performed using incognito mode with a cleared history and a US-based VPN connection. The first 100 videos from each term were screened (total: 300). After applying exclusion criteria, 121 videos were included. Two reviewers independently assessed all videos. A third evaluator resolved disagreements. Video content was evaluated using three standardized tools: DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and JAMA benchmark criteria. Videos were categorized as either applicable or deceptive based on scientific accuracy and completeness. Results: Out of 121 videos, 85 (70.2%) were found to be useful. Videos uploaded by medical professionals and institutions had significantly higher quality scores across all evaluation tools. Helpful videos had a longer average duration compared to deceptive ones. Excellent inter-rater agreement was achieved for all scoring tools. No significant correlation was observed between the number of views or likes and the reliability of the video content. Conclusion: YouTube hosts a substantial number of high-quality videos on acute epididymitis, especially those produced by medical professionals. However, the presence of misleading content highlights the need for greater involvement from healthcare providers in creating accurate, patient-centered educational material on digital platforms.