Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2

İman Problemi ve Anlambilim

Pages
1–43
Publication Date
2004-08-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Merwardsa semantic method is put forward as analternatiye solitions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traditionists (Ashabu'I-Hadith)and theologians (AhIu'I-KaIam) particularly Maturidites and Asharitessistematically solved that problemaccording to their methods.In their solitions Ashabu'l-Hadithrationalistic methodwhich has a concrate charaetenstic;whereas, theologiansused a rationalistic methodwhich has an abstracı charactesistic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, both solitions appear to have some problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Merwardsa semantic method is put forward as analternatiye solitions
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:The Method of Ashabu'l-Hadith · Theological Method · Semantic Method

Abstract

The Problemculture. Traditionists (Ashabu'I-Hadith)and theologians (AhIu'I-KaIam) particularly Maturidites and Asharitessistematically solved that problemaccording to their methods.In their solitions Ashabu'l-Hadithrationalistic methodwhich has a concrate charaetenstic;whereas, theologiansused a rationalistic methodwhich has an abstracı charactesistic. However, both solitions appear to have some problems. In this paper, thesaid methods and their subsequent solitions are dealt with. Merwardsa semantic method is put forward as analternatiye solitions

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdem, H. S. (2004). İman Problemi ve Anlambilim. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000000198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...