SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Veterinary Journal of Kastamonu University / 2026 / Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Sustainable Poultry Meat Production Strategies: Balancing Environmental Impact and Animal Welfare

Ladine Baykal Çelik(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3352-9181
Claudia Plinz(Flensbur University)0009-0008-3648-9721
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review examines how the poultry meat production industry can significantly contribute to climate change by reducing its carbon footprint through environmentally friendly production techniques, and improve animal welfare, thereby contributing to long-term sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Poultry meat has a significant share in the animal protein demands of the increasing world population but it also has considerable environmental implications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sustainable poultry production strategies encompass the efficient use of natural resources and the minimization of environmental footprints and, improved animal welfare.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review examines how the poultry meat production industry can significantly contribute to climate change by reducing its carbon footprint through environmentally friendly production techniques, and improve animal welfare, thereby contributing to long-term sustainability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainability · Animal welfare · Gas emission

Abstract

Poultry meat has a significant share in the animal protein demands of the increasing world population but it also has considerable environmental implications. In the world, growing poultry production practices have raised concerns about environmental sustainability and animal welfare. Sustainable poultry production strategies encompass the efficient use of natural resources and the minimization of environmental footprints and, improved animal welfare. The key to sustainable poultry production is optimizing feed conversion ratios, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and responsibly managing water and land resources while maintaining animal welfare. In this review examines how the poultry meat production industry can significantly contribute to climate change by reducing its carbon footprint through environmentally friendly production techniques, and improve animal welfare, thereby contributing to long-term sustainability.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, L. B., Plinz, C. (2026). Sustainable Poultry Meat Production Strategies: Balancing Environmental Impact and Animal Welfare. Veterinary Journal of Kastamonu University, Volume: 5 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.61262/vetjku.1755100

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Abbasi, I. A., Shamim, A., Shad, M. K., Ashari, H., & Yusuf, I. (2024). Circular economy-based integrated farming system for indigenous chicken: Fostering food security and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140368
  2. Abdel-Wareth, A. A. A., Williams, A. N., Salahuddin, M., Gadekar, S., & Lohakare, J. (2024). Algae as an alternative source of protein in poultry diets for sustainable production and disease resistance: Present status and future considerations. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11, Article 1382163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1382163
  3. ADAS. (2018). Comparison of the regulatory and related cost implications of poultry meat production in the EU and USA. Prepared for AVEC. https://www.avec-poultry.eu/wp content/uploads/2018/06/Etude-ADAS-Final- Low-res.pdf
  4. Alabi, O. M., Olagunju, S. O., Aderemi, F. A., Lawal, T. E., Oguntunji, A. O., Ayoola, M. O., Oladejo, O. A., Adeleye, B. E., Adewumi, A. A., Alabi, B. D., & Tarta, A. (2024). Effect of litter management systems on incidence and severity of footpad dermatitis among broilers at finisher stage. Translational Animal Science, 8, txad145. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad145
  5. Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T., & Zechmeister- Boltenstern, S. (2006). Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112(2–3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030
  6. Anonymous. (2022, May 3). Eco-friendly approach to chicken manure valorization. The Poultry Site. https://www.thepoultrysite.com/articles/eco- friendly-approach-to-chicken-manure-valorisation
  7. Attia, Y. A., Aldhalmi, A. K., Youssef, I. M., Bovera, F., Tufarelli, V., Abd El-Hack, M. E., El-Kholy, K., & Shukry, M. (2024). Climate change and its effects on poultry industry and sustainability. Discover Sustainability, 5, 397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00627-2
  8. Bailie, C. L., & O’Connell, N. E. (2014). The effect of providing perches and string on activity levels and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. Animal, 8(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001961
  9. Bessei, W. (2006). Welfare of broilers: A review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933906001085
  10. Boakye-Yiadom, K. A., Ilari, A., Bisinella, V., & Duca, D. (2024). Environmental impact of poultry manure gasification technology for energy and ash valorization. Sustainability, 16(22), 9941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229941
  11. Center for Sustainable Systems. (2021). Social development indicators factsheet (Pub. No. CSS08-15). University of Michigan. De Jong, I. C., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevez, I. (2012a). Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. EFSA Supporting Publications, 9(2), 295E.
  12. De Jong, I. C., Van Harn, J., Gunnink, H., Hindle, V. A., & Lourens, A. (2012b). Footpad dermatitis in Dutch broiler flocks: Prevalence and factors of influence. Poultry Science, 91, 1569–1574.
  13. Estevez, I. (2007). Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poultry Science, 86(6), 1265– 1272. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1265
  14. FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2021–2030: Meat. https://www.fao.org/3/cb5332en/Meat.pdf
  15. FAO. (2023). Gateway to poultry production and products. https://www.fao.org/poultry-production- products/production/en/
  16. Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare: The science in its cultural context. Wiley-Blackwell. Gentile, N., Carrasquer, F., Marco-Fuertes, A., & Marin, C. (2024). Backyard poultry: Exploring non-intensive production systems. Poultry Science, 103(2), 103284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103284
  17. Gonzalez-Rivas, P. A., Chauhan, S. S., Ha, M., Fegan, N., Dunshea, F. R., & Warner, R. D. (2020). Effects of heat stress on animal physiology, metabolism, and meat quality: A review. Meat Science, 162, 108025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.108025
  18. Hartcher, K. M., & Lum, H. K. (2020). Genetic selection of broilers and welfare consequences: A review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 76(1), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2019.1680025
  19. Hettmannsperger, M. A., & Ruhnke, I. (2026). Manual catching and transportation of poultry with a focus on chickens and European practices. Poultry, 5, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry5020030
  20. Hunter, J. M., Anders, S. A., Crowe, T., Korver, D. R., & Bench, C. J. (2017). Practical assessment and management of foot pad dermatitis in commercial broiler chickens: A field study. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 26(4), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx019
  21. Juiputta, J., Chankitisakul, V., & Boonkum, W. (2023). Appropriate genetic approaches for heat tolerance and maintaining good productivity in tropical poultry production: A review. Veterinary Sciences, 10(10), 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100591
  22. Kiss, N. E., Tamás, J., Mannheim, V., & Nagy, A. (2023). Comparing the environmental impact of poultry manure and chemical fertilizers. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, Article 1237476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1237476
  23. Kwon, B. Y., Park, J., Kim, D. H., & Lee, K. W. (2024). Assessment of welfare problems in broilers: Focus on musculoskeletal problems associated with their rapid growth. Animals, 14(7), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071116
  24. Larney, F. J., & Hao, X. (2007). A review of composting as a management alternative for beef cattle feedlot manure in southern Alberta, Canada. Bioresource Technology, 98(17), 3221–3227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.005
  25. Liu, Z. L., Chen, Y., Xue, J. J., Huang, X. F., Chen, Z. P., Wang, Q. G., & Wang, C. (2022). Effects of ambient temperature on the growth performance, fat deposition, and intestinal morphology of geese from 28 to 49 days of age. Poultry Science, 101(5), 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101814
  26. MacLeod, M. J., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Tempio, G., Falcucci, A., & Opio, C. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from pig and chicken supply chains: A global life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  27. Mekonnen, M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. Ecosystems, 15, 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8
  28. Mench, J. A. (2008). Farm animal welfare in the U.S.A.: Farming practices, research, education, regulation, and assurance programs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 113(4), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.009
  29. Mottet, A., & Tempio, G. (2017). Global poultry production: Current state and future outlook and challenges. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 73(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071
  30. Nahm, K. H. (2003). Factors influencing nitrogen mineralization during poultry litter composting and calculations for available nitrogen. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 59(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030027
  31. Napolitano, F., Caporale, G., Carlucci, A., & Monteleone, E. (2010). Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(11), 4820–4826. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0095
  32. Ngongolo, K., & Mrimi, D. (2024). Climate change and poultry production: Enhancing resilience and sustainability through climate-smart practices, a review. Journal of Biological Researches, 30(3), 116–124.
  33. OECD. (2023). Feeding a net-zero world. Background paper prepared for the 44th Round Table on Sustainable Development, 8 September 2023. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/netwo rks/round-table-on-sustainable-development
  34. Poultry Extension Collaborative. (2020). Footpad dermatitis in poultry: A common issue in commercial and backyard flocks. Poultry Press.
  35. Preuss, N. B., & You, F. (2023). Comparative life cycle analysis of poultry manure management technologies. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 103, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET23103017
  36. Raj, A. B. M., & Gregory, N. G. (1996). Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs: 2. Stress of induction of anaesthesia. Research in Veterinary Science, 60(3), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(96)90074-9
  37. Rayner, A. C., Newberry, R. C., Vas, J., & Mullan, S. (2020). Slow-growing broilers are healthier and express more behavior indicative of positive welfare. Scientific Reports, 10, 15151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72087-x
  38. Rezaei, E. E., Webber, H., Asseng, S., Boote, K., Durand, J. L., Ewert, F., Martre, P., & MacCarthy, D. S. (2023). Climate change impacts on crop yields. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00491-0
  39. Rout, P. R., Pandey, D. S., Haynes-Parry, M., Briggs, C., Manuel, H. L. C., Umapathi, R., Mukherjee, S., Panigrahi, S., & Goel, M. (2023). Sustainable valorisation of animal manures via thermochemical conversion technologies: An inclusive review on recent trends. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 14, 553–582.
  40. Schuck-Paim, C., Negro-Calduch, E., & Alonso, W. J. (2021). Laying hen mortality in different indoor housing systems: A meta-analysis of data from commercial farms in 16 countries. Scientific Reports, 11, 3052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 021-81868-3
  41. Shapovalov, Y., Zhadan, S., Bochmann, G., Salyuk, A., & Nykyforov, V. (2020). Dry anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: A review. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7825. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217825
  42. Tallentire, C. W., Leinonen, I., & Kyriazakis, I. (2016). Breeding for efficiency in the broiler chicken: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016- 0398-2
  43. UN. (2022). The sustainable development goals report 2022. United Nations Publications. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The- Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf
  44. Van Boeckel, T. P., Brower, C., Gilbert, M., Grenfell, B. T., Levin, S. A., Robinson, T. P., & Laxminarayan, R. (2017). Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(15), E3463–E3471. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608319114
  45. Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., & Vantomme, P. (2013). Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security (FAO Forestry Paper No. 171). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  46. Vieira, F. M. C., Groff, P. M., Silva, I. J. O., Nazareno, A. C., Godoy, T. F., Coutinho, L. L., Vieira, A. M. C., & Silva-Miranda, K. O. (2019). Impact of exposure time to harsh environments on physiology, mortality, and thermal comfort of day-old chickens in a simulated condition of transport. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63(6), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01691-4
  47. Vitek, S., & Jacobs, L. A. (2026). Decade of evidence on broiler chicken dead-on-arrival rates and risk factors: A scoping review. Animals, 16, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050805
  48. Volkmann, N., Riedel, A., Kemper, N., & Spindler, B. (2024). Factors associated with footpad dermatitis in German laying hens: A retrospective study. Annals of Applied Biology, 185(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12923
  49. Voslarova, E., Janackova, B., Vitula, F., Kozak, A., & Vecerek, V. (2007). Mortality rates in broiler chickens during transport for slaughter. Poultry Science, 86(6), 1119–1125. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1119
  50. Weeks, C. A. (2014). Poultry handling and transport. In T. Grandin (Ed.), Livestock handling and transport (4th ed., pp. 378–398). CAB International.
  51. Yenilmez, F. (2025). The effect of climate change on chickens. In I. International Digital Agriculture Congress. https://www.indac.com.tr/index.php/TURSTEP/ar ticle/view/501
  52. Yuan, X., Li, S., Chen, J., Yu, H., Yang, T., Wang, C., Huang, S., Chen, H., & Ao, X. (2024). Impacts of global climate change on agricultural production: A comprehensive review. Agronomy, 14(7), 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071360
  53. Zhang, B., Fu, T., Guan, C.-Y., Cui, S., Fan, B., Tan, Y., Luo, W., Wei, Q., Li, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Environmental life cycle assessments of chicken manure compost using tobacco residue, mushroom bran, and biochar as additives. Sustainability, 14(9), 4976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094976
  54. Zhu, C., Kobayashi, K., Loladze, I., Zhu, J., Jiang, Q., Xu, X., Liu, G., Seneweera, S., Ebi, K. L., Drewnowski, A., Fukagawa, N. K., & Ziska, L. H. (2018). Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries. Science Advances, 4(5), eaaq1012.
  55. ADAS. (2018). Comparison of the regulatory and related cost implications of poultry meat production in the EU and USA. Prepared for AVEC. https://www.avec-poultry.eu/wp content/uploads/2018/06/Etude-ADAS-Final- Low-res.pdf