Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2

Depression, Social Phobia and Quality of Life after Major Lower Limb Amputation

Pages
168–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is important to provide permanent employment opportunities to improve the quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare the social phobia, depression and quality of life in patients with major lower limb amputation to non-amputated.Methods: Patients who were underwent above or below the knee amputation in the past were evaluated retrospectively by examining the hospital records.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All the participants were administered Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Short-Form 36 (SF-36).Results: The number of patients was 30 (21 males, nine females) in the amputated group and 30 (22 males, eight females) in the control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is important to provide permanent employment opportunities to improve the quality of life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare the social phobia, depression and quality of life in patients with major lower limb amputation to non-amputated.Methods: Patients who were underwent above or below the knee amputation in the past were evaluated retrospectively by examining the hospital records. All the participants were administered Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Short-Form 36 (SF-36).Results: The number of patients was 30 (21 males, nine females) in the amputated group and 30 (22 males, eight females) in the control group. The mean age was 41.8±14.09 years in the amputated group and 43.3±18.68 years in the control group. All LSAS and HADS scores were higher, and SF-36 scores were lower in the amputation group compared to the control group (p<0.05). The patients who were amputated more than five years ago had higher LSAS social fear scores, and lower HAD depression scores compared to patients less than five years (p=0.035, p=0.024, respectively). The employed patients had lower HAD depression and HAD total scores compared to unemployed patients (p=0.008, p=0,049, respectively). The patients amputated due to medical complications had higher scores in anxiety compared to the patients with traumatic amputation (p=0.005, p=0.016, respectively).Discussion and Conclusion: Social phobia, depression and poor quality of life are common problems in patients with major lower limb amputation. After five years, it should not be forgotten that social phobia will increase; depression will decrease along with its seriousness. Therefore, amputated patients should be psychiatrically counseled and treated. It is important to provide permanent employment opportunities to improve the quality of life.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAK, Y., ŞAHİN, İ., DEMİRTAŞ, A., AZBOY, İ., ÖZKUL, E., GEM, M., ADIYEKE, L. (2020). Depression, Social Phobia and Quality of Life after Major Lower Limb Amputation. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2, 168–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/162382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Mazurek M, Helmers S. Lower extremity amputations. In: Flynn JM (editor). Orthopaedic knowledge update 10. Philadelphia: AAOS, 2011: 537–45
  2. Toy PC. General principles of amputations. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (editors). Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Vol. 1, 12th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, Elsevier, 2013: 598–637
  3. Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:837–50
  4. Bodenheimer C, Kerrigan AJ, Garber SL, Monga TN. Sexuality in persons with lower extremity amputations. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:409–15
  5. Topçuoğlu V, Bez Y, Sahin Biçer D, Dib H, Kuşçu MK, Yazgan C, et al. Essansiyel Tremorda Sosyal Fobi. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2006;17:93–100
  6. Ferguson AD, Richie BS, Gomez MJ. Psychological factors af-ter traumatic amputation in landmine survivors: the bridge between physical healing and full recovery. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:931–8
  7. Dilbaz N. Liebowitz Sosyal Kaygı Ölçeği Geçerlilik ve Güvenilir-liği. Proceedings of the 37th National Congress of Psychiatry; İstanbul: Turkey; 2001; 132
  8. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–70
  9. Aydemir Ö. Hastane Anksiyete ve Depresyon Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1997;8:280–87
  10. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item se-lection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83
  11. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Kısa Form 36 (KF-36)’nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102–6
  12. Rybarczyk B, Behel J, Szymanski L. Limb amputation. In: Frank RG, Rosethan M, Caplan B (editors). Handbook of Rehabilita-tion Psychology. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psycho-logical Association, 2010: 29–42
  13. Dunn DS. Social psychological issues in disability. In: Frank RG, Rosethan M, Caplan B (editors). Handbook of Rehabilitation Psychology. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2010: 379–90
  14. Gething L. Generality vs. specificity of attitudes towards peo-ple with disabilities. Br J Med Psychol 1991;64:55–64
  15. Dziadosz DR, Bergmann KA. Lower extremity amputations. In: Cannada LK (editor). Orthopaedic knowledge update 11. Rosemont: AAOS, 2014: 659–75
  16. Williams RM, Ehde DM, Smith DG, Czerniecki JM, Hoffman AJ, Robinson LR. A two-year longitudinal study of social support following amputation. Disabil Rehabil 20