Journals / Uluslararası Gıda Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Determination of Productivity Status of Agricultural Lands in Solhan District of Bingöl Province

Veysel Alp(Harran Üniversitesi)0000-0001-7880-9879
Ali Rıza Demirkıran(BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0086-0137
Pages
22–29
Publication Date
2025-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The precipitation pattern in Bingöl reflects a continental climate, but the region's overall climatic conditions exhibit a unique blend of Mediterranean and continental influences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study focuses on Solhan's agricultural lands, situated within the boundaries of Bingöl Province.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bingöl is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region, spanning latitudes 41°20' to 39°54' north and longitudes 38°27' to 40°27' east.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The precipitation pattern in Bingöl reflects a continental climate, but the region's overall climatic conditions exhibit a unique blend of Mediterranean and continental influences.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organic matter · Fertility · Soil parameters

Abstract

The study focuses on Solhan's agricultural lands, situated within the boundaries of Bingöl Province. Bingöl is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region, spanning latitudes 41°20' to 39°54' north and longitudes 38°27' to 40°27' east. The province covers a total area of 8,253 km², with the central district occupying 1,790 km². Bingöl shares borders with Diyarbakır to the south, Muş to the east, Tunceli and Elazığ to the west, and Erzincan and Erzurum to the north. Solhan, a district of Bingöl, is adjacent to Muş on its eastern side. The precipitation pattern in Bingöl reflects a continental climate, but the region's overall climatic conditions exhibit a unique blend of Mediterranean and continental influences. This study aimed to assess the productivity levels of agricultural lands in Solhan. For this purpose, 130 soil samples were collected from the top 0-30 cm layer across 13 villages in the Solhan district where farming activities are prevalent. These samples were analyzed for various parameters, including texture, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium carbonate (%CaCO₃) content, and essential plant nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu). The analysis revealed that the soils were non-saline, low in lime content, and deficient in organic matter, with a near-neutral pH. Potassium levels were found to be high, while phosphorus levels were moderate in 60% of the samples. Zinc levels were sufficient in 65% of the samples, manganese levels were adequate, and there was no iron deficiency. Copper levels were also determined to be sufficient. The soil texture of the agricultural lands was predominantly clay-loam and loam.

Özet

The study focuses on Solhan's agricultural lands, situated within the boundaries of Bingöl Province. Bingöl is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region, spanning latitudes 41°20' to 39°54' north and longitudes 38°27' to 40°27' east. The province covers a total area of 8,253 km², with the central district occupying 1,790 km². Bingöl shares borders with Diyarbakır to the south, Muş to the east, Tunceli and Elazığ to the west, and Erzincan and Erzurum to the north. Solhan, a district of Bingöl, is adjacent to Muş on its eastern side. The precipitation pattern in Bingöl reflects a continental climate, but the region's overall climatic conditions exhibit a unique blend of Mediterranean and continental influences. This study aimed to assess the productivity levels of agricultural lands in Solhan. For this purpose, 130 soil samples were collected from the top 0-30 cm layer across 13 villages in the Solhan district where farming activities are prevalent. These samples were analyzed for various parameters, including texture, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium carbonate (%CaCO₃) content, and essential plant nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu). The analysis revealed that the soils were non-saline, low in lime content, and deficient in organic matter, with a near-neutral pH. Potassium levels were found to be high, while phosphorus levels were moderate in 60% of the samples. Zinc levels were sufficient in 65% of the samples, manganese levels were adequate, and there was no iron deficiency. Copper levels were also determined to be sufficient. The soil texture of the agricultural lands was predominantly clay-loam and loam.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alp, V., Demirkıran, A. R. (2025). Determination of Productivity Status of Agricultural Lands in Solhan District of Bingöl Province. Uluslararası Gıda Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 22–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/1623458

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Cangir, C. (1994). Agricultural production direction and land use, our land assets, basic problems of our lands and strategic approaches to the use of our lands. Agriculture Week 94th Symposium, Ankara, Turkey, pp. 94-95.
  2. Demirkıran, A.R., Özbay, N., & Demir, Y. (2012). Effects of Leonardite and inorganic fertilization on tomato plant development. Tr. Nature and Science Journal, 1(2): 110-114.
  3. Erdal, I., Boydak, C. (2011). Comparison of DTPA and EDTA test methods in determining the plant-available iron content of cherry orchard soils in Isparta region. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 6(1), 22-27.
  4. Göl, C. (2002). Relationships between land use types and some soil properties in Çankırı Eldivan region. Ankara University, Institute of Science, PhD Thesis, Ankara.
  5. Günal, H., Akbaş, F., Özgöz, E., Ünlükara, A., Yıldız, H., Kurunç, A., Çetin, M., Erşahin, S. (2008). Creation of the current database required for sustainable agricultural production in Kazova. Tübitak Project, Project No 105O607, Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Tokat, p. 71.
  6. Kwiatowski, J. (1998). Salinity classification. Mapping and Managment in Alberta, Edmonton, Canada s. 213-215. Lindsay, W.L., Norwell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese, and Copper. Soil Science Society of america Journal, 42(3): 421-428.
  7. Rhoades, J., Chanduvi, D., & Lesch, S.F. (1999). Soil salinity assessment methods and ınterpretation of electrical conductivity measurement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, USA, s. 57.
  8. Richards, L.A., Allison, L.E., Brown, J.V., Hayward, H.E., Berntesin, L., Fireman, M., Pearson, G.A., Wilcox, L.V., Bower, C.A., Hatcher, J.T., Reeve, R.C. (1954). Diagnosis and ımprovement of saline and alkali soils, Agriculture Hand book, USA, s. 79.
  9. Saglam, T. (2012). Chemical analysis methods of soil and water. Tekirdag: Namık Kemal University Faculty of Agriculture. No.189 Textbook No.2.
  10. Saglam, T., Bahtiyar, M., Cangir, C., Tok, H.A. (1993). Soil Science. Trakya University Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture 1: 17-23.
  11. Ulgen, N., Yurtsever, N. (1995). Turkey fertilizer and fertilization guide. Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry General Directorate of Rural Services Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, p. 209.