Journals / Çocuk Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Practice in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study

Çocuk Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde İnvaziv Olmayan Mekanik Ventilasyon Uygulanan Hastaların Geriye Dönük Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
62–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prospective controlled studies investigating factors affecting NIV success in specific patient groups and indications are required.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: To investigate demographic, clinical and laboratory features and to determine the indications for non-invasive ventilation (NIV), ventilation parameters and NIV success among patients who received NIV therapy at Ondokuz Mayıs University Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Medical records of 61 patients who received NIV therapy at Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine Pediatric Intensive Care Unit between March 1, 2015-June 1, 2016 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prospective controlled studies investigating factors affecting NIV success in specific patient groups and indications are required.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate demographic, clinical and laboratory features and to determine the indications for non-invasive ventilation (NIV), ventilation parameters and NIV success among patients who received NIV therapy at Ondokuz Mayıs University Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Methods: Medical records of 61 patients who received NIV therapy at Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine Pediatric Intensive Care Unit between March 1, 2015-June 1, 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age of the patients was 14 (2.5-180) months and 31 patients (50.8%) were male. Forty-eight patients (78.7%) had a comorbid disease. The most common indication for NIV was acute respiratory failure followed by NIV as weaning mode or rescue therapy. NIV application was made with bilevel positive air pressure (BIPAP) in 77% and with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in 23% of the patients. Full face mask was used in 89.4% of patients who received BIPAP. Complication occurred in three patients (4.9%) during NIV therapy. NIV success rate was found to be 60.6%. No statistically significant difference was found between NIV-responsive and unresponsive group in terms of demographic features, clinical and laboratory findings, NIV indications and type. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that NIV might reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and it can be used safely as weaning mode in pediatric patients. In our study, demographicclinical features and NIV application methods had no effect on NIV success. Oral or enteral feeding maintenance rate was found to be higher in HFNC group than in BIPAP group. Prospective controlled studies investigating factors affecting NIV success in specific patient groups and indications are required.

Özet

Amaç: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi'nde (ÇYBÜ) invaziv olmayan ventilasyon (İOV) uygulanan hastaların demografik, klinik ve laboratuvar özellikleri ile İOV endikasyonları, ventilasyon parametreleri ve İOV başarısı başta olmak üzere hasta sonuçlarının geriye dönük olarak incelenmesidir.Yöntemler: 1 Mart 2015-1 Haziran 2016 tarihleri arasında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, ÇYBÜ'de İOV uygulanan 61 hastanın tıbbi kayıtları geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan hastaların 31'i (%50,8) erkekti ve ortanca yaş 14 ay idi. Kırk sekiz (%78,7) hasta komorbid bir hastalığa sahipti. En sık İOV endikasyonu akut solunum yetmezliği idi. Bunu invaziv mekanik ventilasyondan ayırma sırasında weaning modu ya da kurtarma tedavisi olarak İOV uygulaması izlemişti. Hastaların %77'sine bilevel pozitif havayolu basıncı (BPHB) ile %23'üne yüksek akışlı nazal oksijen (YANO) ile İOV uygulaması yapılmıştı. BPHB uygulanan hastaların %89,4'ünde İOV uygulaması tam yüz maskesi ile yapılmıştı. İOV uygulaması boyunca toplam üç hastada (%4,9) komplikasyon gelişmişti. Çalışmamızda İOV başarı oranı %60,6 olarak saptandı. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, klinik ve laboratuvar bulguları, İOV endikasyonu ve uygulama yöntemi yönünden başarılı ve başarısız olan gruplar arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçları pediyatrik hastalarda İOV'un invaziv mekanik ventilasyon gereksinimini azaltabileceğini ve mekanik ventilasyondan ayırmada weaning modu olarak güvenli bir şekilde kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir. Çalışmamızda hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ile İOV uygulama yöntemlerinin, İOV başarısı üzerine etkili bulunmamıştır. Oral veya enteral beslenmenin sürdürülme oranı YANO uygulanan grupta BPHB uygulanan gruba göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Spesifik hasta grupları ve endikasyonlarda İOV başarısını etkileyen faktörlerin araştırıldığı prospektif kontrollü çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMEL, Ö. K., PAKSU, M. Ş., YENER, N., KAPLAN, E. M. (2016). Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Practice in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study. Çocuk Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 62–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/162315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Xu R, Lian Y, Li WX. Airway Complications during and after General Anesthesia: A Comparison, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Using Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airways and Endotracheal Tubes. PLoS One. 2016;11:0158137. Meeder AM, Tjan DH, van Zanten AR. Noninvasive and invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients: a comparative cohort study. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:813-25. Hull J. The value of non-invasive ventilation. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99:1050-4.
  2. Thill PJ, McGuire JK, Baden HP, Green TP, Checchia PA. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in children with lower airway obstruction. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5:337-42.
  3. Larrar S, Essouri S, Durand P, Chevret L, Haas V, et al. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in infants with severe acute bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr. 2006;13:1397-403.
  4. Padman R, Lawless ST, Kettrick RG. Noninvasive ventilation via bilevel positive airway pressure support in pediatric practice. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:169-73.
  5. Yaman A, Kendirli T, Ödek Ç, Ateş C, Taşyapar N, et al. Efficacy of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in prevention of intubation and reintubation in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2016;32:175-81. Yañez LJ, Yunge M, Emilfork M, Lapadula M, Alcántara A, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of noninvasive ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:484-9.
  6. Wing R, Janes C, Maranda LS, Armsby CC. Use of high-flow nasal cannula support in the emergency department reduces the need for intubation in pediatric acute respiratory insufficiency. Pediatr Emer Care. 2012;28:1117-23.
  7. Bernet V, Hug MI, Frey B. Predictive factors for the success of noninvasive mask ventilation in infants and children with acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:660-4.
  8. James CS, Hallewell CP, James DP, Wade A, Mok QQ. Predicting the success of non-invasive ventilation in preventing intubation and re- intubation in the paediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1994-2001.
  9. Calderini E, Chidini G, Pelosi P. What are the current indications for noninvasive ventilation in children? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:368-74. Milési C, Boubal M, Jacquot A, Baleine J, Durand S, et al. High-flow nasal cannula: recommendations for daily practice in pediatrics. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:29. Riese J, Fierce J, Riese A, Alverson BK. Effect of a Hospital-wide High- Flow Nasal Cannula