SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Kadın ve Aile Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

A Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published on the Family in the Field of Social Sciences: Author-, Institution-, and Period-Based Studies in the Context of Türkiye

Sosyal Bilimler Alanında Aile Konusunda Yayımlanmış Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi : Türkiye Özelinde Yazar, Kurum ve Dönemsel Araştırmalar

Muhammet Ünal Arvas(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5530-7144
Pages
71–100
Publication Date
2026-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the period-based analysis provide valuable data for researchers focusing on family studies as well as for policy-making institutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid development of industry and technology has influenced family structures, transforming the patriarchal family model into a more individual-oriented family structure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, the main objective of this study is to evaluate scientific performance in Türkiye by analyzing the bibliographic data of articles related to family studies published in the field of social sciences and to identify period-specific research topics through keyword analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the period-based analysis provide valuable data for researchers focusing on family studies as well as for policy-making institutions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aile · Aile Yapısı · Bibliyometri

Abstract

The rapid development of industry and technology has influenced family structures, transforming the patriarchal family model into a more individual-oriented family structure. This transformation has become a subject of research in many different fields, including social, economic, cultural, and health-related studies. Bibliometric analysis methods, which enable the quantitative analysis of scientific publications, are used to reveal the existing intellectual accumulation of a particular topic, author, or institution by analyzing published works, as well as to identify and evaluate relationships among sources. Accordingly, the main objective of this study is to evaluate scientific performance in Türkiye by analyzing the bibliographic data of articles related to family studies published in the field of social sciences and to identify period-specific research topics through keyword analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that the performance of Turkish scholars and academic institutions is characterized by a high level of inter-author and inter-institutional collaboration. The period-based analysis reveals that studies conducted before 2000 primarily focused on issues related to independence and selfhood; research between 2000 and 2014 emphasized working life; studies from 2015 to 2019 concentrated on gender and working life; and research conducted between 2020 and 2024 addressed a wide range of topics, including working life, social, economic, and medical issues within the social sciences. The findings of the period-based analysis provide valuable data for researchers focusing on family studies as well as for policy-making institutions.

Özet

Sanayii ve teknolojinin hızlı gelişimi aile yapısını etkilemiş ve ataerkil aile yapısını bireysel aile yapısına evirmiştir. Yaşanan bu değişim sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel, sağlık gibi birçok farklı alanda araştırma konusu olmuştur. Bilimsel yayınların niceliksel olarak analiz edilmesini sağlayan bibliyometrik analiz yöntemleri bir konunun, yazarın, kurumun üretmiş olduğu yayınları analiz ederek mevcut entellektül birikimi ortaya koymak, kaynaklar arasındaki ilişkileri çıkarmak ve değerlendirmek için başvurulan yöntemlerdir. Bu doğrultuda bu çalışmanın temel amacı sosyal bilimler alanında aile ile ilgili yayımlanan makalelerin bibliyografik verilerini analiz ederek Türkiye özelinde bilimsel performansı değerlendirmek ve anahtar terim analizi ile dönemsel araştırma konularını tespit etmek olarak belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda Türkiye’nin bilim insanlarının ve akademik kurumların performansının yazarlararası işbirliği ve kurumlararası iş birliği çalışmalarının yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Dönemsel analiz sonucunda 2000 öncesi araştırmaların bağımsızlık ve benlik ile ilgili konuları, 2000-2014 arası ikinci dönemde iş hayatı, 2015-2019 arası üçüncü dönemde cinsiyet ve çalışma hayatı, 2020-2024 arası dönemde ise çalışma hayatı, sosyal, ekonomik ve tıp gibi birçok konunun sosyal bilimlerde araştırıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Dönemsel analiz verileri aile konusunda çalışma yapacak bilim insanlarına, politika geliştiren kurumlara bilgi sağlaması açısından yararlı veri sunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

Arvas, M. Ü. (2026). A Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published on the Family in the Field of Social Sciences: Author-, Institution-, and Period-Based Studies in the Context of Türkiye. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Kadın ve Aile Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 71–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/1620217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Arkar, H. & Eker, D. (1992). Influence of Having a Hospitalized Mentally-ill Member in The Family on Attitudes Toward Mental-Patients in Turkey, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 27(3), 151-155.
  2. Broadus, R. N. (1987), Toward a Definition of “Bibliometrics”, Scientometrics, 12(5–6). 373-379.
  3. Bulut, A. & Turan, J. (1995). Postpartum Family-Planning and Health Needs of Women of Low-Income in İstanbul, Studies in Family Planning, 26(2). 88-100, https://doi.org/10.2307/2137934.
  4. Çakır, H. V., Fabricant, S. J., & Kırcalıoğlu, F. N. (1996). Comparative Costs of Family Planning Services and Hospital- Based Maternity Care in Turkey, Studies in Family Planning, 27(5), 269-276, https://doi.org/10.2307/2137998.
  5. Cetindamar, D., Gupta, V. K., Karadeniz, E. E., & Eğrican, N. (2012). What the numbers tell: The impact of human, family and financial capital on women and men’s entry into entrepreneurship in Turkey, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(1-2), 29-51. Doi: 10.1080/08985626.2012.637348.
  6. Dikeçligil, F. B., (2012). Aileye Dair Kabullerin Ezber Bozumu, Muhafazakâr Düşünce Dergisi, 8(31), 21-52.
  7. Donato, S., Brugnera, A., Adorni, R., Molgora, S., Reverberi, E., Manzi, C., Angeli, M., Bagirova, A., Benet-Martinez, V., Camilleri, L., Camilleri-Cassar, F., Kazasi, E. H., Meil, G., Symeonaki, M., Aksu, A., Batthyany, K., Brazienė, R.,
  8. Genta, N., Masselot, A., & Morrissey, S. (2023). Workers’ Individual and Dyadic Coping With The COVID-19 Health Emergency: A Cross Cultural Study, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(2). 551-575, https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221119066.
  9. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Marc, W. (2021). Lim How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines, Journal of International Marketing, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2021.04.070.
  10. Duben, A. (1985). Turkish Families and Households in Historical-Perspective, Journal of Family History, 10(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/036319908501000105.
  11. Duben, A. (1990). Understanding Muslim Households and Families in Late Ottoman İstanbul, Journal of Family History, 15(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/036319909001500104.
  12. Duman, M. Z. (2021). Üniversitede Okuyan Z Kuşağının Değişen Aile Algısı ve Aile İçi İlişkilerde Yaşadığı Sorunlar, Sosyolojik Bağlam Dergisi, 2(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.52108/2757-5942.2.1.2.
  13. Erdal, L. (2014). Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika ve Koruyucu Aile Hizmet Modeli, Sosyoekonomi, 22(22). https://doi. org/10.17233/se.27202.
  14. Ener, J. (1979). Counseling in Relation to Changing and Different Family Structures in Turkey, International Journal for The Advancement of Counselling, 2(3), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355009.
  15. Feng, L., Zhang, X., Zhong, H., & Zhang, W. (2025). Relationships and mediating mechanisms between university teachers’ marital relationship, work values, and social support on job satisfaction Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1665141.
  16. Fişek, G. O. (1991). A Cross-Cultural Examination of Proximity and Hierarchy as Dimensions of Family-Structure, Family Process, 30(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00121.x
  17. Fişek, N. H. (1974). Integrated Health-Family Planning Program in Etimesgut-District, Turkey, Studies in Family Planning, 5(7), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964784.
  18. Fişek, N. H. & Sümbüloğlu, K. (1978). Effects of Husband and Wife Education on Family-Planning in Rural Turkey, Studies in Family Planning, 9(10-1), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/1965765.
  19. Hortaçsu, N. (1997). Family- and Couple-Initiated Marriages in Turkey, Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 123(3). 325-342,
  20. Hortaçsu, N. (1999). The First Year of Family- and Couple-Initiated Marriages of a Turkish Sample: A Longitudinal Investigation, International Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075999400087.
  21. Hortaçsu, N., Ertem, L., Kurtoglu, H., and Uzer, B. (1990). Family Background and Individual Measures as Predictors of Turkish Primary-School Childrens Academic-Achievement, Journal of Psychology, 124(5), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1990.10543246.
  22. Hortaçsu, N., Gencoz, T., and Oral, A. (1995). Perceived Functions of Family and Friends During Childhood, Adolescence, and Youth—Developmental Theories of 2 Turkish groups, International Journal of Psychology, 30(5), 591-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599508246588.
  23. Hortaçsu, N., and Oral, A. (1994). Comparison of Couple-Initiated and Family-Initiated Marriages in Turkey, Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 229-239, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711386.
  24. Hortaçsu, N., & Üner, H. (1993). Family Background, Sociometric Peer Nominations, and Perceived Control as Predictors of Academic-Achievement, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154(4), 425-431, https://doi.org/10.1080 /00221325.1993.9914741.
  25. Iliescu, A.N. (2024). Green Knowledge Management Bibliometric Analysis, Encyclopedia, 4(2), 923-935. https://doi. org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020060.
  26. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The Autonomous-Relational Self: A New Synthesis, European Psychologist, 1(3), 180-186. Doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180.
  27. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1999). The Model of Family Change: A Rejoinder, International Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 15-17.https://doi.org/10.1080/002075999400069.
  28. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. & Ataca B. (2005). Value of Children and Family Change: A Three-Decade Portrait From Turkey, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (3), 317–337. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00213.x.
  29. Karatepe, O. M. (2013). The Effects of Work Overload and Work-Family Conflict on Job Embeddedness and Job Performance The Mediation of Emotional Exhaustion, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(4), 614-634. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111311322952.
  30. Karatepe, O. M., & Karadaş, G. (2014). The Effect Of Psychological Capital On Conflicts in The Work-Family Interface, Turnover And Absence İntentions, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Volume: 43, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.09.005.
  31. Karatepe, O. M., & Kılıç H. (2007). Relationships of supervisor support and conflicts in the work-family interface with the selected job outcomes of frontline employees, Tourism Management, 28(1), 238-252. Doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.019.
  32. Karatepe, O. M., & Sökmen (2006). The effects of work role and family role variables on psychological and behavioral outcomes of frontline employees, Tourism Management, 27(2), 255-268. Doi: 10.1016/j.tourman. 2004.10.001.
  33. Ko, A. et al. (2000). Family Matters: Rethinking The Psychology of Human Social Motivation, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 173-201, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619872986.
  34. Koptagelilal, G. (1980). Psychosocial Problems of The Family in a Society in Transition—The Turkish Example, Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 16(1-2), 146-156.
  35. Krys, K. et al. (2000). Personal Life Satisfaction as a Measure Of Societal Happiness is an Individualistic Presumption: Evidence From Fifty Countries, Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2197-2214. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00311-y.
  36. Krys, K. et al. (2023). Family First: Evidence of Consistency And Variation in The Value of Family Versus Personal Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(3), 323-339. https://doi. org/10.1177/0022022122113.
  37. Lecompte, W. & Lecompte, G. (1973). Generational Attribution in Turkish and American Youth—Study of Social Norms Involving Family, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(2), 175-187. https://doi. org/10.1177/002202217300400203.
  38. Li, L. M. V. (2024). The Role of Cultural Heterogeneity in Strengthening The Link Between Family Relationships And Life Satisfaction in 50 Societies, Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(6), 1-25. DOI10.1007/s10902-024-00768-1.
  39. Onkal, D., and Erel, E. (1992). Management Information Systems in Family Planning: Experience of a Developing Country, International Forum on Information and Documentation, 17(3), 20-24.
  40. Özcan, F. (1997). Family Planning in Isparta, Turkey, Journal of Biosocial Science, 29(4), 509-510. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0021932097005099.
  41. Phung, P.T., Luu, N.T.M., Nguyen, A.T.V., Siriwardana, A. and Halibas, A. (2024). A Bibliometric Perspective: Three Stages of Green Knowledge Management Thematic Evolution in Business Literature, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi. org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2024-0079.
  42. Pritchart, A. (1969), Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?, Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. Roskam, I et al. (2022). Gender Equality and Maternal Burnout: A 40-Country Study, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211072813.
  43. Seiffge-Krenke, I. et al. (2019). Psychopathology in Adolescents From Seven Countries: What Role Does Controlling Identity Development And Family Relationships Play?, Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 47(5), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a000633.
  44. Sorokowski, P., Randall, A. K., Groyecka, A., Frackowiak, T., Cantarero, K., Hilpert, P., Ahmadi, K., Alghraibeh, A. M., Aryeetey, R., Bertoni, A., Bettache, K., Błażejewska, M., Bodenmann, G., Bortolini, T. S., Bosc, C., Butovskaya, M., Castro, F. N., Cetinkaya, H., Cunha, D., David, D., … Sorokowska, A. (2017). Marital Satisfaction, Sex, Age, Marriage Duration, Religion, Number of Children, Economic Status, Education, and Collectivistic Values: Data from 33 Countries, Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01199.
  45. Türk Dil Kurumu (2022). Genel Türkçe Sözlük, https://sozluk.gov.tr/?ara=aile adresinden 21.05.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır. Ulhaq, I., Nayak, R., George, M., Nguyen, H. and Quang, H. (2024). Green Knowledge Management: A Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trends and Future Directions, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge OKAD, 2026, Cilt 6, Sayı 1, Sayfa: 71-100.
  46. Management Systems, Volume: ahead-of-print Issue: ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS- 02-2024-0069. Uluğtekin, S. (1989). Family Background and Resocialization of Turkish Delinquents, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X8903300104.
  47. Yang, J., Lv, X., Xie, P., & Ming, X. (2026). Juggling tasks, delaying duties: Understanding the link between daily multitasking and procrastination in hotel employees, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 133, 104498. DOI10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104498.