Journals / Journal of Business and Trade / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

In Turkey Macroeconomic Determinants of Sustainable Development: An ARDL Based Empirical Analysis (1990–2022)

Türkiye'de Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmanın Makroekonomik Belirleyicileri: ARDL Tabanlı Ampirik Bir Analiz (1990–2022)

Muhammed Emin Arkan(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0008-1946-3992
Pages
36–57
Publication Date
2026-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, these findings suggest that population dynamics support sustainable development in Türkiye through human capital channels in both the short and long run; however, the prevailing growth model appears to be at odds with long-run sustainable development objectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sustainable development has emerged as a critical area of inquiry in recent years, attracting growing scholarly attention in the context of global economic transformation and environmental sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines the short- and long-run effects of population growth, economic growth, energy intensity, and trade openness on the Sustainable Development Index (SDI) in Türkiye using annual data covering the period 1990–2022 within an ARDL cointegration framework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, these findings suggest that population dynamics support sustainable development in Türkiye through human capital channels in both the short and long run; however, the prevailing growth model appears to be at odds with long-run sustainable development objectives.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma · Nüfus Artışı · Ekonomik Büyüme

Abstract

Sustainable development has emerged as a critical area of inquiry in recent years, attracting growing scholarly attention in the context of global economic transformation and environmental sustainability. This study examines the short- and long-run effects of population growth, economic growth, energy intensity, and trade openness on the Sustainable Development Index (SDI) in Türkiye using annual data covering the period 1990–2022 within an ARDL cointegration framework. The error correction term, ECM(−1), is estimated at −0.760 and is statistically significant at the 1% level, indicating that short-run deviations from equilibrium are corrected within approximately 1.5 years. Short-run results reveal that a 1% increase in trade openness, population, and energy intensity raises the SDI by 0.09%, 5.00%, and 0.27%, respectively, while a 1% increase in economic growth reduces the SDI by 0.52%, all significant at the 1% level. Long-run estimates show that a 1% increase in population raises the SDI by approximately 2.79%, whereas a 1% increase in economic growth reduces it by 0.73%, both significant at the 1% level. Energy intensity exerts a limited negative effect of −0.31% on the SDI in the long run, significant at the 10% level, while the coefficient of trade openness (0.038) is statistically insignificant over the long run. The Toda-Yamamoto causality test identifies unidirectional causality running from population growth to trade openness and from population growth to economic growth. Overall, these findings suggest that population dynamics support sustainable development in Türkiye through human capital channels in both the short and long run; however, the prevailing growth model appears to be at odds with long-run sustainable development objectives.

Özet

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, küresel ekonomi, sosyal dönüşüm ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik açısından kritik bir araştırma alanı olarak son yıllarda giderek daha fazla ilgi görmektedir. Bu çalışmada, 1990–2022 dönemi yıllık verileri kullanılarak Türkiye'de nüfus değişimi, ekonomik büyüme, enerji yoğunluğu ve ticari açıklığın Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Endeksi (SDI) üzerindeki kısa ve uzun dönemli etkileri ARDL eşbütünleşme yöntemiyle incelenmektedir. Hata Düzeltme Modeli katsayısı ECM(−1) = −0.760 olarak tahmin edilmiş ve %1 anlamlılık düzeyinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur; bu sonuç kısa dönemde ortaya çıkan sapmaların yaklaşık 1.5 yıl içinde uzun dönem dengesine döneceğine işaret etmektedir. Kısa dönem bulgularına göre; ticari açıklık, nüfus, enerji yoğunluğu ve ekonomik büyümedeki %1'lik artışlar SDI'yi sırasıyla %0.09, %5.00 ve %0.27 oranında pozitif, %-0.52 oranında ise negatif yönde etkilemektedir. Uzun dönem tahminleri incelendiğinde, nüfus değişimindeki %1'lik artışın SDI'yi %2.79 oranında artırdığı, ekonomik büyümedeki %1'lik artışın ise SDI'yi %0.73 oranında azalttığı görülmektedir; her iki sonuç da %1 anlamlılık düzeyinde istatistiksel açıdan güçlüdür. Enerji yoğunluğu %10 anlamlılık düzeyinde SDI üzerinde %0.31 oranında sınırlı bir negatif etki sergilemekte, ticari açıklık katsayısı ise (0.038) uzun dönemde istatistiksel olarak anlamsız kalmaktadır. Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi, yalnızca nüfus artışından ticari açıklığa ve nüfus artışından ekonomik büyümeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, Türkiye'de nüfus dinamiklerinin beşeri sermaye kanalı aracılığıyla hem kısa hem de uzun dönemde kalkınmayı olumlu desteklediğini; buna karşın mevcut büyüme modelinin uzun vadede sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefleriyle çeliştiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arkan, M. E. (2026). In Turkey Macroeconomic Determinants of Sustainable Development: An ARDL Based Empirical Analysis (1990–2022). Journal of Business and Trade, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58767/joinbat.1944358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Abbas, F., Malik, U. I., & Abdul Rahman, A. (2025). Nexus between institutional quality, economic openness, and environmental quality: New evidence from the MENA region. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00552-4
  2. Abdi, A. H., Siyad, S. A., Sugow, M. O., & Omar, O. M. (2025). Approaches to ecological sustainability in sub- Saharan Africa: Evaluating the role of globalization, renewable energy, economic growth, and population density. Research in Globalization, 10, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100273
  3. Adams, S., Adedoyin, F., Olaniran, E., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Energy consumption, economic policy uncertainty and carbon emissions; causality evidence from resource rich economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 179- 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.012
  4. Ali, S., Gill, A. R., & Ali, M. (2025). Transformative routes to sustainable development: The nexus between fiscal decentralization and sustainable environment in developing countries. The Journal of Environment & Development, 34(2), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965241295757
  5. Amjad, M. A., Rani, T., & Wang, F. (2025). Nonlinear effects of energy shortages on sustainable development and economic growth: Evidence from South Asian countries. Sustainable Development, 33(5), 6885-6900. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3492
  6. Anwar, A., Barut, A., Pala, F., Kilinc-Ata, N., Kaya, E., & Lien, D. T. Q. (2024). A different look at the environmental Kuznets curve from the perspective of environmental deterioration and economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from fragile countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(34), 46235- 46254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28761-w
  7. Badur, M. M., Yılmaz, E., & Sensoy, F. (2024). Do corruption and inequality shape sustainable development? Evidence from the post-soviet countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 51(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-01-2023-0065
  8. Bakhsh, S., Alam, M. S., & Zhang, W. (2024). Green finance and sustainable development goals: İs there a role for geopolitical uncertainty? Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(4), 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644- 024-09719-5
  9. Beyaz, C. (2024). Yüzüncü yılında Türkiye demografisi. Humaıntas-Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(Spec. Iss.), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1386262
  10. Bloom, D. E., & Freeman, R. B. (1988). Economic development and the timing and components of population growth. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(88)90035-X
  11. Cengiz, Ç., & Kutlu, E. (2021). The budget of the European Unıon and green energy: Perceptions, actions, and challenges. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 14(1), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.950563
  12. Cheung, Y. W., & Lai, K. S. (1997). Bandwidth selection, prewhitening, and the power of the Phillips-Perron test. Econometric Theory, 13(5), 679-691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600006137
  13. Chudy-Laskowska, K., & Pisula, T. (2022). An analysis of the use of energy from conventional fossil fuels and green renewable energy in the context of the European Union’s planned energy transformation. Energies, 15(19), 7369. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197369
  14. Dai, J., Hiung, E. Y. T., Destek, M. A., & Ahmed, Z. (2024). Green policymaking in top emitters: assessing the consequences of external conflicts, trade globalization, and mineral resources on sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 31(6), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2024.2319136
  15. Degirmenci, T., & Ünsal, Y. (2026). Achieving sustainable development through the green budget in the European Union: The role of renewable energy, energy productivity, and environmental policy. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70624
  16. Degirmenci, T., Aydin, M., Bozatli, O., & Ahmed, Z. (2025). Consolidating sustainable development in OECD countries: The role of green energy transition, green innovation, environmental policy stringency, and human capital. Sustainable Development, 33, 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70034
  17. Destek, M. A., Sohag, K., Aydın, S., & Destek, G. (2023). Foreign direct investment, stock market capitalization, and sustainable development: Relative impacts of domestic and foreign capital. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 28903-28915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24066-6
  18. Diler, H. G. (2018). Türkiye ekonomisinin makroekonomik değişkenleri üzerine yapısal kırılmalı ve mevsimsel birim kök analizi. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri, 4(7), 106-120.
  19. Djellouli, N., Abdelli, L., Elheddad, M., Ahmed, R., & Mahmood, H. (2022). The effects of non-renewable energy, renewable energy, economic growth, and foreign direct investment on the sustainability of African countries. Renewable Energy, 183, 676-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.066
  20. Doru, Ö. & Düşünceli, F. (2021). Türkiye’de ticari dışa açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisi: ARDL sınır testi ve nedensellik analizi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12 (23), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2021.003
  21. Ecer, K., Güner, O., & Çetin, M. (2021). Avrupa yeşil mutabakatı ve Türkiye ekonomisinin uyum politikaları. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 125-144. https://izlik.org/JA36HS33ET
  22. Ehigiamusoe, K. U., Lean, H. H., Dogan, E., Binsaeed, R. H., & Ramakrishnan, S. (2024). Impact of climate change on economic growth in developing countries: Unravelling the moderating role of globalization. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-024-00427-y
  23. Erdoğan, B., & Koç, S. (2026). Economic growth or environmental sustainability: Can we have both?: An application in G7 countries (1974-2023). Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3), 1302- 1320. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1673854
  24. Eroğlu Sevinç, D., & Akıncı, M. (2025). Does economic growth ımpact environmental degradation? Evidence from OECD countries using the panel dynamic threshold model. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 11(1), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1648845
  25. Fertő, I., & Harangozó, G. (2025). Trade-offs and synergies when balancing economic growth and globalization for sustainable development goals achievement. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 8634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 025-93360-3
  26. Gani, W. (2023). Exploring the nexus between competition and the sustainable development goals in OECD countries. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3721-3733. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2622
  27. Gerlich, M., Milojevic, M., & Tsvetkova, L. (2025). Economic prosperity and the ımplementation of sustainable development models among SMEs in European countries: Correlational analysis and ıncentive system. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 8499-8510. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70135
  28. Hatipler, M. (2012). Türkiye-AB gümrük birliği antlaşması ve antlaşmanın Türkiye ekonomisine etkileri. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 14-32. https://izlik.org/JA65FP54CF
  29. Headey, D. D., & Hodge, A. (2009). The effect of population growth on economic growth: A meta‐regression analysis of the macroeconomic literature. Population and Development Review, 35(2), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00274.x
  30. Hickel, J. (2020). The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 167, 106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011
  31. Hunjra, A. I., Bouri, E., Azam, M., Azam, R. I., & Dai, J. (2024). Economic growth and environmental sustainability in developing economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102341
  32. Islam, H., Ajala, Z., Rana, M., & Boujelbene, Y. (2026). Exploring the interactions between environmental taxation, energy poverty, and urbanization in achieving SDGs in developing countries. GeoJournal, 91(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-026-11576-w
  33. İnançlı, S., & Arkan, M. E. (2025). Türk devletleri teşkilatı’na üye ülkelerde doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlar ile tüketimin ekolojik ayak izinin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkileri. Econder Uluslararası Akademik Dergi, 9(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.35342/econder.1609959
  34. Kara, S., Oğurlu, Y., Hossain, M. E., Alnour, M., Rej, S., & Sirag, A. (2025). The spatial spillover effects of public sector transparency on advancing Africa's sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70589
  35. Kaya, F. (2017). Coğrafi potansiyelleri temelinde Türkiye jeopolitiği ve dünya siyasetindeki yeri. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 1-14. https://izlik.org/JA77LZ27EL
  36. Konat, G., & Fendoğlu, E. (2021). BRICS-T ülkelerinin nüfus artış hızı ile kalkınma ilişkisi: yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme analizi. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 1(51), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.976501
  37. Kong, L., Sofuoğlu, E., Ishola, B. D., Abbas, S., Guo, Q., & Khudoykulov, K. (2024). Sustainable development through structural transformation: a pathway to economic, social, and environmental progress. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09583-3
  38. Kruse-Andersen, P. K. (2023). Directed technical change, environmental sustainability, and population growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 122, 102885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102885
  39. Lin, B., & Raza, M. Y. (2020). Analysis of energy security indicators and CO2 emissions. A case from a developing economy. Energy, 200, 117575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117575
  40. Liobikienė, G., & Dagiliūtė, R. (2021). Do positive aspects of renewable energy contribute to the willingness to pay more for green energy?. Energy, 231, 120817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120817
  41. Lu, M., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Mineral resource extraction and environmental sustainability for green recovery. Resources Policy, 90, 104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104616
  42. Meng, C., Du, X., Zhu, M., Ren, Y., & Fang, K. (2023). The static and dynamic carbon emission efficiency of transport industry in China. Energy, 274, 127297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127297
  43. Mohammed, A. L., Yakubu, I. N., & Bunyaminu, A. (2025). The ınterplay between financial ınclusion and the sustainable development goals ındex in ASEAN-5 countries. In strategic approaches to banking business and sustainable development goals (pp. 129-138). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 031-80744-2_8
  44. Mukiyen Avcı, G. (2025). Çevresel bozulmayı ne belirler? Seçilmiş ülkeler için iktisadi büyüme, dış ticaret, kentleşme ve yenilenebilir enerjinin malzeme ayak izi üzerindeki etkileri. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 21(1), 343-366. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1580181
  45. Narayan, P. K. & Narayan, S. (2005). Estimating ıncome and price elasticities of ımports for Fiji in a cointegration framework. Economic Modelling, 22(3), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2004.06.004
  46. Özcan, B., & Arı, A. (2013). Para talebinin belirleyenleri ve istikrarı üzerine bir uygulama: Türkiye örneği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 20(2), 105-120. https://izlik.org/JA49GL34SR
  47. Park, J. Y. (1992). Canonical cointegrating regressions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 119- 143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951679
  48. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  49. Phillips, P. C., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. The review of economic studies, 57(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
  50. Rasoulinezhad, E., & Mostaghimi, N. (2024). How can financial development affect sustainable economic development? Evidence from Asian countries with different income levels. Iranian Economic Review, 28(1), 31- 48. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2024.334304.1007325
  51. Sayehmırı, A., Nekgoftar, L., Askarı, H., & Shayan, A. (2021). A metaanalysis of population growth ımpact on economic growth. Social Welfare Quarterly, Vol 20, No 79.
  52. Shaker, R. R., & Mackay, B. R. (2021). Hidden patterns of sustainable development in Asia with underlying global change correlations. Ecological Indicators, 131, 108227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108227
  53. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 783-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763
  54. Sun, Y., Zhou, L., Wang, D., Jin, K., Wu, Q., & Wu, R. (2024). How economic policy uncertainty affects common prosperity in China? The mediating role of green finance and the moderating role of low-carbon technology. Finance Research Letters, 67, 105701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105701
  55. Uysal, D., & Yılmaz, K. (2015). Enerji ithalatı ve cari açık ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.22254
  56. Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024). Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03520-5
  57. Wang, Q., Wang, L., & Li, R. (2024). Trade openness helps move towards carbon neutrality-insight from 114 countries. Sustainable Development, 32(1),1081-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2720
  58. Wang, S., & Tian, G. (2025). The impact of extended energy balances on environmental policy stringency in climate modeling: Role of energy intensity in sustainable development. Energy, 320, 135208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135208
  59. Wen, Y., & Zhang, S. (2024). Assessing the impact of resource efficiency on sustainable development: Policies to cope with resource scarcity in Chinese provinces. Resources Policy, 90, 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104754
  60. Xue, C., Shahbaz, M., Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., & Sinha, A. (2022). Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: What is the role of economic policy uncertainty? Renewable Energy, 184, 899- 907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.006
  61. Yang, X., Li, N., Mu, H., Pang, J., Zhao, H., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Study on the long-term impact of economic globalization and population aging on CO2 emissions in OECD countries. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 147625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147625
  62. Zheng, T., Chai, Z., Zuo, P., & Wang, X. (2024). The effect of multilateral economic cooperation on sustainable natural resource development. Sustainability, 16(17), 7267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177267