SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Esenyurt Üniversitesi İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF STRATEGIC AGILITY

LOJİSTİK PERFORMANS VE SOĞURMA KAPASİTESİ: STRATEJİJ ÇEVİKLİĞİN ARACI ROLÜ

Aybike Esra Şahin(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1829-648X
Gökçen Öztürk(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3294-3922
Zahide Yeşim Dikici(KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5422-3854
Pages
51–69
Publication Date
2023-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, strategic agility can shape the relationship between absorptive capacity and logistics performance by strengthening organizations' ability to adapt to external changes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aims to analyze the mediating effect of strategic agility on the relationship between absorptive capacity and logistics performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings show that strategic agility has a partial mediating effect on logistics performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, strategic agility can shape the relationship between absorptive capacity and logistics performance by strengthening organizations' ability to adapt to external changes.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stratejik Çeviklik · Lojistik Performans · Absorbe Kapasitesi

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the mediating effect of strategic agility on the relationship between absorptive capacity and logistics performance. In the research model, a connection was established between the variables and the impact on the logistics industry was tried to be revealed through a quantitative study. In the study; Survey method is used as a quantitative research method. For this purpose, the data obtained by applying a survey to the managers working in logistics companies registered to the chamber of commerce operating in the Marmara region of Turkey was analyzed using the SPSS program. The findings show that strategic agility has a partial mediating effect on logistics performance. These results highlight the importance of organizations in today's increasingly complex and dynamic business world to gain competitive advantage not only from a static perspective, but also through the ability to react quickly and demonstrate flexibility. In this context, strategic agility can shape the relationship between absorptive capacity and logistics performance by strengthening organizations' ability to adapt to external changes.

Özet

Bu araştırma, soğurma kapasitesi ile lojistik performans arasındaki ilişkide stratejik çevikliğin aracılık etkisini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma modelinde değişkenler arasında bağlantı kurularak lojistik sektörü üzerindeki etkisi nicel bir çalışma ile ortaya çıkarılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada; Nicel araştırma yöntemi olarak anket yöntemi kullanılmaktadır. Bu amaçla örneklem Türkiye Marmara bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren ticaret odasına kayıtlı lojistik firmalarında çalışan yöneticilere anket uygulanarak elde edilen veriler SPSS programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, stratejik çevikliğin lojistik performansı üzerinde kısmi aracılık etkisine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, günümüzün giderek daha karmaşık ve dinamik hale gelen iş dünyasında, kuruluşların yalnızca statik bir bakış açısıyla değil, aynı zamanda hızlı tepki verme ve esneklik gösterme becerisiyle de rekabet avantajı kazanmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu bağlamda stratejik çeviklik, kuruluşların dış değişimlere uyum sağlama yeteneğini güçlendirerek absorbe kapasitesi ile lojistik performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi şekillendirebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, A. E., Öztürk, G., Dikici, Z. Y. (2023). LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF STRATEGIC AGILITY. İstanbul Esenyurt Üniversitesi İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.61349/iesbad.1403203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Afonso, Ashrafi A., Ravasan, Z. A., Trkman, P., Afshari, S. (2019). The role of business analytics capabilities in bolstering firms’ agility and performance, International Journal of Information Management, 47, 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.005.
  2. Abareshi, A., Molla, A. (2013), Greening logistics and its impact on environmental performance: an absorptive capacity perspective, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 16:3, 209-226, DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2013.812193.
  3. Amin, H. & Shahwan, T. (2020). Logistics management requirements and logistics performance efficiency: the role of logistics management practices - evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 35. 1. 10.1504/IJLSM.2020.103859.
  4. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (24. bs). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802748.
  6. Brueller, N. N., Carmeli, A., & Drori, I. (2014). How Do Different Types of Mergers and Acquisitions Facilitate Strategic Agility? CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 56(3), 39-57.
  7. Camisón, C. and Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement, Journal of Business Research, 63, 7, 707-715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.022.
  8. Cao, Q., & Dowlatshahi, S. (2005). The impact of alignment between virtual enterprise and information technology on business performance in an agile manufacturing environment. Journal of Operations Management, 531-550.
  9. Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Soto-Acosta, P., & Wensley, A. (2016). Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1544-1549.
  10. Christopher, M. (2000). The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 1, 37-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00110-8.
  11. Clauss, T. & Abebe, M. & Tangpong, C. & Hock-Döpgen, M. (2019). Strategic Agility, Business Model Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. PP. 1-18. 10.1109/TEM.2019.2910381.
  12. Cohen, Wesley & Levinthal, Daniel. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35. 128-152. 10.2307/2393553.
  13. Çelebi, Dilay. (2019). The role of logistics performance in promoting trade. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 21. 10.1057/s41278-017-0094-4.
  14. Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding Strategic Agility A Leadership Agenda for Accelerating Business Model Renewal. Long Range Planning, 43, 370-382.
  15. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. (2018). Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
  16. Dyer, L., & Shafer, R. (1998). From human resource strategy to organizational effectiveness: Lessons from research on organizational agility.
  17. Ekici, Ş. Ö., Kabak, Ö., & Ülengin, F. (2019). Improving logistics performance by reforming the pillars of Global Competitiveness Index. Transport Policy, 81, 197-207.
  18. Felipe, C. M., Roldán, J. L., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2017). Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility. Sustainability, 9(12), 2354.
  19. Fernhaber, Stephanie & Patel, Pankaj. (2012). How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal. 33. 10.1002/smj.1994.
  20. Fugate, B., & Mentzer, J. (2010). Logistics Performance: Efficiency, Effectiveness, And Differentiation. Journal of Business Logistics, 43-62.
  21. Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Holcomb, M., & Bozkurt, S. (2019). Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management.30. 467-487. 10.1108/IJLM-10-2017-0259.
  22. Gonzalez-Campo & Ayala (2014), Influencia de la capacidad de absorción sobre la innovación: un análisis empírico en las mipymes colombianas, Estudios Gerenciales, issue, number 11989, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000129:011989.
  23. Haider, S. A., & Kayani, U. (2021). The impact of customer knowledge management capability on project performance-mediating role of strategic agility. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 298-312.
  24. Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31, 675-686.
  25. Hock, M., Clauss, T., & Schulz, E. (2016). The impact of organizational culture on a firm’s capability to innovate the business model.R&D Management, 46-3, 433-450.
  26. Jackson, M., & Johansson, C. (2003). An agility analysis from a production system perspective. Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 14. 482-488. 10.1108/09576060310491342.
  27. Jacobs, M., Droge, C., Vickery, S., & Calantone, R. (2011). Product and process modularity's effects on manufacturing agility and firm growth performance. ournal of product innovation management, 28(1), 123-137.
  28. Kale, E., Aknar, A., & Başar, Ö. (2019). Absorptive capacity and firm performance: The mediating role of strategic agility. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 276-283.
  29. Khan, S. H., Yasir, M., & Majid, A. (2020). Strategic renewal of SMEs:the impact of social capital,strategic agility and absorptive capacity. Management Decision.
  30. Kohtamäki, M., Heimonen, J., Sjödin, D., & Heikkilä, V. (2020). Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory. Journal of Business Research, 12-25.
  31. Lee, Eon-Seong & Song, Dong-Wook. (2018). Knowledge management in freight forwarding as a logistics intermediator: model and effectiveness. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 16. 1-9. 10.1080/14778238.2018.1475848.
  32. Lee, O., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398-417.
  33. Lin, C.-T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P.-Y. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of production economics, 100(2), 285-299.
  34. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility, Decision Support Systems, 54, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016.
  35. Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS quarterly, 931-954.
  36. M.A., A., Asikhia, O., & Makinde, G. (2019). Strategic Agility and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Organisational Culture. Business Management Dynamics, 9(3), 01-12.
  37. Mentzer, J. T., Min, S. and Michelle Bobbitt, L. (2004). Toward a unified theory of logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(8), 606-627.
  38. Mohamad, M.F. & Udin, Zulkifli & Sharif, Kamal Imran. (2018). Inventory, warehousing and transportation management impacts towards logistics performance in supply chain management. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 7. 296-299.
  39. Moura, Dulcineia & Silva, Maria & Duarte, Filipe & Carvalho, João & Kahilana, Orlando. (2018). Absorptive capacity and cooperation evidence in innovation from public policies for innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science. 11. 10.1108/IJIS-05-2017-0051.
  40. Nallusamy, S. (2021), Performance Measurement on Inventory Management and Logistics Through Various Forecasting Techniques [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 17(2): 216-228.
  41. Ngai, E. W., Chau, D., & Chan, T. (2011). Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3), 232-249.
  42. Nurjaman, R., Rahayu, A., Wibowo, L., & Widjajani. (2021). The role of strategic agility towards the firm performance of logistics service providers in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 11, 965–974.
  43. Omoush, M. M. (2020). Investigation the Relationship Between Supply Chain Management Activities and Operational Performance: Testing the Mediating Role of Strategic Agility A Practical Study on the Pharmaceutical Companies. International Business Research, 13(2), 74-89.
  44. Rezaei, J., Roekel, W. S. V, Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method, Transport Policy, 68, 158-169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.007.
  45. Routroy, S., Potdar, P., & Shankar, A. (2015). Measurement of manufacturing agility: a case study. Measuring Business Excellence. 19. 1-22. 10.1108/MBE-06-2014-0018.
  46. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly, 237-263.
  47. Shams, R., Vrontis, D., Belyaeva, Z., Ferraris, A., & Czinkota, M. (2021). Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals. ournal of International Management, 27(1), 100737.
  48. Skyrius, R., & Valentukevičė, J. (2020). Business Intelligence Agility, Informing Agility and Organizational Agility: Research Agenda. Informacijos mokslai, 90, 8-25.
  49. Suradi, Mahrinasari, M., & Hasnawati, S. (2020). The Mediating Effect of Strategic Agility in the Relationship of Supply Chain Management Activities and Firm Performance of the Textile Industry of Indonesia. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mg, 9(3), 649-656.
  50. Stachowiak, Agnieszka & Adamczak, Michał & Hadas, Lukasz & Domañski, R. & Cyplik, Piotr. (2019). Knowledge Absorption Capacity as a Factor for Increasing Logistics 4.0 Maturity. Applied Sciences. 9. 5365. 10.3390/app9245365.
  51. Tallon, P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS quarterly, 463-486.
  52. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. alifornia management review, 58(4), 13-35.
  53. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443.
  54. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Lim, Ming K & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Wp, Wong. (2019). Improving sustainable supply chain capabilities using social media in a decision-making model. Journal of Cleaner Production. 227. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.202.
  55. Tzokas, Nikolaos & Kim, Young-Ah & Akbar, Hammad & Al-Dajani, Haya. (2015). Absorptive capacity and performance: The role of customer relationship and technological capabilities in high-tech SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management. 47. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.033.
  56. Vecchiato, R. (2015). Creating value through foresight: First mover advantages and strategic agility. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 101, 25-36.
  57. Vickery, S., Droge, C., Setia, P., & Sambarmurthy, V. (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025-7042.
  58. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40792483.
  59. Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic Agility: A State of Art. California Management Review, 56(3), 5-12. Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Social Science Research, 329.
  60. Wilding, R., Wagner, B., Gligor, D., & Holcomb, M. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 438-453.
  61. Yang, S. L., & Li, T. (2002). Agility evaluation of mass customization product manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 129, 640-644.
  62. Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing:: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of production economics, 62(1-2), 33-43.
  63. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351.
  64. Zielske, M. & Held, T. (2021), Application of agile methods in traditional logistics companies and logistics startups: Results from a German Delphi Study, Journal of Systems and Software, 177, 110950, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.110950.
  65. Fugate, B., & Mentzer, J. (2010). Logistics Performance: Efficiency, Effectiveness, And Differentiation. Journal of Business Logistics, 43-62.
  66. Gonzalez-Campo & Ayala (2014), Influencia de la capacidad de absorción sobre la innovación: un análisis empírico en las mipymes colombianas, Estudios Gerenciales, issue, number 11989, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000129:011989.
  67. Vickery, S., Droge, C., Setia, P., & Sambarmurthy, V. (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025-7042.