SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Antropoloji Dergisi / 2025 / Sayı: 5

A Reassessment of the Late Miocene Rhinocerotidae of Anatolia Based on Recent Fossil Evidence

Özge Kahya Parıldar(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0209-6547
Pınar Gözlük Kırmızıoğlu(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0759-3529
Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2026-05-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While most Rhinocerotidae species vanished from Anatolia by the end of the Miocene, certain genera, including Chilotherium, persisted into the mid-Pliocene, indicating possible ecological refugia in the region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reassess the paleobiogeographic distribution and phylogenetic diversity of Rhinocerotidae species from the Late Miocene of Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Utilising data obtained from recent scientific publications and the New and Old World Neogene (NOW) fossil mammal database, the research identifies 105 rhinoceros-bearing fossil localities among 247 Late Miocene sites located across modern-day Anatolia and Thrace.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While most Rhinocerotidae species vanished from Anatolia by the end of the Miocene, certain genera, including Chilotherium, persisted into the mid-Pliocene, indicating possible ecological refugia in the region.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rhinocerotidae · Late Miocene · Anatolia

Abstract

This study aims to reassess the paleobiogeographic distribution and phylogenetic diversity of Rhinocerotidae species from the Late Miocene of Anatolia. Utilising data obtained from recent scientific publications and the New and Old World Neogene (NOW) fossil mammal database, the research identifies 105 rhinoceros-bearing fossil localities among 247 Late Miocene sites located across modern-day Anatolia and Thrace. Fossil evidence from these localities reveals the presence of ten rhinocerotid genera, including Chilotherium, Miodiceros, Acerorhinus, Dihoplus, Aceratherium, Stephanorhinus and Diceros. Based on spatial distribution, the fossil sites are categorised into three main geographic regions: Southern Anatolia, Western Anatolia, and Central Anatolia. Genera such as Chilotherium, Miodiceros, Acerorhinus, and Dihoplus were commonly recorded across all three regions. The findings demonstrate that Rhinocerotidae formed a significant component of Anatolia’s Late Miocene mammalian fauna, showing notable taxonomic diversity during this period. The co-occurrence of rhinoceroses with other taxa adapted to open and woodland habitats—such as hyenas, felids, bovids, hipparionine equids, and proboscideans—suggests that the regional assemblages were strong representatives of the Pikermian chronofauna, which was widespread across Eurasia during the Late Miocene. While most Rhinocerotidae species vanished from Anatolia by the end of the Miocene, certain genera, including Chilotherium, persisted into the mid-Pliocene, indicating possible ecological refugia in the region.

🔖

Cite This Article

Parıldar, Ö. K., Kırmızıoğlu, P. G. (2026). A Reassessment of the Late Miocene Rhinocerotidae of Anatolia Based on Recent Fossil Evidence. İstanbul Antropoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26650/IAR2025-1756988

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Antunes, M.T. & Ginsburg L. (1983). “Les Rhinocérotidés du Miocène de Lisbonne Systématique, Écologie, Paléobiogéographie, Frade Valeur Stratigraphique”. Ciências de Terra (UNL). 7: 17- 98. google scholar
  2. Eisenmann, V. & Guerin, C. (1984). “Morphologie Fonctionnelle Et Environnement Chez Les Perissodactyles”. Geobios Memoire Special. 8: 69-74. google scholar
  3. Eronen, J. T., Ataabadi, M. M., Micheels, A., Karme, A., Bernor, R. L., & Fortelius, M. (2009). Distribution history and climatic controls of the Late Miocene Pikermian chronofauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(29), 11867-11871. google scholar
  4. Fortelius, M., Eronen, J., Jernvall, J., Liu, L., Pushkina, D., Rinne, J., Tesakov, A., Vislobokova, I., Zhang, Z. & Zhou, L. (2002). Fossil Mammals Resolve Regional Patterns of Eurasian Climate Change Over 20 Million Years. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4(7), 1005-1016. google scholar
  5. Fortelius, M., Heissig, K., Saraç, G., Şen, Ş. (2003). “Rhinocerotidae (Perissodactyla)”. In Fortelius, M., Kappelman, J., Şen, Ş., Bernor, RL., (Ed.) Geology and Paleontology of the Miocene Sinap Formation, Turkey. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  6. Giaourtsakis, Ioannis X. (2003). “Late Neogene Rhinocerotidae of Greece: Distribution, Diversity And Stratigraphical Range”. Jelle W.F. Reumer ve Wilma Wessels (ed.). Distribution And Migration Of Tertiary Mammals In Eurasia, A Volume In Honour Of Hans De Bruijn, Deinsea, Rotterdam: Natuurmuseum Rotterdam. 235-253. google scholar
  7. Guérin, C. (1980). “A Propos des Rhinocéros (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) Néogénes E Quaternaires d'Afrique: Essai de Synthése Sure Les Espéces Et Sur Les Gisements”. Proc. 8th Panafr. Cong. Prehist. Quat, Stu. 65-83. google scholar
  8. Hamilton, W. (1973). “North African Lower Miocene Rhinoceroses”. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. 24(6): 351-395. google scholar
  9. Heissig, K. (1972). “Die Obermiozäne Fossil-Lagerstätte Sandelzhausen”. 5. Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia), Systematik und Ökologie.- Mitt. Bayer. Staatssamml. Paläont. Hist. Geol. 12: 57- 81. google scholar
  10. Heissig, K. (1975). “Rhinocerotidae aus dem Jungetertiar Anatolies”. Geologisches Jahrbuch. 15:145- 151. google scholar
  11. Heissig, K. (1999). “Family Rhinocerotidae” In: Rössner, G.E., Heissig, K. (Ed.). The Miocene Land Mammals Of Europe. München (Dr. Friedrich Pfeil), 175-188. google scholar
  12. Hunermann, K. A. (1982). “Rekonstruktion Des Aceratherium (Mammalia, Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotidae) Aus Dem Jungtertiar Vom Howenegg/Hegau (Baden-Wurttemberg, BRD)”. Zeitschrift fuer Geologische Wissenschaften. 107: 929-942. google scholar
  13. Kaya, Tanju (1994). “Ceratotherium neumayri (Rhinocerotidae, Mammalia) in The Upper Miocene of Western Anatolia”. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 3(1): 13-22. google scholar
  14. Kaya F. (2017). Paleobiogeographic and Paleoecologic Development of the Old World Savanna Paleobiome during the Neogene. Phd Dissertation. University of Helsinki Press, Helsinki Finland. google scholar
  15. Kaya, F., Kaymakçi, N., Bibi, F., Eronen, J. T., Pehlevan, C., Erkman, A. C., & Fortelius, M. (2016). “Magnetostratigraphy and paleoecology of the hominid-bearing locality Çorakyerler, Tuglu Formation (Çankiri Basin, Central Anatolia)”. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 36(2), e1071710. google scholar
  16. Kaya, F., Bibi, F., Žliobaitė, I., Eronen, J. T., Hui, T. & Fortelius, M. (2018). The rise and fall of the Old World savannah fauna and the origins of the African savannah biome. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(2), 241-246. google scholar
  17. Li C., Wu W., ve Qiu Z. (1984). “Chinese Neogene: Subdivision And Correlation”. Vert. PalAsiatica. 22(3): 171-178. google scholar
  18. McKenna, M.C. (1975). "Fossil Mammals And Early Eocene North Atlantic Land Continuity". Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62:335-353. google scholar
  19. Mirzaie Ataabadi, M. (2010). The Miocene of Western Asia; Fossil Mammals at the Crossroads of Faunal Provinces and Climate Regimes. PhD Dissertation. Helsinki University Print. Helsinki. google scholar
  20. Nowak, M. R. (1991). Walker’s Mammals of the World Volume II. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. google scholar
  21. Pehlevan, Cesur (2006). Çorakyerler (Çankırı) Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia) Buluntularının Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Basılmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara. google scholar
  22. Prothero, D. R., Manning, E., & Hanson, C. B. (1986). “The Phylogeny Of The Rhinocerotidea (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)”. Zoological Journal Of The Linnean Society. 87: 341-366, 8(1): 16-30. google scholar
  23. Prothero, D. R., Manning, E., ve Guerin, C. (1989). The History of the Rhinocerotidae. The Evolution of Perissodactyls. New York: Oxford Unv. Pres. google scholar
  24. Prothero, D. R. & Schoch, R.M. (1989). “Classification of the Perissodactyla,” In: Prothero, D.R., Schoch, R.M. (ed.): The Evolution of the Perissodactyls. 530-537; New York (Oxford University Press). google scholar
  25. Radinsky, L. B. (1967). “A review of the rhinocerotoid family Hyracodontidae (Perissodactyla)”. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 136(1)-46. google scholar
  26. Radinsky, L.B. (1966). “The Families Of The Rhinocerotoidea (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)”. Journal of Mammalogy. 47(4): 631-639. google scholar
  27. Rögl, F., (1999). “Mediterranean And Paratethys. Facts And Hypotheses Of An Oligocene To Miocene Paleogeography (Short Overwiev)”. Geologica Carpathica. 50(4):339–349. google scholar
  28. Santafé-Llopis, J.V. (1978). Rhinocerotidos fosiles de Espaῆa. Thése Fact. Sci. Géol. Univ. Barcelone. 1-501. google scholar
  29. Sevim Erol, A., Begun, D. R., Yavuz, A., Tarhan, E., Sözer, Ç. S., Mayda, S., Van Den Hoak Ostende, L.W., Martin, R.M.G. & Alçiçek, M. C. (2023). A new ape from Türkiye and the radiation of late Miocene hominines. Communications Biology, 6(1), 842. google scholar
  30. Sevim Erol, A. (2023). Cumhuriyetin 100. yılında insanlık tarihine damgasını vuran Çorakyerler Omurgalı Fosil Kazısı. Anthropology, (46), 67-77. google scholar
  31. Steininger, F. F. (1999). “Chronostratigraphy, Geochronology And Biochronology Of The Miocene “European Land Mammal Mega-Zones” (Elmmz) And The Miocene “Mammal-Zones (Mn- Zones)”. The Miocene land mammals of Europe. 9-24. google scholar
  32. Şen, Ş. (1994). Les gisements de Mammifères du Miocène supérieur de Kemiklitepe, Turquie. Bulletin du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Section C, Sciences de la terre, paléontologie, géologie, minéralogie. 16(1). google scholar
  33. The NOW Community, (2025). New and Old Worlds Database of Fossil Mammals (NOW). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Retrieved [10.08.2024] from https://nowdatabase.org/now/database/.DOI doi:10.5281/zenodo.4268068. google scholar
  34. Wagner, J. A. (1848). “Urweltliche Säugethiere-Überreste aus Griechenland”. Abh. k. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 11 Cl. 5(2): 335-378. google scholar
  35. West, R.M., M.R. Dawson & J.H. Hutchison. (1977). “Fossils from the Paleogene Eureka Sound Formation, N.W.T., Canada. Occurrence, Climatic And Paleogeographic Implication”. In:West, R.M. (ed.). Paleontology and plate tectonics. -Milw. Public Mus. Spec. Publ. Biol. Geol., 2: 77- 93 google scholar