Journals / International Journal of Medical Biochemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of SST and RST tube biochemistry parameter results in emergency laboratory

Pages
62–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This can lead to increased laboratory efficiency and improved patient management in emergency departments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The goal of the hospital emergency laboratory is to provide quick and accurate test results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the permission of emergency department patients who required laboratory test results, blood samples were collected in 2 different types of tubes: the standard serum separator tube (SST) and the rapid serum tube (RST) (SST Advance II and Vacutainer RST; Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and the results were compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This can lead to increased laboratory efficiency and improved patient management in emergency departments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The goal of the hospital emergency laboratory is to provide quick and accurate test results. With the permission of emergency department patients who required laboratory test results, blood samples were collected in 2 different types of tubes: the standard serum separator tube (SST) and the rapid serum tube (RST) (SST Advance II and Vacutainer RST; Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and the results were compared. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 75 adult patients into RST and SST tubes via routine phlebotomy. Both tubes were centrifuged according the instructions for obtaining serum, and then each tube was tested for the level of alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, lipase, total creatinine kinase, creatinine kinase-muscle/brain enzyme, albumin, glucose, calcium, chloride, creatinine, potassium, sodium, total and direct bilirubin, total protein, and urea with an Abbott Architect c16000 (Abbot Diagnostics, Inc., Lake Forest, IL, USA) analyzer and biochemical methods. Statistical calculations were performed with the NCSS 2007 program for Windows (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA). Results: When compared with the SST tube sample results, the RST sample results were clinically equivalent or clinically acceptable. The results were evaluated within a 95% confidence interval. The level of statistical significance was established at p<0.05. Conclusion: RSTs do not require a waiting period for clotting, thereby decreasing the turn-around time by nearly 30 minutes. This can lead to increased laboratory efficiency and improved patient management in emergency departments.

🔖

Cite This Article

NEIJMANN, S. T., KURAL, A., CİRAKLİ, Z. L., GEDİKBAŞI, A., DOĞAN, H. (2018). Comparison of SST and RST tube biochemistry parameter results in emergency laboratory. International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 62–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/161629

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kocijancic M, Cargonja J, Delic-Knezevic A. Evaluation of the BD Vacutainer(®) RST blood collection tube for routine chemistry analytes: clinical significance of differences and stability study. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:368–75
  2. Guder WG. History of the preanalytical phase: a personal view. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:25–30
  3. Narayanan S. The preanalytic phase. An important component of laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;113:429–52
  4. Huyghe T, Buntinx F, Bruyninckx R, Besard V, Vunckx J, Church S, et al. Studies on the use of BD Vacutainer® SST II™ and RST™ in general practice: investigation of artefactual hyperkalaemia. Ann Clin Biochem 2014;51:30–7
  5. Yan R, Lou A, Watts G, Tarr H, Smith H, Kinney L, et al. Comparison of Becton Dickinson Vacutainer rapid serum tube with the serum separator tube for routine chemistry and immunoassay tests. J Clin Pathol 2014;67:599–604
  6. Ng WY, Yeo CP. Thrombin-accelerated quick clotting serum tubes: an evaluation with 22 common biochemical analytes. Adv Hematol 2013;2013:769479
  7. Dominici R, Infusino I, Valente C, Moraschinelli I, Franzini C. Plasma or serum samples: measurements of cardiac troponin T and of other analytes compared. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:945–51
  8. Stiegler H, Fischer Y, Vazquez-Jimenez JF, Graf J, Filzmaier K, Fausten B, et al. Lower cardiac troponin T and I results in heparin- plasma than in serum. Clin Chem 2000;46:1338–44
  9. Bowen RA, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:31–44
  10. Dimeski G, Masci PP, Trabi M, Lavin MF, de Jersey J. Evaluation of the Becton-Dickinson rapid serum tube: does it provide a suitable alternative to lithium heparin plasma tubes? Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:651–7
  11. Prusa R, Doupovcova J, Warunek D, Stankovic AK. Improving laboratory efficiencies through significant time reduction in the preanalytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:293–6
  12. Simundic AM, Topic E, Nikolac N, Lippi G. Hemolysis detection and management of hemolyzed specimens. Biochem Med 2010;20:154–9
  13. Koseoglu M, Hur A, Atay A, Cuhadar S. Effects of hemolysis interferences on routine biochemistry parameters. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011;21:79–85
  14. Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2011;48:143–53.