SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Disiplinler Arası Dil Araştırmaları / 2020 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

THE GAP IN THE TYPOLOGY OF ELECTRONIC DICTIONARY AND ‘KAMUSI GOLD’ MODEL

ELEKTRONİK SÖZLÜK TİPOLOJİSİNDE BOŞLUK VE ‘KAMUSİ GOLD’ ÖRNEĞİ

Nazmi Alan(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7314-9269
Pages
23–32
Publication Date
2020-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We are going to inform you about the electronic dictionary “Kamusi” (The Global Online Living Dictionary) and determine where this dictionary locates in the typology of dictionary which was studied before

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Habits change with the needs in line with the development of technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 1980s electronic dictionaries entered our life with computer’s becoming widespread.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We are going to inform you about the electronic dictionary “Kamusi” (The Global Online Living Dictionary) and determine where this dictionary locates in the typology of dictionary which was studied before
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sözlükbilimi · elektronik sözlük · tipoloji

Abstract

Habits change with the needs in line with the development of technology. Lexicography is affected by this. In ancient times volume type of dictionaries which last almost as much as a human life span replace with the electronic dictionaries which are renewed and developed by a teamwork. In 1980s electronic dictionaries entered our life with computer’s becoming widespread. The process which was started before with the offline dictionaries (electronic pocket dictionaries, CD-roms, portable disks etc.) is becoming popular with the online dictionaries today. We are going to inform you about the electronic dictionary “Kamusi” (The Global Online Living Dictionary) and determine where this dictionary locates in the typology of dictionary which was studied before

Özet

Teknolojinin gelişmesiyle ihtiyaçlarla birlikte alışkanlıklar da değişmektedir. Sözlükçülük de bundan nasibini almıştır. Eski dönemlerde neredeyse bir insan ömrünün eseri olan cilt cilt sözlükler yerini, şimdilerde bir ekip çalışmasının sürekli yenilenen ve geliştirilen elektronik sözlüklerine bırakmaya başlamıştır. 1980’li yıllarda bilgisayarın yaygınlaşmasıyla elektronik sözlükler hayatımıza girmeye başlamıştır. Önceleri çevrim dışı (offline) elektronik sözlüklerle (elektronik cep sözlükleri, CD-romlar, taşınabilir diskler ve diğerleri) başlayan süreç günümüzde çevrim içi (online) elektronik sözlüklerle giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, yenilikçi elektronik sözlüklerden biri olan “Kamusi GOLD” (küresel çevrim içi güncel sözlük) adlı çevrim içi sözlüğü ele alacağız. Sözlük hakkında bilgi verip bu sözlüğün daha önce yapılan elektronik sözlük tipolojilerinin neresinde yer aldığını ortaya koyacağız

🔖

Cite This Article

Alan, N. (2020). THE GAP IN THE TYPOLOGY OF ELECTRONIC DICTIONARY AND ‘KAMUSI GOLD’ MODEL. Disiplinler Arası Dil Araştırmaları, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 23–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/1612321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Aksan, Doğan (1982) Her Yönüyle Dil (Ana Çizgileriyle Dilbilim), Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.
  2. Atkins, Beryl T. Sue ve Rundell, Michael (2008) The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography, New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Benjamin, Martin (2014) “Collaboration in the Production of a Massively Multilingual Lexicon”, 9th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 26-31 May, 2014.
  4. Bozkurt, Ferdi (2017) Sözlükselleşme: Genel Sözlükler İçin Sözlük Birim Seçimi, İstanbul: Kesit Yayınları.
  5. De Schryver, Gilles-Maurice (2003) “Lexicographer’s Dreams in the Electronic-Dictionary Age”, International Journal of Lexicography, 16(2): 143–199.
  6. Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro Antonio (2010) “Lexicography for the Third Millennium: Free Institutional Internet Terminological Dictionaries for Learners”, Specialised Dictionaries for Learners, Berlin: De Gruyter.
  7. Granger, Sylviane ve Paquot, Magali (2012) (ed.) Electronic Lexicography, Oxford: Oxford Universty Press.
  8. Ide, K. (1993) “A Catalogue of Electronic Dictionaries.” Language 22.5: 42-49.
  9. Kamusi GOLD Project: https://kamusi.org/ (15.09.2020).
  10. Kocaman, Ahmet (1998) Dilbilim, Sözlük, Sözlükçülük, Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6, 11-113. Ankara: Kebikeç Yayınları.
  11. Lehr, Andrea (1996) “Zur neuen Lexicographica-Rubrik, Electronic Dictionaries.” Lexicographica, 12: 310–7. Lew, Robert (2011) “Online dictionaries of English”, In P. A. Fuertes-Olivera ve H. Bergenholtz (eds), e-Lexicography. The Internet, Digital Initiatives and Lexicography, 230-250. London and New York: Continuum.
  12. Nesi, Hilary (2000) “Electronic Dictionaries in Second Language Vocabulary Comprehension and Acquisition: the State of the Art”, Proceedings of EURALEX 2000, Stuttgart.
  13. Nesi, Hilary (2009) “Dictionaries In Electronic Form”, in Cowie, A.P. (Ed.), The Oxford History of English Lexicography, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Ölker, Gökhan (2011) Sözlük Türleri ve Kelime Sıklığı Üzerine, Dil Araştırmaları, 9, 45-60.
  15. Pastor, Verónica ve Alcina, Amparo (2010) “Search Techniques in Electronic Dictionaries: A Classification for Translators”, International Journal of Lexicography, 23(3), 307–354.
  16. Sert, Göksel (2019) “Elektronik Sözlük Tipolojileri ve Lexica Örneği”, Dede Korkut Uluslararası Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8/18, s. 58-70.
  17. Sharpe, Peter (1995) “Electronic Dictionaries with Particular Reference to the Design of an Electronic Bilingual Dictionary for English-Speaking Learners of Japanese”, International Journal of Lexicography, 8(1): 39-54.
  18. Storrer, Angelika (2001) “Digitale Wörterbücher als Hypertexte: Zur Nutzung des Hypertextkonzepts in der Lexikographie”, Chancen und Perspektiven Computergestützter Lexikographie, s. 54- 70, Tübingen: De Gruyter.
  19. Swanepoel, Piet (2003) “Dictionary Typologies: A Pragmatic Approach”, A Practical Guide to Lexicography (ed. Piet van Sterkenburg), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  20. Van Sterkenburg, Piet (Ed.) (2003) A Practical Guide to Lexicography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Zgusta, Ladislav (1971) Manual of Lexicography, The Hague: Mouton.