SavedAdd your journal

Journals / TIDE AcademIA Research / 2025 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

The Impact of the COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework on Credit Risk: Evidence from the Turkish Banking Sector

COSO Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi Çerçevesinin Kredi Riski Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Örneği

Serap Özyiğit(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0006-8852-7879
Ömer Faruk Tan(Marmara Üniversitesi)0000-0002-8875-4696
Pages
123–154
Publication Date
2025-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical findings revealed that the "Information, Communication, and Reporting" and "Performance" components established significant relationships with credit risk, while the effects of "Performance" and "Governance" varied depending on bank structure and implementation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the impact of the COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework on credit risk in the Turkish banking sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The five core components defined in the 2017 update of COSO ERM -“Governance and Culture,” “Strategy and Objective-Setting,” “Performance,” “Review and Revision,” and “Information, Communication, and Reporting”- were analyzed by aligning them with bank-level governance and financial indicators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empirical findings revealed that the "Information, Communication, and Reporting" and "Performance" components established significant relationships with credit risk, while the effects of "Performance" and "Governance" varied depending on bank structure and implementation.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi · COSO Kurumsal Risk Yönetim Modeli · Türkiye

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework on credit risk in the Turkish banking sector. The five core components defined in the 2017 update of COSO ERM -“Governance and Culture,” “Strategy and Objective-Setting,” “Performance,” “Review and Revision,” and “Information, Communication, and Reporting”- were analyzed by aligning them with bank-level governance and financial indicators. Data from nine deposit banks operating on Borsa İstanbul between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed using panel data methods. Empirical findings revealed that the "Information, Communication, and Reporting" and "Performance" components established significant relationships with credit risk, while the effects of "Performance" and "Governance" varied depending on bank structure and implementation. These results indicate that not only the structural presence of COSO, but also its integration and application level, is decisive in risk management. The study’s unique contribution is being among the first in Türkiye to empirically test the relationship between COSO ERM and credit risk using panel data analysis. In this respect, it provides an original contribution to corporate risk management literature by offering evidence-based insights into COSO ERM’s effectiveness.

Özet

Bu çalışma, COSO kurumsal risk yönetimi (ERM) çerçevesinin kredi riski üzerindeki etkisini Türkiye bankacılık sektörü özelinde incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. COSO ERM’nin 2017 güncellemesiyle tanımlanan beş temel bileşen “Yönetişim ve Kültür”, “Strateji ve Hedef Belirleme”, “Performans”, “Gözden Geçirme ve Revizyon” ile “Bilgi, İletişim ve Raporlama” banka düzeyindeki yönetişimsel ve finansal göstergelerle eşleştirilerek analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında, 2017 - 2024 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren dokuz mevduat bankasına ait veriler panel veri analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgular, özellikle “Bilgi, İletişim ve Raporlama” ile “Performans” bileşenlerinin kredi riskiyle anlamlı ilişkiler kurabildiğini ortaya koyarken; “Performans” ve “Yönetişim” bileşenlerinin etkisi ise banka yapısına ve uygulama düzeyine bağlı olarak değişkenlik göstermiştir. COSO’nun sadece yapısal varlığı değil, uygulama ve entegrasyon düzeyi de risk yönetiminde belirleyici olmuştur. Çalışmanın özgün katkısı, Türkiye’de COSO ERM çerçevesi ile kredi riski arasındaki ilişkiyi panel veri yöntemiyle inceleyen ilk akademik çalışmalardan biri olmasıdır. Bu yönüyle çalışma, COSO ERM’nin ampirik olarak test edilmesine olanak sağlayarak, kurumsal risk yönetimi alanına özgün katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özyiğit, S., Tan, Ö. F. (2025). The Impact of the COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework on Credit Risk: Evidence from the Turkish Banking Sector. TIDE AcademIA Research, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 123–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/1602009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Abu Hamour, A. M., Massadeh, D. D. M., Bshayreh, M. M. (2021). The Impact of the COSO Control Components on the Financial Performance in the Jordanian Banks and the Moderating Effect of Board Independence. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1886553
  2. Akwaa-Sekyi, E. K., Moreno Gene, J. (2016). Effect of Internal Controls on Credit Risk Among Listed Spanish Banks. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 357–389. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.703
  3. Akwaa-Sekyi, E. K., Moreno Gené, J. (2017). Internal Controls and Credit Risk Relationship Among Banks in Europe. Intangible Capital, 13(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.911
  4. Başar, B. D., Bouteska, A., Büyükoğlu, B., Ekşi, İ. H. (2021). The Effect of Corporate Governance on Bank Performance: Evidence from Turkish and Some MENA Countries’ Banks. Journal of Asset Management, 22(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00223-3
  5. Bouteska, A., Büyükoğlu, B., Ekşi, İ. H. (2023). How Effective Are Banking Regulations on Banking Performance and Risk? Evidence from Selected European Countries. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103604
  6. Chen, H., Dong, W., Han, H., Zhou, N. (2017). A Comprehensive and Quantitative Internal Control Index: Construction, Validation, and Impact. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 337–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-016-0593-x
  7. Chen, H., Yang, D., Zhang, J. H., Zhou, H. (2020). Internal Controls, Risk Management and Cash Holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101695
  8. COSO (2017). Enterprise Risk Management: Executive Summary.
  9. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Temel Ekonometri (Çev. Ü. Şenesen & G. G. Şenesen), 4. Baskı. Literatür Yayıncılık.
  10. Gyamerah, S. A., Laar, G., Asare, C. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of Internal Control Systems on Corporate Performance of Ghanaian Banks: The Moderating Role of Information Technology. Scientific African. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02476
  11. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
  12. Koutoupis, A. G., Malisiovas, T. (2023). The Effects of the Internal Control System on the Risk, Profitability, and Compliance of the U.S. Banking Sector: A Quantitative Approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(2), 1638–1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2498
  13. Leonard, K. K., Naibei, I., Langat, L. (2022). Effect of Internal Control Systems on Financial Performance of Selected Commercial Banks in Selected Counties in Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 12(3), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.12.03.2022.p12322
  14. Metwalli, M. Z. (2025). The Influence of Geopolitical Risk on Cash Holding: Internal Control as a Moderating Variable in Saudi Banks Listed. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(4), 876–899. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i4.7967
  15. Otoo, F. N. K., Kaur, M., Rather, N. A. (2023). Evaluating the Impact of Internal Control Systems on Organizational Effectiveness. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/LBSJMR-11-2022-0078
  16. Pham, H. N. (2021). How Does Internal Control Affect Bank Credit Risk in Vietnam? A Bayesian Analysis. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.873
  17. Trung, N. K. Q. (2021). The Relationship Between Internal Control and Credit Risk: The Case of Commercial Banks in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1908760. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1908760
  18. Wali, S., Masmoudi, S. M. (2020). Internal Control and Real Earnings Management in the French Context. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(2), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2019-0117