Journals / Nubihar Akademi / 2026 / Sayı: 23

Epos and Folk-romance: A Discussion and Evaluation of the Genres of Kurdish Folk Literature

Necat Keskin(MARDİN ARTUKLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0884-1309
Pages
101–122
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, we have listed our proposals for the process of naming and classifying the types of Kurdish folk literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The subject of this article is to evaluate the controversy over the des of “folk-romance” and “epos” in Kurdish folk literature within the context of the debates about genre.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even at the beginning of folklore studies in the 19th century, these issues were discussed in congresses and attempts of classifications were also seen.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, we have listed our proposals for the process of naming and classifying the types of Kurdish folk literature.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Folklore · Genre · Kurdish Folk Literature

Abstract

The subject of this article is to evaluate the controversy over the des of “folk-romance” and “epos” in Kurdish folk literature within the context of the debates about genre. The issue of genres and their naming is an important issue in folklore studies. Even at the beginning of folklore studies in the 19th century, these issues were discussed in congresses and attempts of classifications were also seen. Based on extensive collections from around the world and with new theoretical perspectives, in the 1950s and especially in the 1970s, these discussions expanded, and articles and books were published. These works and views of international folklorists will also be beneficial for Kurdish folklorists. Although the history of Kurdish folklore and folk literature studies reaches back to the beginning of the 20th century and collections have been made during this period, discussions on the subject of genre do not appear much. On the other hand, with the establishment of the Departments of Language and Literature/Kurdish Language and Culture in Turkey, academic works related to Kurdish folklore and folk literature have been also increasing, and in this context, attempts and experiments to name and classify genres are also appearing. In these works, the topic of naming and classifying folk-romances (hikaye) and epos (destan) is particularly dominant. In this work, we first turned to the discussions about the genre in the field of folklore in general. Then, we briefly evaluated the situation of Kurdish folk literature in relation to the subject. The attempts and experiments to name and classify folk-romance and epos in particular have been evaluated in this context. Again, in this context, by benefiting from the works of folklorists from around the world and close-by, we focused on the controversy over the naming of “folk-romance” and “epos”, we evaluated recent works on the subject, and also expressed our own views. Finally, we have listed our proposals for the process of naming and classifying the types of Kurdish folk literature.

Özet

The issue of genres and their naming is an important issue in folklore studies. Even at the beginning of folklore studies in the 19th century, these issues were discussed in congresses, and classification efforts of the genres were seen. Based on extensive collections from around the world and with new theoretical perspectives, in the 1950s and especially in the 1970s, these discussions expanded, and related to the issue articles and books were published. These works and views of international folklorists will also be beneficial for Kurdish folklore studies. Although the history of Kurdish folklore and folk literature studies reaches back to the beginning of the 20th century and collections have been made during this period, discussions on the topic of genres do not appear. In Turkiye, on the other hand, with the establishment of Language and Literature/Kurdish Language and Culture departments, academic works related to Kurdish folklore and folk literature also increased, and in this context, attempts and experiments on naming and classification of genres also appeared. In these works, the issue of naming and classifying folk romances and epic/epos is particularly dominant. In this work, we will first turn to the general discussions about the genre in the field of folklore. Then, the situation of Kurdish folk literature will be briefly evaluated in relation to the topic. The attempts and experiments of naming and classifying folk narratives, and especially folk romance and epic/epos, will be evaluated in this context. Again, in this context, by benefiting from the works of folklorists of the world and neighboring peoples, we will focus on the controversy of naming “epic/epos” and “folk romance”, evaluate the existing works, and also express our views and make our suggestions for the process of naming and classifying the genres of Kurdish folk literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

Keskin, N. (2025). Epos and Folk-romance: A Discussion and Evaluation of the Genres of Kurdish Folk Literature. Nubihar Akademi, Sayı: 23, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.55253/2025.nubihar.1698482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Atlı, H. (2024). Destanên Kurdî ji Alîyê Taybetmendîyên Dirûvî ve. Şarkiyat 16/1, r. 488-501. https://doi.org/10.26791/sarkiat.1437047.
  2. Atlı, H. (2025). Destanên Kurdî Ji Alîyê Tema û Mijarên Xwe ve. International Journal of Kurdish Studies, Volume 11 (1), 399-422, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21600/ijoks.1595895
  3. Aykaç, Y., Güzel, Ş., & Çakar, S. (2019). Bîbliyografyaya Tezên Masterê yên Beşên Ziman û Edebiyata Kurdî û Ziman û Çanda Kurdî (2011-2018). Şarkiyat 11/2 (Ağustos 2019), 1007-1043. https://doi.org/10.26791/sarkiat.581438.
  4. Bascom, W. (1965). The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives. The Journal of American Folklore, Jan. - Mar., 1965, Vol. 78, No. 307 (Jan. - Mar., 1965), pp. 3-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/538099
  5. Ben-Amos, D. (1976a). Introduction. Di nav Folklore Genres (ed. D. Ben-Amos). Austin & London: University of Texas Press, r. ix-xlv.
  6. Ben-Amos, D. (1976b). Analytical Categories and Ethnic Genres. Di nav Folklore Genres (ed. D. Ben-Amos). Austin & London: University of Texas Press, r. 215-242.
  7. Berbir, H. (Brh.) (2013). Destanên Kurdî. Weşanên Şaredariya Kayapınar
  8. Başgöz, İ. (1989). The Structure of Turkish Romances. Di nav Folk Groups and Folklore Genres- A Reader (ed. E. Oring). Logan & Utah: Utah University Press, r. 197-208.
  9. Başgöz, İ. (2012). Türkülü Aşk Hikayeleri Bir Gösterim Olarak. İstanbul: Pan Yayıncılık.
  10. Boratav, P. N. (1946). Doğu Anadolu’da Folklor Derlemeleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 85-95. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dtcfdergisi/issue/66705/1043411
  11. Boybeyi, S. (2008). Prof. Dr. İlhan Başgöz ile Söyleşi- Portre-Söyleşi. Toplum ve Demokrasi, 2 (3), Mayıs-Ağustos, 2008, s. 285–290. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/211025
  12. Boyraz, Ş. (2008). Sözlü Anlatıların Sürekliliği Üzerine Düşünceler. Folklor / Edebiyat, hj: 54, r.105-118.
  13. Boratav, P. N. (2012). Halk Hikayeleri ve Halk Hikayeciliği (Çapa 3yem). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı yayınları
  14. Celîl, C. & Celîl, O. (2013). Zargotina Kurda I-II (çapa 3yem). İstanbul: Aram
  15. Chyet, M. L. (1991). (1991). “And a Thornbush Sprang Up Between Them”: Studies on “Mem û Zîn”, A Kurdish Romance Vol-I-II. Berkeley: University of California (Teza çapnebûyî ya doktorayê).
  16. Eberhard, W. (2002). Güneydoğu Anadolu’dan Aşık Hikayeleri (çev. M. Kocaoğlu Van der Hoeven). Ankara: TDK
  17. Dundes, A. (1980). Text, Texture, Context. Di nav Interpreting Folklore. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. r. 20-32.
  18. El-Shamy, H. (1995). Folk Traditions of the Arab World- A Guide to Motif Classification. (2 cîld). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press
  19. El- Shamy, H. (2018). Folklore of the Arab World. Humanities, 7/3. r. 2-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/h7030067
  20. Ertekin, M. Z., & Güzel, Ş. (2019). Xebatên Kurdolojiyê li Zanîngeha Bîngolê (2014-2018). Mukaddime, 10(1), 161-193. https://doi.org/10.19059/mukaddime.508828
  21. Filiz, M. Ş. (2014). Xebatek Li Ser Destana Derwêşê Evdî. Mêrdîn: Zanîngeha Mardin Artukluyê, Enstîtuya Zimanên Zindî Yên Li Tirkiyeyê (Teza Lîsansa Bilind ya Çapnebûyî).
  22. Filiz, Mehmet Ş. (2021) Destana Dewrêşê Evdî Pênase Dîrok Motîf, Wan: Peywend.
  23. Gentry, K. M. (2006). Kulturkreise. Di nav Encyclopedia of Anthropology (ed. H. James Birx), London & New Delhi: Sage, r. 1387-88.
  24. Hand, Wayland D. (ed.) (1971). American Folk Legend: A Symposium. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  25. Harris, T. (1995). Genre. The Journal of American Folklore. 108/430. r. 509-527. https://www.jstor.org/stable/541658 Hassanpour, A. (1989). Bayt. Encyclopedia Iranica. (Dîtin: 02.05.2022), https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bayt-folk-art
  26. Jansen, W. H. (1961). Turkish Folklore: An Introduction. The Journal of American Folklore, Oct. - Dec., 1961, Vol. 74, No. 294, Folklore Research around the World: A North American Point of View (Oct. - Dec., 1961), pp. 354-361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/538258
  27. Jolles, A. (1965). Einfache Formen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag
  28. Kaplan, Y. (2022). Helsengandinek li ser Cureyên Vegêranê yên di Folklora Kurdî da (Destan, Beyt û Vegêranên Strankî). International Journal of Kurdish Studies, 8/2, r. 273-292.https://doi.org/10.21600/ijoks.1144690
  29. Keskin, N. (2018a). Rewşa Akademiya Kurdî Li Tirkiyeyê û Pirsgirêkên wê-Türkiyede Kürtçe Akdeminin Durumu ve Sorunları. Şarkiyat, 10(1), 471-485.
  30. Keskin, N. (2018b). Roja Nû û Edebiyata Kurdî ya Gelêrî-1. İstanbul: Avesta
  31. Keskin, N. (2019). Folklor û Edebiyata Gelêrî. İstanbul: Avesta
  32. Keskin, N. (2021). Roja Nû û Edebiyata Kurdî ya Gelêrî-2. İstanbul: Avesta
  33. Keskin, N. (2022). Folklora Kurdî di Sedsala 21emîn de: Pirsgirêk û Derfet. Folkilorê Kurdî- Wêje, Ziman, Mêjû, Civak û Kelepor (Berga Dûyê). (ed. H.G Tewfîq; H. O. Ebdulrehman; E. N. Ebdullah; N. E. Hesen). Zakho University.
  34. Mann, O. (1906). Kurdisch-Persiche Forschungen. Berlin
  35. Oring, E. (1989)(ed.). Folk Groups and Folklore Genres- A Reader. Logan & Utah: Utah University Press.
  36. Pertev, R. (2017). Celadet Alî Bedir-Xan: Danerê Termînolojiya (Zaravenasiya) Folklora Kurdî. The Journal of Mesopotamian Studies, C:2/1, Zivistan 2017, r. 17-31. http://jms.artuklu.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/279004
  37. Pertev, R. (2018). Folklor û Nasnameya Kurdî ya Neteweyî (1898-1946). İstanbul: Avesta
  38. Qazî, Q. F. (2009). Sê beytî folklorîk: Mem û Zîn, Xec û Sîyamend, Ehmedî Şeng. Hewlêr: Çapxaney Aras.
  39. Sowayan, S.A. (1992). The Arabian Oral Historical Narrative- An Ethnographic and Linguistic Analysis. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowits
  40. Subaşı, K. (2022a). Weku Sazî û Dezgeh Xebatên Li Ser Folklora Kurdî. Di nav Ekoller ve Kurumlar (ed. M. N. Doru & K. Gökdağ). Mardin: Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi Yayınları, r. 205-232.
  41. Subaşı, K. (2022b). Pirnaviya Cureyên Vegêrana Gelêrî û Nestandartbûna Wan di Kurdî de. Folkilorê Kurdî- Wêje, Ziman, Mêjû, Civak û Kelepor (Berga Dûyê). (ed. H.G Tewfîq; H. O. Ebdulrehman; E. N. Ebdullah; N. E. Hesen). Zakho University.
  42. Subaşı, K. (2024a). Ji Mîtolojîyê Ber Bi Tarîxê û Ji Lehengîyê Ber Bi Evînê- Destan Weku Çemkeke Sîwan Di Vegêrana Gelî Da. Şarkiyat, 16/1, r. 104-116. https://doi.org/10.26791/sarkiat.1425264.
  43. Subaşı, K. (2024b). Zargotina Çiyayê Sîpanê. Destan/Çîrok/Meselok. İstanbul: Nûbihar.
  44. Şaul, M. (2010). İlhan Başgöz’ün Halk Edebiyatı Araştırmalarına Katkısı. Milli Folklor, 22/85, r. 19-25.
  45. van den Bergh, G.van B. (2018). Herder and the Idea of a Nation. Human Figurations, 7/1. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0007.103
  46. Yıldırımçakar, Z., Güzel, Ş., & Çakar, S. (2021). Bîbliyografyaya Tezên Master û Doktorayê yên Beşên Ziman û Edebiyata Kurdî û Ziman û Çanda Kurdî (2011-2020). Kurdiyat(3), 67-99. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kurdiyat/issue/62774/910283
  47. Zengin, E. (2020). Herder’in Folklor Tanımlamalarında Halk Kavramının Doğası. Millî Folklor 126, r. 18-26. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1188006
  48. Jansen, W. H. (1961). Turkish Folklore: An Introduction. The Journal of American Folklore, Oct. - Dec., 1961, Vol. 74, No. 294, Folklore Research around the World: A North American Point of View (Oct. - Dec., 1961), pp. 354-361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/538258