SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mesleki Bilimler Dergisi (MBD) / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

THE EVALUATION OF DISTANCE MEASURING BY ANALITIC HIERARCHY PROCES METHOD

MESAFE ÖLÇME YÖNTEMLERİNİN ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSES YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Metin Ersoy(Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi)
Mustafa Yavuz Çelik
Liyaddin Yeşilkaya
Pages
59–79
Publication Date
2017-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was seen that the laser meter method is the best method and it will be more popular.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the dimension of a marble plants products were measured by laser meter, steel meter and from images then the results were compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Steel meter was used for manual measure method, Leica Disto S910 was used for laser meter method and On 3D Measure software was used for image method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was seen that the laser meter method is the best method and it will be more popular.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ölçme yöntemleri · Lazermetre · On 3D Measure

Abstract

In this study, the dimension of a marble plants products were measured by laser meter, steel meter and from images then the results were compared. At the evaluation stage, Analytic Hierarchy Method a kind of multi criteria decision making method was used. Steel meter was used for manual measure method, Leica Disto S910 was used for laser meter method and On 3D Measure software was used for image method. As a result, it was seen that the laser meter method is the best method and it will be more popular.

Özet

Bu çalışmada mermer işleme tesisindeki ürünlerin (blok, plaka, levha, fayans, vb.) boyutlarının ölçülendirilmesi, lazer metre, şerit metre ve görüntü üzerinden ölçme yöntemleriyle yapılmış, sonuçlar birbirleriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Değerlendirme aşamasında çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Manuel ölçme yönteminde şerit metre, lazer metre yönteminde Leica Disto S910 ve görüntü üzerinden ölçme yönteminde de On 3D Measure programı kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak en iyi yöntemin lazermetre ile ölçüme yöntemi olduğu ve ileride daha yaygın kullanılacağı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ersoy, M., Çelik, M. Y., Yeşilkaya, L. (2017). THE EVALUATION OF DISTANCE MEASURING BY ANALITIC HIERARCHY PROCES METHOD. Mesleki Bilimler Dergisi (MBD), Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 59–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/1596505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Akkoyun, Ö., 2010, Görüntü İşleme Yöntemlerinin Mermer Kalite Seçiminde Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Mersem 7, 1-2.
  2. Alkibay S., Ekmekci A. D., 2010, “AHP method using on sports marketing on the internet: Turkey football super league teams”, Journal of Internet Applications and Management (IUYD’2010) (Tr), 1(2), 41-59
  3. Anon a, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses”, www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/k.yaralioglu/, Connection: June 2012
  4. Anon b, http://cdtgr.com/viewproduct.php, Connection: June 2012
  5. Anon b, Soft, P.,, ON 3D CameraMeasure, https://play.google.com/store/apps, Connection: 2015
  6. Anon c, http://www.sibbons.co.uk/product, Connection: 2015
  7. Anon d, http://e-makina.tr.gg/Kumpas.htm, Connection: 2015
  8. Arıkanoğlu, A., 2013, Eklem ve Kıkırdaktaki Baskı Etkisinin Lazer Taramalı Konfokal Mikroskop İle İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Burdur, 11-12.
  9. Arslan, H., Ders Notları, Ölçme ve Kontrol, Kumpaslar, 2011, http://www.hamitarslan.com/metrik-kumpaslar.html
  10. Bailey, M., Gomez, C.O ve Finch, J.A., 2005. Development and application of an image analysis method for wide bubble size distributions, Minerals Engineering, 18, 1214–1221.
  11. Baltalar H., 2008, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci”, Mobilya Sanayiinde İnnovasyon Uygulamaları II (Tr), Eskişehir, Turkey.
  12. Bayram, Y., 2012, Kireçtaşı ve Mermerlerin Bazı Fiziksel Ve Mekanik Özelliklerinin Dairesel Testereli Kesimde Oluşan Talaş Tane Boyuna Etkisinin İncelenmesi, 8. Ulusal Mermer Ve Doğaltaş Kongresi, Ed: B. Ersoy, A. Sarıışık, E. Özkan, G. Sarıışık, İ.C. Engin ve G.E. Güraksın, Afyon, 358 sf.
  13. Bodin L., Gass S. I., 2003, “On teaching the analytic hierarchy process”, Computers & Operations Research, 30, 1487–1497
  14. Cabello, E., Sanchez, M.A. ve Delgadoz, J., 2002, A New Approach to Identify Big Rocks with Applications to the Mining Industry, Real-Time Imaging 8, 1-9.
  15. Cutaia, L., Massacci, P., ve Roselli, I, 2004, Analysis of Landsat 5 TM Images for Monitoring the State of Restoration of Abandoned Quarries, International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 18(2), 122–134.
  16. Dağdeviren M., Akay D., Kurt M., 2004, “Analytical hierarchy process for job evaluation and application”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ. (Tr), 19(2), 131-138
  17. Demirbaş, F., 2015, Kumpas nedir, nasıl kullanılır, http://www.teknikyaz.com/2015/06/kumpas-nedir_16.html
  18. Demirbaş, F., 2015, Şeritmetre nedir, nasıl kullanılır, http://www.teknikyaz.com/2015/05/olcu-birimine-metre-denir.html
  19. Ekmekçi, Z. ve Şahin, A.N., 2006, Köpük görüntüsü ve flotasyon performansı arasındaki ilişkinin görüntü analiz sistemi ile incelenmesi, Madencilik, Cilt 45, Sayı 2, 27-38.
  20. Ersoy M. ve Yeşilkaya L., 2013. “Choice of marble block cutting machine by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method”, International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 19(1), 67-80.
  21. Ersoy M., Yıldız A. ve Turgut G., 2016. “Luminous transmittance of carbonate based natural stones”, Materials Testing, 58(6), 575-584, doi: 10.3139/120.110894
  22. Gök, İ., Mermer Kesme ve İşleme Makineleri, Yayınlanmamış Ders Notu, Afyonkarahisar, 2000.
  23. Göksu A., Güngör İ., 2008, “Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its application of university preference ranking”, Suleyman Demirel University, The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences (Tr), 13(3), 1-26
  24. Jaehne, B., 1997, Practical Handbook On İmage Processing For Scientific Applications, USA:CRC Press.
  25. Karakuş, D., 2006, Görüntü Analiz Yöntemleri ile Kayaçların Yapısal Özelliklerinin Tanımlanması, Doktora Tezi, DEU Fen B. Ens., İzmir.
  26. Kemeny, J. ve J. Handy., 2004, Improving blast fragmentation prediction with new technologies for rock mass characterization, 30th Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, International Society of Explosive Engineers, New Orleans, LA.
  27. Latham, J.P, Kemeny, J., Maerz, N., Noy, M., Schleifer, J. ve Tose, S., 2003, A Blind Comparison Between Results of Four Image Analysis Systems Using a Photo-Library of Piles of Sieved Fragments, Fragblast, 7(2), 105-132.
  28. Liu, J.J., MacGregor, J.F., Duchesne,C. Ve Bartolacci, G., 2004, Flotation froth monitoring using multiresolutional multivariate image analysis, Minerals Engineering, 18, 65–76.
  29. Maerz, N. H., 1998, Aggregate sizing and shape determination using digital image processing, Center for Aggregates Research (ICAR) Sixth Annual Symposium Proceedings, St. Louis, Missouri, April 19-20, 195-203.
  30. Maerz, N. H., ve Palangio, 2000, Online fragmentation analysis for grinding and crushing control, Control 2000 Symposium, 2000 SME Annual Meeting, March 1, 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, SME, 109-116.
  31. Matthew J. Liberatore M. J., Nydick R. L., 2008, “The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 194–207
  32. Özgür, B., Yandayan T., 2008, Çizgi Skalalı Ölçme Standartları Ve Ölçüm Yöntemleri, 7. Ulusal Ölçümbilim Kongresi, 503 sf. Ramanathan R., 2001, “A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment”, Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 27–35
  33. Saaty T.L., 1990, “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.
  34. Saaty T.L., 1994, “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Interfaces, 24(6), 19-43.
  35. Saaty T.L., 2008, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98
  36. Sağır M., Öztürk Z. K., 2010, “Exam scheduling: Mathematical modeling and parameter estimation with the Analytic Network Process approach", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52, 930-941
  37. Sanchidrián, J.A., Segarra, P. ve López, L.M., 2006, A Practical Procedure for the Measurement of Fragmentation by Blasting by Image Analysis, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 39(4), 359-382.
  38. Triantaphyllou E., Mann S. H., 1995, “Using The Analytic Hıerarchy Process for Decision Making In Engineering Applications: Some Challenges”, Inter’l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44
  39. Turan, B., 2012, Ölçme ders notları, http://web.bilecik.edu.tr/bulent-turan/files/2012/10/olcmekontrol.pdf
  40. Whitaker R., 2007, “Validation examples of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 840–859
  41. Yang J., Shi P., 2002, “Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process in Firm's Overall Performance Evaluation: A Case Study in China”, International Journal Of Business (ISSN:1083-4346), 7(1), 29-46
  42. Yılmaz M., 2007, Kameralı Görsel Boyut Ölçme Otomasyonu, 4. Otomasyon Sempozyumu, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi.
  43. Yılmaz N. G., Göktan R. M., 2008, “Effect of sawing rate on force and energy requirements in the circular sawing of granites”, Journal of Eng&Arch.Fac. Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 21(2), 59-74
  44. Yüksel İ., Akın A., 2006, “Determination strategy in business with analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of Dogus University (Tr), 7(2), 254-268
  45. Anon b, Soft, P.,, ON 3D CameraMeasure, https://play.google.com/store/apps, Connection: 2015
  46. Bayram, Y., 2012, Kireçtaşı ve Mermerlerin Bazı Fiziksel Ve Mekanik Özelliklerinin Dairesel Testereli Kesimde Oluşan Talaş Tane Boyuna Etkisinin İncelenmesi, 8. Ulusal Mermer Ve Doğaltaş Kongresi, Ed: B. Ersoy, A. Sarıışık, E. Özkan, G. Sarıışık, İ.C. Engin ve G.E. Güraksın, Afyon, 358 sf.