Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

Phonatory-Aerodynamic Characteristics of Drama Students

Pages
275–281
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, findings indicated that female drama students used greater percentage of VC while producing syllables [papapapapa].

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Theater actors are considered as elite vocal performers whom quality of voice is of utmost importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 37 vocally healthy participants aged between 21 and 30 years were separated into two groups; the first group included drama students (n=19), and the second group comprised lay talkers (n=18).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, findings indicated that female drama students used greater percentage of VC while producing syllables [papapapapa].
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Theater actors are considered as elite vocal performers whom quality of voice is of utmost importance. It was thought that speech breathing characteristics of theater actors were different compared with those of lay talkers. However, findings on this issue were generally based on studies conducted by the respiratory kinematics and muscular activity via using indirect air volume measures. These measures were by no means related with the respiratory– phonatory interaction. One of the objective methods that is used for evaluating voice quality is the phonatory-aerodynamic characteristics. PhonatoryAerodynamic System (PAS) primarily examines the respiratory–phonatory interaction. The aim of the present study was to search the phonatory-aerodynamic characteristics of drama students. Materials and Methods: A total of 37 vocally healthy participants aged between 21 and 30 years were separated into two groups; the first group included drama students (n=19), and the second group comprised lay talkers (n=18). Phonatoryaerodynamic evaluations were done via PENTAX Medical PAS Model6600. Results: During the phonation of vowel [a], female and male drama students used greater percentage of vital capacity (VC) than public speaker couples. Similarly, findings indicated that female drama students used greater percentage of VC while producing syllables [papapapapa]. As for connected speech, female participants of both groups completed reading in similar durations, but they inspirated faster and they needed lesser number of inspirations. Conclusion: It is concluded that the phonatory-aerodynamic characteristics of theater students are different compared with those of lay talkers predominantly for female participants. The present study’s results may serve clinicians’ basic objective data regarding the speech breathing characteristics of theater actors.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDINLI, F. E., SEZİN, R. K., ÖZCEBE, E., KÖSE, A., GÜNAYDIN, R. Ö. (2019). Phonatory-Aerodynamic Characteristics of Drama Students. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 275–281. https://ajindex.com/articles/159557

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Martin S. Voice care for the professional voice user. Freeman M, Fawcus M, editors. Voice Disorders and Their Management. London and Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers; 2000. p. 283. D’haeseleer E, Meerschman I, Claeys S, Leyns C, Daelman J, Van Lierde K. Vocal Quality in Theater Actors. J Voice 2017; 31(4): 510. e7–510.e14. [CrossRef] Rammage L, Morrison MD, Nichol H, Pullan B, editors. Management of the voice and its disorders. 2nd ed. Vancouver, Canada: Singular; 2001. Hixon TJ. Respiratory Function in Speech and Song. 1th ed. Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins; 1987.
  2. Hixon TJ, Watson PJ, Maher MZ, eds. Respiratory kinematics in classical (Shakespearean) actors. Hixon TJ, editors. Respiratory Function in Speech and Song. Boston: College Hill; 1987. p.375–400.
  3. Hixon TJ, Weismer G, Hoit JD, eds. Preclinical speech science: Anatomy, physiology, acoustics, and perception. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2018.
  4. Zraick RI, Smith-Olinde L, Shotts LL. Adult normative data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600. J Voice 2012; 26(2): 164–76. [CrossRef] Winkworth AL, Davis PJ, Ellis E, Adams RD. Variability and consistency in speech breathing during reading: lung volumes, speech intensity, and linguistic factors. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37(3): 535–56.
  5. Hodge MM, Putnam Rochet A. Characteristics of Speech Breathing in Young Women. JSLHR 1989; 32(3): 466–80. [CrossRef] Sezin RK, Özcebe E, Aydinli FE, Köse A, Günaydin RÖ. Investigation of the Effectiveness of a Holistic Vocal Training Program Designed to Preserve Theatre Students’ Vocal Health and Increase Their Vocal Performances; A Prospective Research Study. J Voice. 2018 Sep 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.08.009. [Epub ahead of print]. [CrossRef] Gartner-Schmidt JL, Hirai R, Dastolfo C, Rosen CA, Yu L, Gillespie AI. Phonatory aerodynamics in connected speech. Laryngoscope 2015; 125(12): 2764–71. [CrossRef] Kiliç MA, Okur E, Yildirim I, Oğüt F, Denizoğlu I, Kizilay A, et al. [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index]. [Article in Turkish] Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2008; 18(3): 139–47.
  6. Özcebe E, Aydinli FE, Tiğrak TK, İncebay Ö, Yilmaz T. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). J Voice 2019; 33(3): 382.e1-382.e10. Behrman A. Speech and voice science. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural publishing; 2017. Hacettepe University Course Catalog/ECTS Information Package. Available from: URL: http://akts.hace