SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Inquiry / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

WHICH FIRMS OUTPERFORM THE OTHERS UNDER UNCERTAINTY: REVISITING MILES AND SNOW TYPOLOGY

HANGİ FİRMALAR BELİRSİZLİK ALTINDA DAHA İYİ PERFORMANS GÖSTERİYOR: MİLES VE SNOW’UN STRATEJİ TİPOLOJİLERİNE YENİDEN BAKIŞ

Mehlika SARAÇ
Pages
261–285
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to investigate the strategic behavior of organizations (based on Miles and Snow’s Typology) in metal products and machinery industry and find out which strategy outperform the others in terms of performance (ROA) under uncertainty during the crisis time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Economic crisis are the most transformative events that create uncertain environment for the firms. 2008 Global Financial Crisis was one of the worst financial crises since the Great Depression of the 1930s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has affected organizations in Turkey mostly in 2008 and 2009 and has caused a highly uncertain environment for firms from all industries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to investigate the strategic behavior of organizations (based on Miles and Snow’s Typology) in metal products and machinery industry and find out which strategy outperform the others in terms of performance (ROA) under uncertainty during the crisis time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Stratejik Davranış · Miles ve Snow’un Strateji Tipolojisi · Belirsizlik

Abstract

Economic crisis are the most transformative events that create uncertain environment for the firms. 2008 Global Financial Crisis was one of the worst financial crises since the Great Depression of the 1930s. It has affected organizations in Turkey mostly in 2008 and 2009 and has caused a highly uncertain environment for firms from all industries. Although faced to very similar conditions, organizations responded to crisis differently and had different consequences. The aim of this study is to investigate the strategic behavior of organizations (based on Miles and Snow’s Typology) in metal products and machinery industry and find out which strategy outperform the others in terms of performance (ROA) under uncertainty during the crisis time.

Özet

Ekonomik krizler, firmalar için belirsiz bir ortam yaratan oldukça dönüştürücü olaylardır. 1930'ların Büyük Buhranından bu yana yaşanan ve en büyük finansal krizlerden biri olarak görülen 2008 Küresel Mali Krizi, 2008 ve 2009 yıllarında da Türkiye'deki kurumları etkilemiş, tüm sektörlerden firmalar için oldukça belirsiz bir ortam yaratmıştır. Çok benzer koşullar ile karşı karşıya olmalarına rağmen, kuruluşlar krize farklı tepkiler vermiş ve farklı sonuçlar elde etmişlerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı metal ürünler ve makine endüstrisindeki kuruluşların stratejik davranışlarını (Miles ve Snow’un strateji tipolojisine dayalı olarak) incelemek ve kriz zamanındaki belirsizlik altında hangi stratejinin daha iyi bir şirket performansı (ROA) yarattığını araştırmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇ, M. (2019). WHICH FIRMS OUTPERFORM THE OTHERS UNDER UNCERTAINTY: REVISITING MILES AND SNOW TYPOLOGY. International Journal of Social Inquiry, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 261–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/159435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ansoff, H. Igor (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw Hill. Bacot, L. Marie; Hartman, Sandra J.; Lundberg, Olof H. (1992). “Adaptive Strategies and Survival in An Environment Dominated By Economic Decline”. Journal of Applied Business Research, 9(1), 34-44.
  2. Barney, Jay (1991). “The Resource-Based View of Strategy: Origins, Implications, and Prospects”. Journal of Management, 17, 97-211.
  3. Bentley, Kathleen A.; Omer, Thomas C.; Sharp, Nathan Y. (2013). “Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2). 780-817.
  4. Bigelow, Ronald; Peng, S. Chan (1992). “Managing in Difficult Times: Lessons from the Most Recent Recession”. Management Decision, 30(8). 34-42.
  5. Blackmore, Karen; Nesbitt, Keith (2013). “Verifying the Miles and Snow Strategy Types in Australian Small-And Medium-Size Enterprises”. Australian Journal of Management, 38(1), 171-190.
  6. Bohman, Håkan; Lindfors, Maj-Britt Johansson (1998). “Management for Change: On Strategic Change during Recession”. Journal of Business Research, 41(1), 57-60.
  7. Carbonara, Gabriele; Rosa, Caiazza (2010). “How to Turn Crisis into Opportunity: Perception and Reaction to High Level of Uncertainty in Banking Industry”. Foresight, 12(4), 37-46.
  8. Chattopadhyay, Prithviraj; Glick, William H.; Huber, George P. (2001). “Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities”. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 937-955.
  9. Child, John (1972). “Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice”. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.
  10. DeSarbo, Wayne S.C.; Di Benedetto, Anthony; Song, Michael; Sinha, Indrajit (2005). “Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance”. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 47-74.
  11. Di Benedetto, C. Anthony; Song, Michael (2003). “The Relationship between Strategic Type and Firm Capabilities in Chinese Firms”. International Marketing Review, 20(5), 514-533.
  12. Dugal, Sanjiv S.; Graham, K. Morbey (1995). “Revisiting Corporate R&D Spending During A Recession”. Research Technology Management, 38(4), 23-7.
  13. Duncan, Robert B. (1972). “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-27.
  14. Fiss, Peer C. (2011). “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies İn Organization Research”. Academy of Management