Journals / Çocuk Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Çocuk Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Kateter İlişkili Kan Dolaşımı Enfeksiyonları

Pages
42–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Five of these patients (13.8%) died due to central line-associated bloodstream infection, 27 (25%) of them had central venous catheter and 9 (6%) of them did not (p=0.001).Conclusion: In conclusion, central line-associated bloodstream infection is one of the serious healthcare-associated infections, and it is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in PICUs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of central line-associated bloodstream infections, risk factors, their relationship with catheter insertion location, and the effect of central line-associated bloodstream infections on mortality and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) length of stay.Methods: This was a prospective, observational and cohort study, carried out between November 2009 and February 2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During this period, all the patients who had central-line were monitored for central line-associated bloodstream infection.Results: In the study period, 275 patients were admitted to our PICU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Five of these patients (13.8%) died due to central line-associated bloodstream infection, 27 (25%) of them had central venous catheter and 9 (6%) of them did not (p=0.001).Conclusion: In conclusion, central line-associated bloodstream infection is one of the serious healthcare-associated infections, and it is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in PICUs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of central line-associated bloodstream infections, risk factors, their relationship with catheter insertion location, and the effect of central line-associated bloodstream infections on mortality and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) length of stay.Methods: This was a prospective, observational and cohort study, carried out between November 2009 and February 2011. During this period, all the patients who had central-line were monitored for central line-associated bloodstream infection.Results: In the study period, 275 patients were admitted to our PICU. The frequency of invasive device usage was 38.9% (107) for central venous catheter, 38.2% (105) for mechanical ventilation, 53.3% (147) for urinary catheter, and 11.3% (32) for artery line. Central lineassociated bloodstream infection was detected in 16 (14.8%) of the patients and 23 central line-associated bloodstream infection attacks were observed. There were 14 central line-associated bloodstream infection attacks in 1.000 central venous catheter usage days. There were 168 patients without central venous catheter and 4 (2.4%) of them had blood stream infection. Thirty-six patients died and the mortality rate was 13%. Five of these patients (13.8%) died due to central line-associated bloodstream infection, 27 (25%) of them had central venous catheter and 9 (6%) of them did not (p=0.001).Conclusion: In conclusion, central line-associated bloodstream infection is one of the serious healthcare-associated infections, and it is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in PICUs.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kateter ilişkili kan dolaşımı enfeksiyonlarının sıklığını, risk faktörlerini, kateter yerleştirme yerleri ile olan ilişkisini, ayrıca bu enfeksiyonların mortalite ve çocuk yoğun bakım ünitesi (ÇYBÜ) kalış süresine olan etkisini belirlemektir.Yöntemler: Kasım 2009 ve Şubat 2011 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilen ileriye yönelik ve gözlemsel bir kohort çalışmasıdır. Bu tarihler arasında, ünitemizde santral venöz kateteri olan tüm hastalar çalışmaya alındı. Bulgular: Bu dönemde, ÇYBÜ'de 275 hasta izlendi. İnvazif cihaz kullanım sıklığı; %38,9 (107) santral venöz kateter, %38,2 (105) mekanik ventilasyon, %53,3 (147) idrar kateteri ve %11,3 (32) arter kateteri idi. Hastaların 16'sında (%14,8) (23 atak) kateter ilişkili kan dolaşımı enfeksiyonu saptandı. Bin santral venöz kateter kullanım gününde 14 enfeksiyon atağı gözlemlendi. Santral venöz kateteri olmayan 168 hastanın ise 4 (%2,4) tanesinde kan dolaşımı enfeksiyonu saptandı. Hastaların 36'sı öldü, mortalite oranı %13 idi. Bu hastalardan 5'i (%13,8) kateter ilişkili kan dolaşımı enfeksiyonu nedeniyle öldü, 27'sinde (%25) santral venöz kateter varken, 9'unda (%6) yoktu (p=0,001).Sonuç: Kateter ilişkili kan dolaşımı enfeksiyonları, hastane ilişkili enfeksiyonlar içinde en ciddi olanlardan biridir ve ÇYBÜ'deki morbidite ve mortalitenin de önemli bir nedenidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KENDİRLİ, T., YAMAN, A., ÖDEK, Ç., ÖZDEMİR, H., KARBUZ, A., ALDEMİR, B., GÜRİZ, H., ATEŞ, C., ÖZSOY, G., AYSEV, D., ÇİFTÇİ, E., İNCE, E. (2017). Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Çocuk Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 42–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/159335

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Wheeler DS, Giaccone MJ, Hutchinson N, Haygood M, Bondurant P. A hospital-wide quality-improvement collaborative to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections. Pediatrics. 2011;128:995-1004
  2. Miller MR, Griswold M, Harris JM, Yenokyan G, Huskins WC, et al. Decreasing PICU catheter-associated bloodstream infections: NACHRI's quality transformation efforts. Pediatrics. 2010;125:206- 12
  3. Srinivasan A, Wise M, Bell M. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: Central line-associated blood stream infections-United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:243-8
  4. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, Banerjee S, Allen-Bridson K, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:783-805
  5. Huskins WC. Quality improvement interventions to prevent healthcare-associated infections in neonates and children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24:103-12
  6. Advani S, Reich NG, Sengupta A, Gosey L, Milstone AM. Central line-associated bloodstream infection in hospitalized children with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: extending risk analyses outside the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1108-15
  7. Odetola FO, Moler FW, Dechert RE, VanDerElzen K, Chenoweth C. Nosocomial catheter-related bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit: risk and rates associated with various intravascular technologies. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4:432-6
  8. Urrea M, Pons M, Serra M, Latorre C, Palomeque A. Prospective incidence study of nosocomial infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22:490-3
  9. Yogaraj JS, Elward AM, Fraser VJ. Rate, risk factors and outcomes of nosocomial primary bloodstream infection in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatrics. 2002;110:481-5
  10. Tomlinson D, Mermel LA, Ethier MC, Matlow A, Gillmeister B, et al. Defining bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:697-710
  11. Wagner M, Bonhoeffer J, Erb TO, Glanzmann R, Häcker FM, et al. Prospective study on central venous line associated bloodstream infections. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96:827-31
  12. Nowak JE, Brilli RJ, Lake MR, Sparling KW, Butcher J, et al. Reducing catheter-associated bloodstream infections in the pediatric intensive care unit: Business case for quality improvement. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;1