SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2014 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

An overview to the transformation of urban spaces in the context of public deliberation and public relations in the process of neoliberalism

Neoliberalizm sürecinde kentsel mekânların dönüşümüne kamusal müzakere ve halkla ilişkiler açısından bakış

A. Fulya ŞEN
Pages
1–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is analyzed as the practices of public relations of the Municipality of Beyoglu concerning Emek Cinema project in terms of COPR model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to discuss the effects of neoliberal urbanization process on the urban spaces and creating function of a dynamic public sphere and the contributi- ons of the process of the deliberative participation of public relations on the basis of de- liberative democracy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The model of “Consensus-Oriented Public Relations” (COPR) ba- sed on Habermas’s the Theory of Communicative Action (TCA) is used as an analytical framework for the planning and evaluation processes of public relations in situations of conflict.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is analyzed as the practices of public relations of the Municipality of Beyoglu concerning Emek Cinema project in terms of COPR model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the effects of neoliberal urbanization process on the urban spaces and creating function of a dynamic public sphere and the contributi- ons of the process of the deliberative participation of public relations on the basis of de- liberative democracy. In addition, the demolishing process of the Emek Cinema which is an issue of the public deliberation and takes part in centre of the process of neolibe- ral urbanization has been focused on the transformation ways of reconciliation through public deliberation. The model of “Consensus-Oriented Public Relations” (COPR) ba- sed on Habermas’s the Theory of Communicative Action (TCA) is used as an analytical framework for the planning and evaluation processes of public relations in situations of conflict. It is analyzed as the practices of public relations of the Municipality of Beyoglu concerning Emek Cinema project in terms of COPR model.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, neoliberal kentleşme sürecinin kentsel mekânlar üzerindeki etkile- rinin ve kamusal tartışma/müzakereci demokrasi kavramları temelinde halkla ilişkilerin dinamik bir kamusal alan oluşturma işlevinin ve müzakereci katılım sürecine katkıları- nın tartışılması amaçlanmıştır. Ayrıca, neoliberal kentleşme sürecinin odağında yer alan ve kamusal bir tartışmaya konu olan Emek Sineması’nın yıkılması sürecinin kamu- sal müzakere yoluyla uzlaşıma dönüşme yolları üzerinde durulmuştur. Habermas’ın ile- tişimsel eylem kuramına dayanan “Consensus-Oriented Public Relations” (COPR) mo- deli, çatışma durumlarında halkla ilişkilerin planlama ve değerlendirme aşamaları için analitik bir çerçeve olarak kullanılmıştır. Beyoğlu Belediyesi'nin Emek Sineması proje- sine ilişkin halkla ilişkiler uygulamaları COPR modeline göre çözümlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, A. F. (2014). An overview to the transformation of urban spaces in the context of public deliberation and public relations in the process of neoliberalism. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 1–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/159315

References (19)

  1. Alford, Robert R.-Friedland, Roger (1985). Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State and Democracy, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bherer, Laurence (2010), “Succesful and Unsuccesful Participatory Arrangements: Why is There a Participatory Movement at the Local Level?”, Journal Of Urban Affaırs, Volume 32, Number 3, s. 287–303.
  3. Brenner, Neil-Theodore, Nik (2004). “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’ ”, Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, N. Brenner and N. Theodore (Edited by), Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Brenner, Neil-Theodore, Nik (2005), “Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition”, City, Vol. 9, No.1, s.101-107.
  4. Buhmann, Alexander (2011), Applying Habermas’ Theory to Public Relations: Potentials and Challenges, http://dokumentix.ub.unisiegen.de/opus/volltexte/2011/517/pdf/buhmann.pdf, (10/01/2013).
  5. Burkart, Roland (1994), “Consensus Oriented Public Relations as a Solution To the Landfill Conflict”, Waste Management & Research,12, s.223–232.
  6. Burkart, Roland (2004), “Consensus-oriented public relations (COPR): A concept for planning and evaluation of public relations”, Public Relations and Communication Management in Europe: A Nation-By-Nation Introduction to Public Relations Theory and Practice, Betteke Van Ruler, Dejan Vercic (Eds.), Walter de Gruyter GmbH&Co., Berlin, s. 459-465.
  7. Burkart, Roland (2007), “On Jürgen Habermas and public relations”, Public Relations Review, Vol.33, s.249-254.
  8. Candan, Ayfer Bartu-Kolluoğlu, Biray (2008), “Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing Project in İstanbul”, New Perspectives on Turkey, No. 39, s. 5-46.
  9. Erdoğan, İrfan (2006),
  10. Teori ve Pratikte Halkla İlişkiler, Ankara:
  11. Erk Yayınları.
  12. Flynn, Jeffrey (2004), “Communicative Power in Habermas's Theory of Democracy”, European Journal of Political Theory, 3(4), s.433–454.
  13. Grunig, James-Hunt, Todd (1984),
  14. Managing Public Relations, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Grunig, James-Grunig, Larissa (1992). “Models of Public Relations and Communication”, Excellence in Public Relations, Der. James Grunig, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Habermas, Jürgen (2000),
  15. Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü, Tanıl Bora-Mithat Sancar (Çev.), İletişim Yayınları,
  16. İstanbul.
  17. Habermas, Jürgen (2001),
  18. İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı I-II, Mustafa Tüzel (Çev.), İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, (Original Book Published in 1984, 1987).
  19. Harvey, David (1978), “The Urban Process under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis”