SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2025 / Volume: 14 Issue: 2

MARKET REACTIONS TO POLITICAL TRANSITIONS: THE TAKAICHI ELECTION AND JAPANESE FINANCIAL MARKETS

Habib Badawi(Lebanese University)0000-0002-6452-8379
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Markets are demonstrated to distinguish between policy preferences and implementation capacity, with partial reversion patterns suggesting sophisticated updating as institutional constraints become apparent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- The relationship between political leadership transitions and measurable market volatility through policy expectation shifts is examined, with specific analysis of the financial market response to Sanae Takaichi's October 2025 election as Japan's Liberal Democratic Party leader.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bloomberg Terminal data for the Nikkei 225, JPY/USD exchange rates, and Japanese Government Bond yields over a 250-day estimation window are analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Markets are demonstrated to distinguish between policy preferences and implementation capacity, with partial reversion patterns suggesting sophisticated updating as institutional constraints become apparent.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:political uncertainty · event study · Japanese financial markets

Abstract

Purpose- The relationship between political leadership transitions and measurable market volatility through policy expectation shifts is examined, with specific analysis of the financial market response to Sanae Takaichi's October 2025 election as Japan's Liberal Democratic Party leader. Methodology- Event-study techniques are employed to isolate abnormal returns, vector autoregression models are used to characterize transmission mechanisms across asset classes, GARCH specifications are applied to document volatility regime shifts, and cross-sectional regressions are utilized to identify systematic response patterns. Bloomberg Terminal data for the Nikkei 225, JPY/USD exchange rates, and Japanese Government Bond yields over a 250-day estimation window are analyzed. Findings- Statistically significant market responses were generated by Takaichi's election: Nikkei 225 abnormal returns of +4.7% (t = 8.7, p < 0.001), yen depreciation of 1.7%, and bond yield compression of 8 basis points were observed. Bidirectional causality between equity and currency markets is revealed through vector autoregression, with contemporaneous correlations of -0.75. Export-oriented firms outperformed by 1.8 percentage points, confirming currency depreciation expectations. Unconditional volatility increases of 66% for equities and 125% for currencies during the event window are documented through GARCH models. Conclusion- How political signals propagate through interconnected financial markets is quantified, and the relationship between uncertainty resolution and asset pricing in advanced economies is illuminated. Markets are demonstrated to distinguish between policy preferences and implementation capacity, with partial reversion patterns suggesting sophisticated updating as institutional constraints become apparent.

🔖

Cite This Article

Badawi, H. (2025). MARKET REACTIONS TO POLITICAL TRANSITIONS: THE TAKAICHI ELECTION AND JAPANESE FINANCIAL MARKETS. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Volume: 14 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2023

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Apel, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2022). Central bank independence and market volatility during political transitions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 119, 102-118.
  2. Badawi, H. (2025, October 5). Sanae Takaichi: Economic revivalism & traditionalist. LinkedIn-IDR Newsletter. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sanae-takaichi-economic-revivalism-traditionalist-habib-al-badawi-oztbf/
  3. Bekaert, G., Hoerova, M., & Lo Duca, M. (2022). Risk, uncertainty and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 126, 89-106.
  4. Bernhard, W., & Leblang, D. (2006). Democratic processes and financial markets: Pricing politics. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bianchi, F., Lettau, M., & Ludvigson, S. C. (2023). Monetary policy and asset valuation. Journal of Finance, 77(2), 967-1017.
  6. Boehmer, E., Musumeci, J., & Poulsen, A. B. (1991). Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance. Journal of Financial Economics, 30(2), 253-272.
  7. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
  8. Boutchkova, M., Doshi, H., Durnev, A., & Molchanov, A. (2012). Precarious politics and return volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 25(4), 1111-1154.
  9. Brogaard, J., Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2021). High-frequency trading and price discovery. Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2267-2306.
  10. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
  11. Cookson, J. A., Engelberg, J. E., & Mullins, W. (2023). Does partisanship shape investor beliefs? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 863-893.
  12. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007.
  13. Hansen, S., & McMahon, M. (2022). Shocking language: Understanding the macroeconomic effects of central bank communication. Journal of International Economics, 138, 103-119.
  14. Hausman, J. K., & Wieland, J. F. (2014). Abenomics: Preliminary analysis and outlook. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2014(1), 1-63.
  15. Herron, M. C., Lavin, J., Cram, D., & Silver, J. (2020). Partisan differences in willingness to social distance. Political Research Quarterly, 73(4), 696-709.
  16. Ke, Z. T., Kelly, B. T., & Xiu, D. (2024). Predicting returns with text data. Journal of Financial Economics, 152, 103-126.
  17. Kuroda, H. (2016, February 16). Quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with a negative interest rate [Speech]. Bank of Japan.
  18. Lutkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer.
  19. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39.
  20. Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2021). Coalition government and political communication. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(1), 138- 156.
  21. Miyajima, K., & Shim, I. (2023). Asset managers in emerging market economies. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2023, 47-64.
  22. Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2020). Political cycles and stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 128(11), 4011-4045.
  23. Reuters. (2025). (.N225) | Stock price & latest news. Retrieved October 8, 2025, from https://www.reuters.com/markets/quote/.N225/
  24. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.