Journals / Alternatif Politika / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

THE MASCULINE LANGUAGE OF THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (IR) AND THE PERCEPTIONS OF WOMEN IR ACADEMICS IN TURKEY ABOUT THE LANGUAGE OF THE DISCIPLINE

ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER (Uİ) DİSİPLİNİNİN ERİL DİLİ VE TÜRKİYE’DE KADIN Uİ AKADEMİSYENLERİNİN DİSİPLİNİN ERİL DİLİNE BAKIŞLARI

Pages
361–384
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Particularly the perceptions of women IR academics about the masculine language of the IR discipline and the issue of masculinisation of women IR academics are tried to be analysed by semi-structured in-depth interviews which may be the basis for further research in this field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research the perceptions of women IR academics who work at the universities in the Marmara region, about masculine language of IR discipline will be analysed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although women academics have been becoming more dominant components of the IR discipline, there is not enough research on how they perceive IR discipline and particularly the masculine language of the IR discipline.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Particularly the perceptions of women IR academics about the masculine language of the IR discipline and the issue of masculinisation of women IR academics are tried to be analysed by semi-structured in-depth interviews which may be the basis for further research in this field.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research the perceptions of women IR academics who work at the universities in the Marmara region, about masculine language of IR discipline will be analysed. Although women academics have been becoming more dominant components of the IR discipline, there is not enough research on how they perceive IR discipline and particularly the masculine language of the IR discipline. With this research, the goal is to fill this gap to a certain extent. Particularly the perceptions of women IR academics about the masculine language of the IR discipline and the issue of masculinisation of women IR academics are tried to be analysed by semi-structured in-depth interviews which may be the basis for further research in this field.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Marmara bölgesindeki üniversitelerde Uİ alanında çalışan kadın akademisyenlerin Uİ disiplininin eril diline ve kadın akademisyenlerin erilleşmesi konusuna bakışları değerlendirilmektedir. Uİ disiplini giderek kadın akademisyenlerin ağırlık kazanmaya başladığı bir alan olmasına rağmen kadın Uİ akademisyenlerinin disipline, özellikle de disiplinin eril diline nasıl yaklaştıkları konusunda yeterli araştırma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmayla mevcut araştırmalardaki boşluğun bir ölçüde doldurulup, kadın Uİ akademisyenlerinin Uİ disiplininin eril diline bakışları ve kadın akademisyenlerin erilleşmesi meselesine yaklaşımları yarı yapılandırılmış derinlemesine görüşmelerle incelenerek yeni araştırmalar için bir zemin hazırlama hedefi güdülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNER, S., ÖZDEMİRKIRAN, M. (2017). THE MASCULINE LANGUAGE OF THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (IR) AND THE PERCEPTIONS OF WOMEN IR ACADEMICS IN TURKEY ABOUT THE LANGUAGE OF THE DISCIPLINE. Alternatif Politika, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 361–384. https://ajindex.com/articles/159034

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aydın-Koyuncu, Çiğdem (2012), “Feminist Uİ Yaklaşımları Açısından Güvenlik Konusunun Analizi”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 67 (1): 111-139.
  2. Blanchard, Eric M. (2003), “Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory”, Signs, 28 (4): 1289-1312.
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre, (1998), La domination masculine (Paris: Seuil) Çakır, Serpil ve Necla Akgökçe (1996), Farklı Feminizmler Açısından Kadın Araştırmalarında Yöntem (İstanbul: Sel Yay.). Doğan, Fazlı ve Duygu Özlük (2016), “Feminist Uİ ve Uİ Eleştirisi: Cinsiyet, Devlet ve Güvenlik”, Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 16 (32): 53-70.
  4. Donovan, Josephine (2007), Feminist Teori (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları). Elshtain, Jean B. (1987), Woman and War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Enloe, Cynthia (1993), The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press). Graddol David ve Joan Swann (1989), Gender Voices (Oxford: Basil Blackwell). Lakoff, Robin T. (1975), Language and the Women’s Place (Oxford: Oxford University Press). MacKay, Donald (1983), “Prescriptive Grammar and the Pronoun Problem”, Thorne, Barrie, Cheris Kramarae ve Nancy Henley (Der.), Language, Gender and Society (Rowley: Newbury House): 38-54.
  5. Martyna, Wendy (1983), “Beyond the He/Man Approach: the Case for Non-sexist Language”, Thorne, Barrie, Cheris Kramarae ve Nancy Henley (Der.), Language, Gender and Society (Newbury House: Rowley), 25-37. O’Barr, William M. ve Bowman K. Atkins (1998), “‘Women’s Language’ or ‘Powerless Language’?”, Coates, Jennifer (Der.), Language and Gender: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing): 93-110.
  6. Özdemirkıran, Merve ve Selcen Öner (2017), “Türkiye’de Kadın Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenlerinin Profili: Marmara Bölgesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Kadın Sorunları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Fe Dergi: Feminist Eleştiri, 9 (1): 92-112.
  7. Sağlamer, Gülsün (2009), “Women Academics in Science and Technology with Special Reference to Turkey”, L. Ambrosi, G.Trisori-Liuzzi (Der.), Women Status in the Mediterranean: Their Rights and Sustainable Development, CIHEAM: Options Mediterraneennes, No.87. Scott, Joan W. (1999), Gender and the Politics of History (New York: Columbia University Press). Sylvester, Christine (1994), Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Şentürk, Burcu (2015), “Çokuz ama Yokuz: Türkiye’deki Akademisyen Kadınlar Üzerine Bir Ana