Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Relationships Between Stereoscopic Non-Mydriatic Retinal Camera, Nerve Fiber Layer and Visual Field Parameters in Different Stages of Glaucoma

Pages
149–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The DDLS stage and vertical C/D obtained by NMRC are useful parameters in the monitoring glaucoma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To investigate the relationships between stereoscopic non-mydriatic retinal camera (NMRC), retinal nerve fi ber layer thickness (RNFLT), and visual fi eld (VF) parameters in different stages of glaucoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 112 eyes from 112 patients with glaucoma which were grouped according to the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) obtained by the NMRC: DDLS stage 1 (group 1, n=11), DDLS stage 2 (group 2, n=48), and DDLS stage 3 (group 3, n=53).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The DDLS stage and vertical C/D obtained by NMRC are useful parameters in the monitoring glaucoma.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: To investigate the relationships between stereoscopic non-mydriatic retinal camera (NMRC), retinal nerve fi ber layer thickness (RNFLT), and visual fi eld (VF) parameters in different stages of glaucoma. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 112 eyes from 112 patients with glaucoma which were grouped according to the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) obtained by the NMRC: DDLS stage 1 (group 1, n=11), DDLS stage 2 (group 2, n=48), and DDLS stage 3 (group 3, n=53). Data of NMRC, RNFLT, and VF were compared and correlated. Results: All RNFLT measurements revealed that the group 3 had signifi cantly lower values in all sections (p<0.05 for all). The VF measurements revealed that although the mean deviation (MD) values were higher in the group 3, this difference was not statistically signifi cant (p=0.08). However, Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish (HAP) score was signifi cantly higher in the group 3 (p<0.01). The DDLS stage was signifi cantly correlated with MD (p<0.01, r=0.30), HAP score (p<0.01, r=0.35), and all RNFLT measurements (p<0.05 for all, r between -0.22 and -0.36). The vertical cup to disc (C/D) ratio was also signifi cantly correlated with MD (p<0.01, r=0.38), HAP score (p<0.01, r=0.36), and all RNFLT measurements (p<0.05 for all, r between -0.30 and -0.48). Conclusion: All the NMRC, RNFLT, and the VF measurements are comparable and discriminative devices in staging glaucoma. The DDLS stage and vertical C/D obtained by NMRC are useful parameters in the monitoring glaucoma.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOYLU, M. T., AKINCIOGLU, D., MUTLU, F. M. (2020). Relationships Between Stereoscopic Non-Mydriatic Retinal Camera, Nerve Fiber Layer and Visual Field Parameters in Different Stages of Glaucoma. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 149–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/158875

References (14)

  1. Klamann M, Grünert A, Maier A-K, et al. Comparison of functional and morphological diagnostics in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Ophthalmic Res. 2013;49: 192- 8
  2. Danesh-Meyer H, Gaskin B, Jayusundera T, et al. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:437-41
  3. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262-7
  4. Han JW, Cho SY, Kang KD. Correlation betwe en optic nerve parameters obtained using 3D nonmydriatic retinal camera and optical coherence tomography: interobserver a greement on the disc damage likelihood scale. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:931738
  5. Yokoyama Y, Tanito M, Nitta K, et al. Stereoscopic analysis of optic nerve head parameters in primary open angle glaucoma: the glaucoma stereo analysis study. PloS One. 2014;9:e99138
  6. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fi ber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous fi eld loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:77-83
  7. Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, et al. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual fi eld damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:758-63
  8. Wolfs RC, Ramrattan RS, Hofman A, et al. Cup-to-disc ratio: ophthalmoscopy versus automated measurement in a general population: The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1597-601
  9. Alhadeff PA, De Moraes CG, Chen M, et al. The association between clinical features seen on fundus photographs and glaucomatous damage detected on visual fi elds and optical coherence tomography scans. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:498-504
  10. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:215-21
  11. Sharma A, Oakley JD, Schiffman JC, et al. Comparison of automated analysis of Cirrus HD OCT spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with stereo photographs of the optic disc. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1348-57
  12. Lisboa R, Leite MT, Zangwill LM, et al. Diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2261-9
  13. Asakawa K, Kato S, Shoji N, et al. Evaluation of Optic Nerve Head Using a Newly Developed Stereo Retinal Imaging Technique by Glaucoma Specialist and Non–Expert-Certifi ed Orthoptist. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:698-706
  14. Emeç Durgut S, Şatana B, Doğan E, et al. Correlation Betw