Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Impact of Valsalva Maneuver on Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber, Macular, Optic Nerve Parameters and Choroidal Thickness in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Patients

Pages
99–105
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The changes in RNFL and CT have to be in mind during patient examination due to thein fl uence of VM

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate impact of Valsalva maneuver on central corneal thickness, anterior chamber parameters, optic nerve parameters and macular-choroidal thickness of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEG) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Fifty-three eyes of 30 patients with PEG were included in this study between January 2017 and August 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The changes in RNFL and CT have to be in mind during patient examination due to thein fl uence of VM
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: To evaluate impact of Valsalva maneuver on central corneal thickness, anterior chamber parameters, optic nerve parameters and macular-choroidal thickness of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEG) patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three eyes of 30 patients with PEG were included in this study between January 2017 and August 2017. All patients under went optic disc, retinal nerve fi ber layer (OD RNFL), central macular thickness (CMT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT) measurements performed by Spectral Domain Optic CoherenceTomography (SD-OCT); irido corneal angle (ICA), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements were performed with Sirius Scheimpfl ug-Placido Topographer before and during Valsalva maneuver (VM). Results: OD RNFL parameters were signifi cantly decreased during the VM (82.1±21.5 μm before VM, 81.6±21.2 μm during VM, p‹0.034). There were decrease in parameters of CMT (218.9±25 μm before VM, 217.5±24 μm during VM p=0.83), ICA (42.5°±9 before VM, 42.0°±9 during VM , p=0.188) and ACD (3.39±0.6 mm before VM, 3.38±0.6 mm during VM , p=0.082) but these impacts were not signifi cant. There was signifi cantly increase in parameters of subfoveal CT during VM (213.3±40.9 μm before and 224.0±40.0 μm during VM; p‹0.001 ). There was increase in parameters of CCT but this impactwas not signifi cant (536.2±33.5 μm before VM , 537.5±35.8 μm during VM , p=0.237). Conclusions: The VM has some infl uence on corneal morphology and anterior chamber parameters, but they were not signifi cant. The changes in RNFL and CT have to be in mind during patient examination due to thein fl uence of VM

🔖

Cite This Article

DOGAN, M., ALIZADA, A. A., OZDAMAR, E. N., SABANER, M. C., YAZGAN, S., KUSBECI, T. (2020). Impact of Valsalva Maneuver on Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber, Macular, Optic Nerve Parameters and Choroidal Thickness in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Patients. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 99–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/158871

References (16)

  1. Yannoff M, Duker JS, Lahners W, et al. Pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. In Ophthalmology 2004;1499-503
  2. Schlötzer-Schrehardht UM, Koca MR, Naumann GO, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ocular manifestation of a systemic disorder. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1752-63
  3. Keshgegian AA. Pseudoexfoliative fi brillopathy in visceral organs of a patient with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1757-62
  4. Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Hourihan F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1319-24
  5. Drolsum L, Haaskiold E, Sandvig K. Phacoemulsifi cation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:787-92
  6. García Fernández M, Navarro JC, Castaño CG. Long-term evolution of Valsalva retinopathy: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:346
  7. Zebrowska A, Gasior Z, Jastrzebski D. Cardiovascular effects of the Valsalva maneuver during static arm exercise in elite power lifting athletes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;755:335–42
  8. Rafuse PE, Mills DW, Hooper PL, et al. Effects of Valsalva’s manoeuvre on intraocular pressure. Can J Ophthalmol 1994;29:73-6
  9. Aykan U, Erdurmus M, Yılmaz B, et al. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude variations during the Valsalva maneuver. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:1183-6
  10. Wang BS, Xiao L, Liu J, et al. Dynamic changes in anterior segment morphology during the Valsalva maneuver assessed with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7286-9
  11. Dada T, Gutta V, Deepak KK, et al. Narrowing of the anterior chamber angle during Valsalva maneuver: a possible mechanism of angle closure. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16:81- 91
  12. Porth CJ, Bamrah VS, Tristani FE, et al. The Valsalva maneuver: mechanisms and clinical implications. Heart Lung 1984;13:507-18
  13. Luster EA, Baumgartner N, Adams WC, et al. Effects of hypovolemia and posture on responses to the Valsalva maneuver. Aviat Space Environ Med 1996;67:308-13
  14. Pekel G, Acer S, Yagcı R, et al. Impact of Valsalva maneuver on corneal morphology and anterior chamber parameters. Cornea 2014;33:271-3
  15. Falcão M, Vieira M, Brito P, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the choroid during Valsalva maneuver. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154:687-92
  16. Li X, Wang W, Chen S, et al. Effects of Valsalva Maneuver on Anterior Chamber Parameters and Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Chinese: An AS-OCT and SS-OCT Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:189