SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EURO Politika / 2024 / Sayı: 2

U.S. Relations With Cyprus: From NATO Protection to Status Quoist Perspective

ABD'nin Kıbrıs Politikası: NATO Korumacılığından Statükocu Bakış Açısına

Ramazan Safa(Adam Mickiewicz University)0000-0002-1629-5283
Pages
25–36
Publication Date
2025-01-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article comprehensively examines the Cyprus issue, highlighting the interplay of historical grievances, ethnic divisions and international diplomacy that shape the island’s present and future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Deeply rooted in historical, ethnic and geopolitical complexities, the Cyprus issue has long been a challenge to regional stability in the Eastern Mediterranean.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The lifting of the US embargo on military sales to Cyprus is analyzed as a strategic maneuver aimed at countering the Russian presence and strengthening American interests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article comprehensively examines the Cyprus issue, highlighting the interplay of historical grievances, ethnic divisions and international diplomacy that shape the island’s present and future.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ABD dış politikası · Kıbrıs Sorunu · NATO

Abstract

Deeply rooted in historical, ethnic and geopolitical complexities, the Cyprus issue has long been a challenge to regional stability in the Eastern Mediterranean. This article examines the evolution of the Cyprus issue, with particular emphasis on the role of the United States. Initially shaped by Cold War dynamics and the need to prevent conflict between NATO members Greece and Turkey, US intervention has evolved in response to changing geopolitical realities, including the growing influence of Russia in the region. The lifting of the US embargo on military sales to Cyprus is analyzed as a strategic maneuver aimed at countering the Russian presence and strengthening American interests. Despite these efforts, the path to a lasting solution remains challenging, as deep-rooted divisions between Greek and Turkish Cypriots, combined with complex international interests, continue to hinder progress. This article comprehensively examines the Cyprus issue, highlighting the interplay of historical grievances, ethnic divisions and international diplomacy that shape the island’s present and future.

Özet

Tarihsel, etnik ve jeopolitik karmaşıklıklara derinden kök salmış Kıbrıs sorunu, Doğu Akdeniz'deki bölgesel istikrar için uzun zamandır bir zorluk teşkil etmektedir. Bu makale, özellikle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nin rolüne vurgu yaparak Kıbrıs sorununun evrimini incelemektedir. Başlangıçta Soğuk Savaş dinamikleri ve NATO üyeleri Yunanistan ve Türkiye arasındaki çatışmayı önleme ihtiyacı tarafından şekillendirilen ABD'nin müdahalesi, bölgedeki Rusya'nın artan etkisi de dahil olmak üzere değişen jeopolitik gerçeklere yanıt olarak gelişmiştir. ABD'nin Kıbrıs'a askeri satışlara uyguladığı ambargonun kaldırılması, Rus varlığına karşı koymayı ve Amerikan çıkarlarını güçlendirmeyi amaçlayan stratejik bir manevra olarak analiz edilmektedir. Bu çabalara rağmen, kalıcı bir çözüme giden yol zorluklarla dolu olmaya devam etmektedir; zira Rum ve Türk Kıbrıslılar arasındaki köklü bölünmeler, karmaşık uluslararası çıkarlarla birleşerek ilerlemeyi engellemeye devam etmektedir. Bu makale, Kıbrıs sorununu kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alarak, adanın bugününü ve geleceğini şekillendiren tarihsel şikayetlerin, etnik bölünmelerin ve uluslararası diplomasinin etkileşimini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Safa, R. (2025). U.S. Relations With Cyprus: From NATO Protection to Status Quoist Perspective. EURO Politika, Sayı: 2, 25–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/1585763

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Adams, T. (1966). The First Republic of Cyprus: a Review of an Unworkable Constitution, The Western Political Quarterly, 19(3), 475. University of Utah Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591296601900303
  2. Aydemir, S. S. (2021). The first diplomatic crisis that caused harm to the image of the USA in the eyes of the Turkish public: The Johnson Letter. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences / Uluslararasi Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(45), 626.
  3. Brinkley, D. (1990). Dean Acheson and the ‘special relationship’: The West Point speech of December 1962. The Historical Journal, 33(3), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00013546
  4. Christou, M. (2006). A double imagination: Memory and education in Cyprus. Mediterranean Quarterly, 24(2), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2006.0019
  5. Dodd, C. (2010). The History and Politics of the Cyprus Conflict.
  6. Duckett, B. (2010). Historical Dictionary of Cyprus. In Reference Reviews (Vol. 24, Issue 7, p. 61). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/09504121011077516
  7. Fırat, M. M. (1997). 1960-71 arası Türk dış politikası ve Kıbrıs sorunu. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  8. Hannay, D. (2005). Cyprus: The search for a solution. I.B. Tauris.
  9. İsmail, S. (2000). Kıbrıs sorununun kökleri. İstanbul: Akdeniz Haber Ajansı Yayınları.
  10. Janigian, A. M. (2017). The Cypriot-Turkish conflict and NATO-European Union cooperation. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1046420.pdf
  11. Kalaitzaki, T. (2023). US Mediation in the Greek-Turkish Disputes since 1954. https://read.dukeupress.edu/mediterranean-quarterly/article-abstract/16/2/106/1532/US-Mediation-in-Greek-Turkish-Disputes-since-1954?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  12. Katsoulas, S. (2021). The “Nixon Letter” to Ecevit: An untold story of the eve of the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974. The International History Review, 44(2), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2021.1935293
  13. Katsourides, Y. (2017). The Greek Cypriot Nationalist Right in the Era of British Colonialism. In Contributions to political science. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55536-2
  14. Ker-Lindsay, J. (2009). A history of Cyprus Peace Proposals. In Reunifying Cyprus: The Annan plan and Beyond (p. 11). New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.
  15. Ker‐Lindsay, J. (2011). The Cyprus Problem. In Oxford University Press eBooks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780199757169.001.0001
  16. Kızılyürek, N. (2005). Doğmamış bir devletin tarihi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  17. Kontos, M. (2020). Cyprus and the great powers: An evaluation of Russian-Cypriot relations in the new Eastern Mediterranean environment. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 15(4), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2019-4-53-17-27
  18. Kürkçügil, M. (2003). Kıbrıs Dün ve Bugün, Ithaki Publishing House, Istanbul.
  19. Loizides, N. (2007). Ethnic Nationalism and Adaptation in Cyprus. In International Studies Perspectives (Vol. 8, Issue 2, p. 172). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00279.x
  20. Melakopides, C. (2020). Moscow-Cyprus relations since the 1950s: A schematic introduction. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 15(4), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2019-4-53-39-55
  21. Michael, M. S. (2009). Resolving the Cyprus Conflict. In Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230103382
  22. Neocleous, E. (2015). The potential impact of Russian de-offshorization legislation on Cyprus holding and finance structures. Trusts & Trustees, 21(6), 610-613. https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttv052
  23. Nicolet, C. (2002). The Development of US Plans for the Resolution of the Cyprus Conflict in 1964: “The Limits of American Power.” In Cold War History (Vol. 3, Issue 1, p. 95). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/713999969
  24. Papadakis, Y., Peristianis, N., & Welz, G. (2006). Divided Cyprus: Modernity, History, and an Island in Conflict.
  25. Price, N. (2022). Lifting of defense trade restrictions on the Republic of Cyprus for fiscal year 2023. https://www.state.gov/lifting-of-defense-trade-restrictions-on-the-republic-of-cyprus-for-fiscal-year-2023/
  26. Rappas, A. (2014). Cyprus in the 1930s: British colonial rule and the roots of the Cyprus conflict. London: I.B. Tauris. https://www.amazon.com/Cyprus-1930s-Colonial-International-Twentieth/dp/1780764383
  27. Sakellaropoulos, S. (2022). The evolution of the political, social and economic life of Cyprus, 1191-1950. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91839-2
  28. Souter, D. (1984). An island apart: A review of the Cyprus problem [Review of An island apart: A review of the Cyprus problem]. Third World Quarterly, 6(3), 657. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598408419791
  29. Stroescu, O.-C., & Popa, D. (2012). Ethnic Stereotyping in the Greek History Textbooks, 1974-1988. Main Aspects of the Educational Language Used for Depicting the Turks. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 46, p. 5124). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.394
  30. Ulusoy, K. (2016). Turkey and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus: A thorny relationship. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 40(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsa.2016.0017
  31. Vural, Y. (2011). Resolving the Cyprus conflict: negotiating history. In Global change, peace & security (Vol. 23, Issue 3, p. 445). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2011.605648
  32. Yakinthou, C. (2009). Political settlements in divided societies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246874
  33. Yeşilada, B. A. (2009). Islam and the Turkish Cypriots. In Social Compass (Vol. 56, Issue 1, p. 49). SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768608100341
  34. Τσουκαλά, Ό. (2021). Diplomatic Tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean: Developments in 2021 and Prospects. In HAPSc Policy Briefs Series (Vol. 2, Issue 2, p. 157). National Documentation Centre. https://doi.org/10.12681/hapscpbs.29503