SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

CAMELS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL DEPOSIT BANKS IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ MEVDUAT BANKALARININ CAMELS PERFORMANS ANALİZİ

ALİ USLU
MURAT TÜRK
FATİH COŞKUN ERTAŞ
Pages
122–139
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found that public banks formed the better performing bank group and that Akbank and Ziraat Bank had the best performance with positive and high CAMELS compound values during all periods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, aimed that analysis of the risk of public and private capital banks in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The performances of three public and eight private capital deposit banks between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed by CAMEL rating system.A results of the analysis; the value of CAMELS compound is increased by 33% of public banks and 75% of private banks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found that public banks formed the better performing bank group and that Akbank and Ziraat Bank had the best performance with positive and high CAMELS compound values during all periods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, aimed that analysis of the risk of public and private capital banks in Turkey. The performances of three public and eight private capital deposit banks between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed by CAMEL rating system.A results of the analysis; the value of CAMELS compound is increased by 33% of public banks and 75% of private banks. However, it was found that public banks formed the better performing bank group and that Akbank and Ziraat Bank had the best performance with positive and high CAMELS compound values during all periods.

Özet

Çalışmada, Türkiye’deki kamu ve özel sermayeli mevduat bankalarının risk analizinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Üç kamu ve sekiz özel sermayeli mevduat bankasının 2010-2017 yılları performansları CAMELS derecelendirme sistemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda CAMELS bileşik değerinin kamu bankalarının % 33’ünde ve özel sermayeli bankaların % 75’inde artığı tespit edilmiştir. Ancak kamu bankalarının daha iyi bir performans gösteren banka grubunu oluşturduğu ve Akbank ile Ziraat Bankası’nın tüm dönemler boyunca pozitif ve yüksek CAMELS bileşik değerleri ile en iyi performansa sahip olduğu sonucu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

USLU, A., TÜRK, M., ERTAŞ, F. C. (2019). CAMELS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL DEPOSIT BANKS IN TURKEY. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 122–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/158489

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abdullayev, M. (2013), “Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Dezenflasyon Sürecinde CAMELS Analizi”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı 37, 97-112.
  2. Ahsan, M. K. (2016), “Measuring Financial Performance Based on CAMEL: A Study on Selected Islami Banks in Bangladesh”, Asian Business Review Vol. 6, No., 1, 47-56.
  3. Altın, H., Süslü, C., Kutucuoğlu, S. (2016), “Türk Bankacılık Sektörünün Küresel Mali Kriz Ortamında Analizi: CAMELS Uygulaması” Eurasian Business and Economics Journal, Vol. S2, 457-475.
  4. Aytekin, S. ve Sakarya, Ş. (2013), “BİST’teki Mevduat Bankalarının Finansal Performanslarının 2001 ve 2008 Finansal Krizleri Çerçevesinde CAMELS Derecelendirme Sistemi ile Değerlendirilmesi”, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 13 Sayı 2, 13, 25-58.
  5. Bastan, M., Mazraeh, M. B., AHMADVAND, A.M. (2016), “Dynamics of Banking Soundness Based on Camels Rating System”, The 34th International Conference of the System Dynamis Society, 17-21 July 2016,
  6. Delft, Netherlands. BDDK (2018), BDDK tarafından bankalara ilişkin herhangi bir derecelendirme yapılmakta mıdır? https://www.bddk.org.tr/websitesi/ turkce/kurum _bilgileri/SSS/10482denetim3.pdf 24/06/2018
  7. Cole, R. A. ve Gunther, J.W. (1998), “Predicting Bank Failures: A Comparison of on-and off-Site Monitoring System”, Journal of Financial Services Research 13:2, 103-117.
  8. Christopoulos, A.G., Mylonakıs, J., Dıktapanıdıs, P. (2011), “Could Lehman Brothers Collapse Be Anticipated? An Examination Using CAMELS Rating System”, International Business Research, Vol. 4, No.2, 11-19.
  9. Çağıl, G., Mukhtarov, S. (2014), “Azerbaycan Ticari Bankacılık Sektörünün CAMELS Yöntemi ile Performans Analizi”, Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, Cilt 11, Sayı 41, 77-94.
  10. Çelik, M. (2018), “Türkiye’de Faaliyet Gösteren Mevduat Bankalarının Performans Analizi: Büyüklük ve Sahiplik Yapısı Ayrımıyla Bir Karşılaştırma”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Yıl 5, Cilt 5, 146-168.
  11. Çinko, M. ve Avcı, E. (2008), “CAMELS Derecelendirme Sistemi ve Türk Ticari Bankacılık Sektöründe Başarısızlık Tahmini”, BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt 2, Sayı, 2, 25-48. Derviz A., ve Podpiera, J. (2004) “Predicting Bank CAMELS and S&p Ratings: The Case of the Czech Republic”, Czech National Bank, Working Paper Series 1. Jaffar, M., Manarvi, I. (2011), “Performance Comparison of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Pakistan”, Global Journal of Management and Business Research, Volume 11, Issue 1 Version 1.0, February, 61-66.
  12. Kandemir, T.