SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

An Examination of Secondary School Students’ Mindsets in Terms of Gender, Grade Level and Age Variables within the Context of Implicit Theories

Örtük Teoriler Bağlamında Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Zihniyetlerinin Cinsiyet, Sınıf ve Yaş Değişkenleri Açısından İncelenmesi

Seda Görgöz(MUĞLA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5272-9499
Bilal Duman(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1282-8425
Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2026-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that there were no significant differences in students’ scale scores across the variables of gender, grade level, and age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to examine the growth and fixed mindsets of secondary school students within the framework of implicit theories, according to the variables of gender, grade level and age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research sample consisted of a total of 221 students enrolled in the 7th and 8th grades of a state secondary school affiliated with the Ministry of National Education (MEB) in the Marmaris district of Muğla province during the 2024–2025 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that there were no significant differences in students’ scale scores across the variables of gender, grade level, and age.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2024–2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gelişim zihniyeti · Sabit zihniyet · Cinsiyet

Abstract

This article aims to examine the growth and fixed mindsets of secondary school students within the framework of implicit theories, according to the variables of gender, grade level and age. A correlational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, was employed in the study. The research sample consisted of a total of 221 students enrolled in the 7th and 8th grades of a state secondary school affiliated with the Ministry of National Education (MEB) in the Marmaris district of Muğla province during the 2024–2025 academic year. To determine the students’ self-theories regarding intelligence, the researchers used a three-item “Personal Information Form” and the Mindset Scale (MS), which was developed by Dweck (1999, 2013) and revised and updated by De Castella and Byrne (2015). The adaptation, validity and reliability studies of the scale into Turkish were conducted by Orhan (2021). Data analysis involved frequency, percentage, independent samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results indicated that there were no significant differences in students’ scale scores across the variables of gender, grade level, and age. The findings suggest that the students possess a growth mindset.

Özet

Bu araştırma, ortaokul öğrencilerinin örtük teoriler çerçevesinde gelişim ve sabit zihniyetlerini cinsiyet, sınıf ve yaş değişkenlerine göre incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma örneklemi 2024-2025 eğitim-öğretim yılında Muğla ili Marmaris ilçesindeki MEB’e bağlı bir devlet ortaokulunun 7. ve 8. sınıflarında öğrenim gören toplam 221 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Öğrencilere araştırmacılarca hazırlanan üç soruluk “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” ile zekâya ilişkin öz-kuramlarını belirlemek amacıyla, temelleri Dweck (1999, 2013) tarafından geliştirilen ve De Castella ile Byrne (2015) tarafından revize edilerek güncellenen Düşünce Tarzı Ölçeği (DTÖ) kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları Orhan (2021) tarafından gerçekleştirilmiştir Verilerin analizinde frekans, yüzde, bağımsız örneklemler t-testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre öğrencilerin ölçek puanlarının cinsiyet, sınıf ve yaş değişkenleri açısından anlamlı fark göstermediği belirlenmiştir. Bulgulara göre, öğrencilerin gelişime açık zihniyet yapısına sahip oldukları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Görgöz, S., Duman, B. (2026). An Examination of Secondary School Students’ Mindsets in Terms of Gender, Grade Level and Age Variables within the Context of Implicit Theories. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.38089/ekuad.2026.252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287–309.
  2. Arthofer, L. (2016). Growth Mindset lessons and the effects on middle school students' attitudes and effort in mathematics. Touro Scholar. https://touroscholar.touro.edu/tucgsoe/227/
  3. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
  4. Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113
  5. Claro, S., & Loeb, S. (2019). Students with a growth mindset learn more in school: Evidence from California. Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis.
  6. Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th Edition, Sage.
  7. De Castella, K., & Byrne, D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245–267.
  8. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
  9. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
  10. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
  11. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1993). Development during early and middle adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.
  12. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
  14. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour, Vol. 2, pp. 53–92. The Guilford Press.
  15. Gonida, E. N., Kiosseoglou, G., & Leondari, A. (2006). Implicit theories of intelligence, perceived academic competence, and school achievement: Testing alternative models. American Journal of Psychology, 119(2), 223–238.
  16. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardised test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
  17. Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526–1541.
  18. Gunderson, E. A., Hamdan, N., Sorhagen, N. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related maths attitudes. Sex Roles, 77(3-4), 211–223.
  19. Karasar, N. (2017). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
  20. Kuiper, N. A. (2012). Humour and resilience: Towards a process model of coping and growth. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(3).
  21. Orhan, S.İ. (2021). An investigation of the effect of instruction designed according to the developmental self-theory on Year 7 pupils’ learning of the ‘cells and division’ unit, their motivation and self-confidence. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Kastamonu University.
  22. Padesky, C. A., & Mooney, K. A. (2012). Strengths-based cognitive–behavioural therapy: A four-step model to build resilience. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(4), 283–290.
  23. Pomerantz, E. M., & Saxon, J. L. (2001). Conveying performance feedback to children: Is more always better? Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 174–185.
  24. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioural functioning in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 408–422.
  25. Trigueros, R., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Alvarez, J. F., & Cangas, A. J. (2019). Adaptation and validation of the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) in physical education classes and analysis of its role as a mediator between teacher and anxiety. Sustainability, 11(18), 5081.
  26. Schlender, J., Tan, K., & Wegmann, K. (2020). Gender differences in growth mindset, group identity, and social skills. Journal of Undergraduate Social Work Research, 4(2).
  27. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231.
  28. Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3- 4.591
  29. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170010
  30. West, M. R., Gabrieli, C. F., Finn, A. S., Kraft, M. A., & Scherer, E. (2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 148–170.
  31. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 933–1002). Wiley.
  32. Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
  33. Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D. Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., Hahn, P. R., Dweck, C. S. et al. (2019). A National Experiment Reveals Where a Growth Mindset Improves Achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y