SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dilbilim / 2026 / Sayı: 42

A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Emotion Words in Turkish

Türkçedeki Duygu Sözcüklerinin Psikodilbilimsel Açıdan İncelenmesi

Filiz Mergen(İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi, Meslek Yüksekokulu, Uygulamalı İngilizce Çevirmenlik Programı)0000-0002-9583-9153
Journal
Dilbilim
Pages
35–53
Publication Date
2024-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings were discussed with regard to psycholinguistic principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Emotion words, which are verbal expressions of emotions, have long been the subject of psycholinguistic studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Native speakers of Turkish (N=39) were asked to distinguish these two types of words from letter strings which are potentially legitimate words, but lack conceptual associations (non-words).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings were discussed with regard to psycholinguistic principles.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Duygu sözcükleri · duygu yüklü sözcükler · sözcüksel işlemleme

Abstract

Emotion words, which are verbal expressions of emotions, have long been the subject of psycholinguistic studies. It was revealed that emotion words are different from neutral words and need to be classified accordingly, even within themselves. To put differently, it has been accepted that there are differences between emotion words that directly refer to emotions and emotion-laden words that are associated with emotions. In this study, it is aimed to reveal if Turkish emotion words differ based on this criterion. Native speakers of Turkish (N=39) were asked to distinguish these two types of words from letter strings which are potentially legitimate words, but lack conceptual associations (non-words). They were asked to decide whether the stimuli presented on a computer screen were real words or not. Their reaction times and accuracy of responses were recorded. The results revealed that there was a temporal difference between the words in both categories. While emotion words were processed faster than emotion-laden words. In addition, it was shown that all words that indicate or elicit positive emotions, regardless of the type of word, were processed faster than negative words. The same result was also obtained in distinguishing real words from non-words. These findings were discussed with regard to psycholinguistic principles.

Özet

Psikodilbilim alanında, duyguların dil ile ifade edilmesini sağlayan duygu sözcükleri uzun süredir birçok çalışmanın konusu olmuştur. Duygulara işaret eden sözcüklerinin zihinsel işleyişini ele alan çalışmalarda bu tür sözcüklerin diğer sözcüklerden farklı olduğu, hatta kendi içlerinde bile sınıflandırılması gerekliliği ortaya çıkmıştır. Buna göre, doğrudan duygulara işaret eden duygu sözcükleri ile, duyguları çağrıştıran duygu yüklü sözcüklerin arasında farklılıkların olduğu kabul edilmiştir. Bu farklılıkların Türkçede nasıl olduğunu hedefleyen bu çalışmada, ana dili Türkçe olan bireylerden bu iki tür sözcüğünü anlamı olmayan harf dizilerinden ayırt etmeleri istenmiştir. Bilgisayar ekranından sunulan bu uyaranların gerçek sözcük olup olmadığına karar vermeleri istenmiş ve bu görev esnasında tepki süreleri ve cevaplarının doğruluğu kaydedilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, her iki kategoride bulunan sözcüklerin arasında zamansal olarak farklılık olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Duygu sözcükleri daha önce farkedilirken, duygu yüklü sözcüklerin daha uzun sürede işlemlendiği görülmüştür. Ayrıca, sözcük türüne bağlı olmaksızın olumlu duyguları uyandıran ya da işaret eden tüm sözcüklerin olumsuz yüklü sözcüklerden daha hızlı işlemlendiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Aynı bulgu, gerçek sözcüklerin anlamsız harf dizilerinden ayırt edilmesinde de görülmüştür. Bu bulgular psikodilbilimsel prensipler çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mergen, F. (2024). A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Emotion Words in Turkish. Dilbilim, Sayı: 42, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2024.1585175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Altarriba, J. (2006). Cognitive approaches to the study of emotion-laden and emotion words in monolingual and bilingual memory. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 56, 232-256. google scholar
  2. Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context-availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 578-602. google scholar
  3. Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389-410. google scholar
  4. Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2011). The representation of emotion vs. emotion-laden words in English and Spanish in the Affective Simon Task. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(3), 310 -328. google scholar
  5. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J. & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: the journey from features to meaning (a travel update). Traxler, M. J. ve Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Academic Press: A.B.D. google scholar
  6. Barber, H. A. & Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 98-123. google scholar
  7. Basnight-Brown, D.M. & Altarriba, J. (2018). The Influence of Emotion and Culture on Language Representation and Processing. Advances in Culturally-Aware Intelligent Systems and in Cross-Cultural Psychological Studies içinde. C. Faucher (ed.) (ss. 415-432). Springer International Publishing: A.B.D. google scholar
  8. Bleasdale, F. A. (1987). Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 582-594. google scholar
  9. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204-256. google scholar
  10. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3-49), 169-200. google scholar
  11. Estes, Z. & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer ve Balota. Emotion, 8(4), 441-444. google scholar
  12. Göçen, G., Şen, B. & Duman FD. (2020). Yabancılar için Türkçe okuma kitaplarındaki isim soylu kelimelerin kullanm sıklığı. Türük Uluslararası Dil, Edebiyat ve Halkbilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21, 46-73. google scholar
  13. Göz, İ. (2019). Yazılı Türkçenin Kelime Sıklığı Sözlüğü. Türk Dil Kurumu: Ankara. google scholar
  14. Jackson J.C., Watts J., Henry T.R., List J.M., Forkel R., Mucha P.J., Greenhill S.J., Gray R.D. & Lindquist K.A. (2019). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, 366 (6472), 1517-1522. google scholar
  15. Jared, D., Poh, R. P. Y. & Paivio, A. (2013). L1 and L2 picture-naming in Mandarin-English bilinguals: A test of bilingual dual coding theory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 383-396. google scholar
  16. Kang H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professionals, 8(17), 1-12. google scholar
  17. Kazanas, S.A. & Altarriba, J. (2015). The Automatic Activation of Emotion and Emotion-Laden Words: Evidence from a Masked and Unmasked Priming Paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(3), 323-336 google scholar
  18. Kazanas, S., & Altarriba, J. (2016). Emotion word type and affective valence priming at a long stimulus onset asynchrony. Language and Speech, 59(3), 339-352. google scholar
  19. Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P. & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473-481. google scholar
  20. Kissler, J. & Koessler, S. (2011). Emotionally positive stimuli facilitate lexical decisions - an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 86(3), 254-264. google scholar
  21. Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, G., Vo, M. L., Conrad, M. & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 28(4), 1022-1032. google scholar
  22. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion Circuits in the Brain. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184. google scholar
  23. Liu, J., Fan, L., Jiang, J., Li, C., Tian, L., Zhang, X., & Feng, W. (2022a) Evidence for dynamic attentional bias toward positive emotion-laden words: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 966774. google scholar
  24. Liu, J., Fan, L., Tian, L., Li, C. & Feng, W. (2022b). The neural mechanisms of explicit and implicit processing of Chinese emotion-label and emotion-laden words: evidence from emotional categorisation and emotional Stroop tasks, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 38(10), 1412-1429. google scholar
  25. Mergen, F. (2023). Dil-Duygu-Beyin Bileşkesinde İkidillilik. Akademisyen Yayınevi: Ankara. google scholar
  26. Mergen, F. & Kuruoğlu, G. (2019). Brain bases of non-word processing in bilinguals. Psycholinguistics in a Modern World - 2019. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi. google scholar
  27. Mergen, F. & Kuruoğlu, G. (2020). Lateralization of non-word processing in monolinguals. Psycholinguistics in a Modern World - 2020. Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi. google scholar
  28. Nemrodov, D., Yuval, H., Javitt, D. C. & Lacidor, M. (2011). ERP evidence of interhemispheric independence in visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 118(3), 72-80. google scholar
  29. Palazova, M., Mantwill, K., Sommer, W. & Schacht, A. (2011). Are emotion effects in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2766-2775. google scholar
  30. Pavlenko, A. (2008). Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 147-164. google scholar
  31. Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 538-550 google scholar
  32. Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Visual word recognition: An overview. J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Ed.) içinde, Speech, language, and communication (pp. 137-179). Academic Press. google scholar
  33. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization- minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67-85. google scholar
  34. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063. google scholar
  35. Wu, C., Zhang, J., & Yuan, Z. (2021a). Can Masked Emotion-Laden Words Prime Emotion-Label Words? An ERP Test on the Mediated Account. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 721783: 1-7. google scholar
  36. Wu, C., Zhang, J., & Yuan, Z. (2021b). Exploring Affective Priming Effect of Emotion-Label Words and Emotion-Laden Words: An Event-Related Potential Study. Brain Sciences, 11(5), 553, 1-15 google scholar
  37. Zhang, J., Wu, C., Meng, Y., & Yuan, Z. (2017). Different Neural Correlates of Emotion-Label Words and Emotion-Laden Words: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 11(589), 1-9. google scholar