SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dilbilim / 2026 / Sayı: 46

Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness and Their Effects on the Opposing Nativist and Behaviorist Theories of Language from Rationalist and Empiricist Viewpoints

Berkay Bulgurlu(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6082-6363
Journal
Dilbilim
Pages
83–93
Publication Date
2026-05-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Drawing exclusively on established philosophical and linguistic sources, the study offers a theoretical–historical synthesis that highlights how implicit assumptions about consciousness and mind continue to shape contemporary approaches to language learning, teaching, and assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines seventeenth-century theories of consciousness and their enduring influence on opposing nativist and behaviorist theories of language from rationalist and empiricist perspectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Focusing primarily on Cartesian accounts of consciousness, thought, and linguistic creativity, the study traces how rationalist notions of innate mental capacities informed later developments in Port-Royal Logic and, subsequently, Noam Chomsky’s theory of generative grammar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Drawing exclusively on established philosophical and linguistic sources, the study offers a theoretical–historical synthesis that highlights how implicit assumptions about consciousness and mind continue to shape contemporary approaches to language learning, teaching, and assessment.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Consciousness · Language acquisition · Applied linguistics

Abstract

This article examines seventeenth-century theories of consciousness and their enduring influence on opposing nativist and behaviorist theories of language from rationalist and empiricist perspectives. Focusing primarily on Cartesian accounts of consciousness, thought, and linguistic creativity, the study traces how rationalist notions of innate mental capacities informed later developments in Port-Royal Logic and, subsequently, Noam Chomsky’s theory of generative grammar. In contrast, it also explores empiricist approaches to mind and knowledge, particularly those associated with Locke and later behaviorist theorists, which conceptualize language acquisition as a product of experience, habit formation, and environmental conditioning. By systematically comparing these philosophical traditions, the article clarifies the epistemological foundations underlying long-standing debates in language acquisition, pedagogy, and applied linguistics. Drawing exclusively on established philosophical and linguistic sources, the study offers a theoretical–historical synthesis that highlights how implicit assumptions about consciousness and mind continue to shape contemporary approaches to language learning, teaching, and assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bulgurlu, B. (2026). Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness and Their Effects on the Opposing Nativist and Behaviorist Theories of Language from Rationalist and Empiricist Viewpoints. Dilbilim, Sayı: 46, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2026.1895275

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Arnauld, A. (1990). On true and false ideas (S. Gaukroger, Trans.). Manchester University Press. google scholar
  2. Arnauld, A., & Lancelot, C. (1975). General and rational grammar: The Port-Royal grammar (J. Rieux & B. E. Rollin, Trans.). Mouton. google scholar
  3. Arnauld, A., & Nicole, P. (1996). Logic or the art of thinking (J. V. Buroker, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  4. Behme, C. (2011). Cartesian linguistics: From historical antecedents to computational modeling. Dalhousie University. google scholar
  5. Buroker, J. (2017). Port-Royal logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). google scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. Harper & Row. google scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. Pantheon Books. google scholar
  8. Demirezen, M. (1988). Behaviorist theory and language learning. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 135–140. google scholar
  9. Descartes, R. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 3, J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, & A. Kenny, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  10. Descartes, R. (1996). Oeuvres de Descartes (C. Adam & P. Tannery, Eds.; 11 vols.). J. Vrin. google scholar
  11. Evans, V. (2014). The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  12. Garnham, A., Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (2006). Observations on the past and future of psycholinguistics. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Elsevier. google scholar
  13. Hammond, T. (2025). Unified pedagogical linguistics: Bridging generative and usage-based SLA in language teaching. Pedagogical Linguistics. google scholar
  14. Harris, M. (1992). Language experience and early language development: From input to uptake. Psychology Press. google scholar
  15. Herbert of Cherbury. (1937). On truth (M. H. Carré, Trans.). University of Bristol Studies No. 6. (Original work published 1624 as De Veritate) google scholar
  16. Hubbard, P., Jones, H., Thornton, B., & Wheeler, R. (1983). A training course for TEFL. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  17. Hulstijn, J. (2024). Predictions of individual differences in the acquisition of native and non-native languages: An update of BLC theory. Languages, 9(5), 173. google scholar
  18. Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249. google scholar
  19. Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. John Benjamins. google scholar
  20. Jorgensen, L. M. (2020). Seventeenth-century theories of consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.). google scholar
  21. Karakaş, A. (2020). An analysis of rationalism in English language teaching. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 2(1), 49–62. google scholar
  22. Leibniz, G. W. (1996). New essays on human understanding (P. Remnant & J. Bennett, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  23. Locke, J. (1997). An essay concerning human understanding (R. Woolhouse, Ed.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1690) google scholar
  24. Markie, P. (2017). Rationalism vs. empiricism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.). google scholar
  25. Ortega, L., & Wu, S.-L. (2025). Rethinking language proficiency: Commentary on Hulstijn (2024). Languages, 10(4), 58. google scholar
  26. Reutzel, D. R., & Cooter, R. B. (2004). Teaching children to read: Putting the pieces together (4th ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall. google scholar
  27. Ricken, U. (1984). Linguistics, anthropology and philosophy in the French Enlightenment: Language theory and ideology(R. E. Norton, Trans.). Routledge. google scholar
  28. Rivers, M. W. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago University Press. google scholar
  29. Rowland, C. F., Westermann, G., Theakston, A. L., Pine, J. M., Monaghan, P., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2026). Constructing language: A framework for explaining acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 30(1), 26–39. google scholar
  30. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Prentice-Hall. google scholar
  31. Thomas, M. (2004). Universal grammar in second language acquisition: A history. Routledge. google scholar
  32. Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., & Rothman, J. (2025). Dichotomies as points of departure: A response to Truscott and Sharwood Smith (2024). Second Language Research. google scholar