Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Mentoring: An ancient training and career development method

Üstatlık: Kadim bir eğitim ve kariyer geliştirme yöntemi

Pages
103–132
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, protege, mentor and mentoring concepts are briefly explained, and theoretically scrutinized with its various dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mentoring being researched since the 1950s is a method of mutual learning between the master and the apprentice for the goal of career development and training of inexperienced employees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a development process, mentoring can be practiced in \various types such as individual or group mentoring and formal or informal mentoring. •The great deal of research on mentoring has shown that conscious application of mentoring in an organization as a part of human resources management policy creates significant benefits for the organization, mentor and proteges.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, protege, mentor and mentoring concepts are briefly explained, and theoretically scrutinized with its various dimensions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mentoring being researched since the 1950s is a method of mutual learning between the master and the apprentice for the goal of career development and training of inexperienced employees. As a development process, mentoring can be practiced in \various types such as individual or group mentoring and formal or informal mentoring. •The great deal of research on mentoring has shown that conscious application of mentoring in an organization as a part of human resources management policy creates significant benefits for the organization, mentor and proteges. This study aims to analyze mentoring practices based on an extensive literature review, and historical applications. In this context, protege, mentor and mentoring concepts are briefly explained, and theoretically scrutinized with its various dimensions.

Özet

1950'li yıllardan bu yana, hem araştırmacılar hem de uygulayıcılar tarafından inceleme konusu olan üstatlık, tecrübesiz işgörenlerin eğitimi ve kariyer gelişimini hedefleyen usta-çırak ilişkisine dayalı karşılıklı öğrenme yöntemidir. Gelişim süreci açısından incelendiğinde, üstatlığın bireysel veya grup, resmi veya gayri-resmi olarak farklı şekillerde uygulandığı görülmektedir. Bu konuda yapılan araştırmalar, bir takım sıkıntıların ortaya çıkabildiğini göstermekle birlikte, üstatlığın organizasyonlar tarafından insan kaynakları yönetimi politikasının bir parçası olarak bilinçli bir şekilde uygulanması durumunda hem üstat, hem çömez hem de organizasyona yararlar sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilgili literatür taranarak üstatlık uygulamasını, yapılan araştırma bulguları ile güncel ve tarihi uygulamalar çerçevesinde incelemektir. Bu bağlamda, çömez, üstat ve üstatlık kavramları kısaca açıklandıktan sonra, konu teorik çerçevede farklı boyutları ile ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAYOĞLU, N. (2012). Mentoring: An ancient training and career development method. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 103–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/158224

References (17)

  1. Abney, Robertha (1991), "Recruiting and Mentoring Sports Leaders", Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, Vol. 62, No: 3, p. 48-50,
  2. March. Abraham, Yohannen T. - Flippo, Edwin B. (1991),
  3. Managing A Changing Workforce, Cammerde Clearing House, Inc., Chicago. Appelbaum, Steven H. (1994), "Mentoring Revisited: An Organizational Behavior Construct", The International Journal of Career Management, Vol. 6, p. 3-10.
  4. Appelbaum, Steven H. - Ritchie, Stephen - Shapiro, Barbara T. (1994), "Mentoring Revisited: An Organizational Behaviour Construct," Journal of Management Development, Vol. 13, No: 4, p. 62-72.
  5. Bartol, Kathryn M. - Martin, David C. (1991),
  6. Management, McGraw- Hill Inc., New York. Barutçugil, İsmet (2004),
  7. Stratejik İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Kariyer Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  8. Baugh, S. Gayle - Sullivan, Sherry E. (2005), "Mentoring and Career Development", Career Development International, Vol. 10, N: 6/7, p. 425-428.
  9. Bittel, Lester R. - Newstrom, John W. (1990),
  10. What Every Supervisor Should Know, Mcgraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore. Booth, Rosemary (1996), "Mentor or Manager. What is the difference? A Case Study in Supervisory Mentoring", Leadership&Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17, No: 3, p. 31-36.
  11. Budak, Gönül (2008), Yetkinliğe Dayalı İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Barış Yayınları -Fakülteler Kitabevi, İzmir. * Burke, Ronald J. - McKeen, Carol A. (1989), "Developing Formel Mentoring Programs in Organizations", Business Quarterly, Vol. 53, No: 3, p. 76-79,
  12. Winter. Burke, Ronald J. - McKeen, Carol A. - McKenna, Catherine (1994), "Benefits of Mentoring in Organizations: The Mentor's Perspective", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 9, No: 3, p. 23-32.
  13. Case, J. - Witemeyer, H. (2006), "Intergenerational Coaching and Mentoring: One Size Doesn't Fit All", Hewlett - Packard Development Company, USA. CLC - Corporate Leadership Council (1999), "Mentoring-A Theoretical Perspective", October, p. 1-10.
  14. Demir, Galip (2001), "Ahilik ve Yükselen Değerler", Görüş Dergisi, İstanbul, s.76- 82; http://www.ahilik.net/images/stories/makaleler/ahilik.pdf,Ocak, (21.07.2010)
  15. Ehrich, Lisa C. - Hansford, Bian (1999), "Mentoring: Pros and Cons for HRM", Asia Pasific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 37, No: 3, p. 92-107.
  16. Eklin, Jono (2006), "A Review of Mentoring Relationships: Formation, Function, Benefits, and Dysfunction", Otago Management Graduate Review, Vol. 4, p. 11-23.
  17. Friday, Earnest - Friday, Shawnta S. (2002), "Formel Mentoring: Is There a strategic fit?",