Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 640

Determination of the Firm Specific Factors Affecting Capital Structure Using Panel Data Analysis: An Application upon the Corporate Governance Index

Sermaye Yapısına Etki Eden Firmaya Özgü Faktörlerin Panel Veri Analizleri ile Belirlenmesi: Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Pages
63–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, no statistically significant relationship was found between non-debt tax shield, growth opportunity, operating leverage ratio and Tobin’s q and the financial leverage ratio.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it is aimed to determine the firm characteristic factors that affect the capital structure of firms operating in the Corporate Governance Index between 2007-2015 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of the analysis, a statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between liquidity ratio, asset tangibility and return on assets and the financial leverage ratio while a statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between firm size and the financial leverage ratio.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, no statistically significant relationship was found between non-debt tax shield, growth opportunity, operating leverage ratio and Tobin’s q and the financial leverage ratio.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the study, it is aimed to determine the firm characteristic factors that affect the capital structure of firms operating in the Corporate Governance Index between 2007-2015 period. Capital structure is represented by the financial leverage ratio while the firm specific factors are represented by the return on assets, firm size, liquidity ratio, non-debt tax shield, Tobin’s q, growth opportunity, asset tangibility and operating leverage ratio. Panel data analysis were used to determine the factors affecting capital structure. At the end of the analysis, a statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between liquidity ratio, asset tangibility and return on assets and the financial leverage ratio while a statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between firm size and the financial leverage ratio. On the other hand, no statistically significant relationship was found between non-debt tax shield, growth opportunity, operating leverage ratio and Tobin’s q and the financial leverage ratio.

Özet

Çalışmada, Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksi’nde 2007-2015 döneminde faaliyet gösteren firmaların sermaye yapılarına etki eden firmaya özgü faktörlerin belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Sermaye yapısı, finansal kaldıraç oranı ile temsil edilirken, firmaya özgü faktörler ise aktif karlılık oranı, firma büyüklüğü, likidite oranı, borç dışı vergi kalkanı, Tobin’s q, büyüme fırsatı, varlık yapısı ve faaliyet kaldıracı oranı ile temsil edilmiştir. Sermaye yapısına etki eden faktörlerin tespit edilmesinde panel veri analiz yöntemlerinden faydalanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda, likidite oranı, varlık yapısı ve aktif karlılık oranı ile finansal kaldıraç arasında anlamlı ve negatif yönlü ilişki belirlenirken, firma büyüklüğü ile pozitif yönlü ilişki belirlenmiştir. Diğer taraftan borç dışı vergi kalkanı, büyüme fırsatı, faaliyet kaldıracı ve Tobin’s q ile finansal kaldıraç arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPALOĞLU, E. E. (2018). Determination of the Firm Specific Factors Affecting Capital Structure Using Panel Data Analysis: An Application upon the Corporate Governance Index. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 640, 63–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/158001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ABDİOĞLU, N. ve DENİZ, D.; (2015), “Borsa İstanbul’da İşlem Gören İmalat Sanayi Şirketlerinin Sermaye Yapılarının Firmaya Özgü Belirleyicileri”, Sosyoekonomi, 23 (26), ss. 195-213.
  2. AKRAM, M.; (2011), “Do Crude Oil Price Changes Affect Economic Growth of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh?”, Economics D-Level Thesis, Högskolan Dalarna: Dalarna University School of Technology and Business Studies. ANTONIOU, A., GÜNEY, Y. ve PAUDYAL, K.; (2008), “The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market-Oriented versus Bank-Oriented Institutions”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (1), pp. 59-92.
  3. ARKUN, F.; (2011), “Yeni TTK ve Kurumsal Yönetim Alanında Getirdikleri”, Kurumsal Yönetim Dergisi, 12 (34). ARSOV, S. ve NAUMOSKI, A.; (2016), “Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study Of Companies From Selected Post-Transition Economies”, Zb. rad. Ekon. fak. Rij, 34 (1), pp. 119-146.
  4. ATA, A. ve AĞ, Y.; (2010), “Firma Karakteristiğinin Sermaye Yapısı Üzerindeki Etkisinin Analizi”, Ekonometri ve İstatistik, (11), ss. 45–60.
  5. BAI, J. ve NG, S.; (2004), “A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration”, 72 (4), pp. 1127–1177.
  6. BIÖRCK, J. ve LAGERCRANTZ, A.; (2011), “The Determinants of Capital Structure An Empirical Study of Differences Between Swedish SMEs and Large Firms”, Stockholm School of Economıcs Bachelor Thesis in Finance, Spring, pp. 1-29. BORSA İSTANBUL (Erişim Tarihi: 29.11.2016). www.borsaistanbul.com, http://www.borsaistanbul.com/veriler/verileralt/mali-tablolar-arsiv
  7. BREITUNG, J.; (2005), “A Parametric approach to the Estimation of Cointegration Vectors in Panel Data”, Econometric Reviews, 24 (2), pp. 151-173.
  8. BREUER, J. B., MCNOWN, R. ve WALLACE, M. S.; (2002), “Series-Specific Unit Root Tests With Panel Data”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64, pp. 527-546.
  9. BREUSCH, T. S. ve PAGAN, A. R.; (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, 47 (1), pp. 239-253.
  10. BUFERNA, F., BANGASSA, K. ve HODGKINSON, L.; (2005), “Determinants of Capital Structure Evidence from Libya”, Research Paper Series, Management School University of Liverpool. CALABRESE, T. T.; (2011), “Testing Competing Capital Structure Theories of Nonprofit Organizations”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 31 (3), pp. 119-143.
  11. CHEN, J. J.; (2004), “Determinants of Capital Structure of Chinese-Listed Companies”, Journal of Business Research. 57, pp. 1341-1351.
  12. CHOI, I.; (2001), “Unit Root Tests