Journals / Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

BIBLIOMETRIC AND DESCRIPTIVE CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES ON ONLINE HARASSMENT OF JOURNALISTS

GAZETECİLERİN ÇEVRİM İÇİ TACİZİNE İLİŞKİN MAKALELERİN BİBLİYOMETRİK VE BETİMSEL İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Şirin Karal Temüroğlu(TOKAT GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8114-6866
Pages
192–225
Publication Date
2026-01-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it was found that the articles were predominantly based on the experiences and perceptions of journalists working in different countries on online harassment, and that the issue of gender-based online harassment occupies an important place in this field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increase in journalists' online interactions has made it easier for them to become targets of online harassment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, the Web of Science (WoS) database was searched using the keywords journalist and online harassment, and 83 articles were found due to the examining conducted by predetermined criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it was found that the articles were predominantly based on the experiences and perceptions of journalists working in different countries on online harassment, and that the issue of gender-based online harassment occupies an important place in this field.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevrim içi Taciz · Çevrim içi İstismar · Siber Taciz

Abstract

The increase in journalists' online interactions has made it easier for them to become targets of online harassment. This situation, which has become a global problem, causes many researchers from different parts of the world to conduct research on the issue from different perspectives. The aim of this study is to identify the trends of academic articles in the international literature on online harassment against journalists and to evaluate how the issue is addressed in these studies. To this end, the Web of Science (WoS) database was searched using the keywords journalist and online harassment, and 83 articles were found due to the examining conducted by predetermined criteria. Two different analysis methods were used in this study. Bibliometric analysis was used to analyze the development of publications on online harassment of journalists, and content analysis was used to determine the perspectives and research methodologies of the researchers. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the articles were predominantly based on the experiences and perceptions of journalists working in different countries on online harassment, and that the issue of gender-based online harassment occupies an important place in this field.

Özet

Gazetecilerin çevrim içi etkileşimlerinin artması, çevrim içi tacizin hedefi olmalarını kolaylaştırmıştır. Küresel bir problem haline gelen bu durum, dünyanın farklı bölgelerinden birçok araştırmacının konuyu farklı açılardan ele alan araştırmalar gerçekleştirmelerine neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, uluslararası literatürde yer alan ve gazetecilere yönelik çevrim içi tacizi konu edinen akademik makalelerin eğilimlerini belirlemek ve bu çalışmalarda konunun ne şekilde ele alındığını değerlendirmektir. Bu doğrultuda Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında gazeteci ve çevrim içi taciz anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak tarama yapılmış ve önceden belirlenmiş kriterlere uygun olarak gerçekleştirilen eleme sonucunda 83 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmada iki farklı analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bibliyometrik analiz aracılığıyla gazetecilere yönelik çevrim içi tacizi ele alan yayınların gelişimi analiz edilmiş, içerik analiziyle araştırmacıların konuya hangi açılardan, ne şekilde yaklaştıkları ve araştırma metodolojileri belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda makalelerin ağırlıklı olarak farklı ülkelerde çalışan gazetecilerin çevrim içi taciz deneyimlerine ve algılarına dayandığı, özellikle cinsiyete dayalı çevrim içi taciz konusunun bu alanda önemli bir yer kapladığı bulgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Temüroğlu, Ş. K. (2026). BIBLIOMETRIC AND DESCRIPTIVE CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES ON ONLINE HARASSMENT OF JOURNALISTS. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 192–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/1577738

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Abhishek, A. (2023). The state deputizing citizens to discipline digital news media: The case of the IT rules 2021 in India. Digital Journalism, 11(10), 1769-1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134163
  2. Adams, C. (2018). “They go for gender first”: The nature and effect of sexist abuse of female technology journalists. Journalism Practice, 12(7), 850-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1350115
  3. Ash, T. G. (2016). Free speech: Ten principles for a connected world. Yale University Press.
  4. Binns, A. (2017). Fair game? Journalists’ experiences of online abuse. The Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 6(2), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.6.2.183_1
  5. Chen, G. M., Pain, P., Chen, V. Y., Mekelburg, M., Springer, N., & Troger, F. (2020). ‘You really have to have a thick skin’: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists. Journalism, 21(7), 877-895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500
  6. Defining “online abuse”: A glossary of terms. (2018, Nisan 11). Online Harassment Field Manual. https://onlineharassmentfieldmanual.pen.org/defining-online-harassment-a-glossary-of-terms/
  7. Demir, Y., & Ayhan, B. (2022). Being a female sports journalist on Twitter: Online harassment, sexualization, and hegemony. International Journal of Sport Communication, 15(3), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2022-0044
  8. Demir, Y., & Öztürk, M. (2023). Tarihsel süreçte “çevrimiçi taciz”: Bibliyometrik bir analiz. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(2), 939-953. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1265610
  9. Demir, Z. (2025). Çevrim içi kadın düşmanlığı konulu makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 13(2), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.1680749
  10. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  11. Gardiner, B. (2018). “It’s a terrible way to go to work:” What 70 million readers’ comments on the Guardian revealed about hostility to women and minorities online. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 592-608.
  12. Gottfried, J., Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., & Liedke, J. (2022). Journalists sense turmoil in their industry amid continued passion for their work. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2022/06/14/many-journalists-say-social-media-helps-at-work-but-most-decry-its-impact-on-journalism/
  13. Hart, K., & Sharma, N. (2024). “People don’t like journalists, especially women!”: Comparing the online and offline harassment faced by local journalists. Journalism Practice, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2441279
  14. Holton, A. E., Bélair-Gagnon, V., Bossio, D., & Molyneux, L. (2023). “Not their fault, but their problem”: Organizational responses to the online harassment of journalists. Journalism Practice, 17(4), 859-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1946417
  15. Im, J., Schoenebeck, S., Iriarte, M., Grill, G., Wilkinson, D., Batool, A., Alharbi, R., Funwie, A., Gankhuu, T., Gilbert, E., &
  16. Naseem, M. (2022). Women’s perspectives on harm and justice after online harassment. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 355:1-355:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555775
  17. Ivask, S. (2025). “It is easier to leave death threats than to get them taken down!” – systematising journalists’ battles with online mobs. Digital Journalism, 13(5), 1009-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2475181
  18. Jane, E. A. (2014). ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum, 28(4), 558-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.924479
  19. Koirala, S. (2020). Female journalists’ experience of online harassment: A case study of Nepal. Media and Communication, 8(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i1.2541
  20. Lenhart, A., Ybarra, M., Zickuhr, K., & Price-Feeney, M. (2016). Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. Data & Society Research Institute. https://www.datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Online_Harassment_2016.pdf
  21. Levey, T. G. (2018). Sexual harassment online: Shaming and silencing women in the digital age. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
  22. Lewis, S. C., & Molyneux, L. (2018). A decade of research on social media and journalism: Assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and Communication, 6(4), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562
  23. Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Coddington, M. (2020). Online harassment and Its implications for the journalist–audience relationship. Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1047-1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1811743
  24. Li, M., Hussain, S., Barkat, S., & Bostan, H. (2023). Online harassment and trolling of political journalists in Pakistan. Journalism Practice, 19(7), 1499-1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2259381
  25. Malcorps, S., Libert, M., & Le Cam, F. (2023). A Matter of organisational silence: Media managers struggling to make sense of the online harassment of journalists as a collective issue in journalism. Digital Journalism, 11(10), 1868-1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2140301
  26. Miller, K. C., & Lewis, S. C. (2022). Journalists, harassment, and emotional labor: The case of women in on-air roles at US local television stations. Journalism, 23(1), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919899016 O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families.
  27. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054
  28. Poland, B. (2016). Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. University of Nebraska Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1fq9wdp
  29. Posetti, J., Shabbir, N., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., & Aboulez, N. (2021). The chilling: Global trends in online violence against women journalists [Research Discussion Paper]. UNESCO. https://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/The%20Chilling_POSETTI%20ET%20AL_FINAL.pdf
  30. Riives, A., Murumaa-Mengel, M., & Ivask, S. (2021). Estonian male journalists’ experiences with abusive online communication. Sociální Studia / Social Studies, 18(2), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2021-2-31
  31. Sammut, F., Bezzina, M., & Scerri, J. (2023). Under attack in the cyber battlefield: A scoping review of journalists’ experiences of cyberharassment. Journalism Practice, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2294290
  32. Schoenebeck, S., Lampe, C., & Triệu, P. (2023). Online harassment: Assessing harms and remedies. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 20563051231157297. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157297
  33. Slaughter, A., & Newman, E. (2022). New frontiers: Moving beyond cyberbullying to define online harassment. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i2.5
  34. Sonni, A. F., Putri, V. C. C., & Irwanto, I. (2024). Bibliometric and content analysis of the scientific work on artificial intelligence in journalism. Journalism and Media, 5(2), 787-798. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5020051
  35. Stahel, L., & Schoen, C. (2020). Female journalists under attack? Explaining gender differences in reactions to audiences’ attacks. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1849-1867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819885333
  36. Stevens, F., Nurse, J. R. C., & Arief, B. (2021). Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 24(6), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0253
  37. Uwalaka, T., & Amadi, F. (2023). Beyond “Online notice-me”: Analysing online harassment experiences of journalists in Nigeria. Journalism Studies, 24(15), 1937-1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2260499
  38. Ültay, E., Akyurt, H., & Ültay, N. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde betimsel içerik analizi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 188-201. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
  39. Valenzuela-García, N., Maldonado-Guzmán, D. J., García-Pérez, A., & Del-Real, C. (2023). Too lucky to be a victim? An exploratory study of online harassment and hate messages faced by social media influencers. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29(3), 397-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09542-0
  40. Vogels, E. A. (2021, Ocak 13). The state of online harassment. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
  41. Waisbord, S. (2020). Mob censorship: Online harassment of US journalists in times of digital hate and populism. Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1030-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1818111
  42. Wilson, B. (2025, Nisan 7). Online Harassment. The Free Speech Center. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/online-harassment/
  43. Atıf İçin: Karal Temüroğlu, Ş. (2026). Gazetecilerin Çevrim İçi Tacizine İlişkin Makalelerin Bibliyometrik ve Betimsel İçerik Analizi, Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 10 (1), 192-225.