Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of The Relationship Between Ingrown Toenail and Hallux Interphalangeal Angle

Pages
356–361
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Deformities of the forefoot should be evaluated in patients with ingrown toenail

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Commonly encountered ingrown toenail has been associated especially with shoe properties and nail care.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 28 patients diagnosed with ingrown toenail without foot deformity except hallux interphalangeal angle were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Deformities of the forefoot should be evaluated in patients with ingrown toenail
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Commonly encountered ingrown toenail has been associated especially with shoe properties and nail care. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between hallux interphalangeal angle (HIA) and ingrown toenail. A total of 28 patients diagnosed with ingrown toenail without foot deformity except hallux interphalangeal angle were included in the study. Twenty-eight persons without any complaint of ingrown toenail or any foot deformity, and who presented due to any complaint other than lower extremity were enrolled as the control group. Hallux interphalangeal angle was calculated both in patients and control subjects with dorsoplantar projection of the foot, and compared between the groups. The groups were similar in age and gender, but showed differences in terms of HIA. The mean HIA value was significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group. HIA was higher in male patients with ingrown toenail, while this correlation could not be shown in female patients. Increased HIA may be among the risk factors for ingrown toenail. Deformities of the forefoot should be evaluated in patients with ingrown toenail

🔖

Cite This Article

KURU, T., OLÇAR, H. A. (2020). Evaluation of The Relationship Between Ingrown Toenail and Hallux Interphalangeal Angle. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 356–361. https://ajindex.com/articles/157396

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Cho SY, Kim YC, Choi JW. Epidemiology and bone-related comorbidities of ingrown nail: A nationwide population-based study. J Dermatol 2018; 45: 1418-1424
  2. Khunger N, Kandhari R. Ingrown toenails. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012; 78: 279-289
  3. Levy LA. Prevalence of chronic podiatric conditions in the US. National health survey 1990. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1992; 82: 221- 223
  4. Keeman JN. The ingrown nail. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1986; 130: 1431-4 (in Dutch)
  5. Heidelbaugh JJ, Lee H. Management of the ingrown toenail. Am Fam Physician 2009; 79: 303-308
  6. Heidary N, Naik H, Burgin S. Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 545- 570
  7. Córdoba-Fernández A, Montaño-Jiménez P, Coheña-Jiménez M. Relationship between the presence of abnormal hallux interphalangeal angle and risk of ingrown hallux nail: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16: 301
  8. Sorto LA, Balding MG, Weil LS, Smith SD. Hallux abductus interphalangeus. Etiology, xray evaluation and treatment. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1976; 66: 384-396
  9. Imai A, Takayama K, Satoh T, Katoh T, Yokozeki H. Ingrown nails and pachyonycHIA of the great toes impair lower limb functions: improvement of limb dysfunction by medical foot care. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50: 215-220
  10. Baran R, Haneke E, Richert B. Pincer nails: Definition and surgical treatment. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 261-266
  11. Langford DT, Burke C, Robertson K. Risk factors in onychocryptosis. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 45-48
  12. Mousavi SR, Khoshnevis J. A new surgical technique for ingrown toenail. ISRN Surg 2012; 2012: 438915
  13. De Berker DA, Baran R. Disorders of nails. In: Burns T, Breathnach SM, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology. 8th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell 2004; 65: 1 65.54
  14. Riviera A. Risk factors for amputation in diabetic patients: A case controlled study. Arch Med Res 1998; 29: 179-84
  15. James CW, McNelis KC, Cohen DM, Szabo S, Bincsik AK. Recurrent ingrown toenails secondary to indinavir/ritonavir combination therapy. Ann Pharmacother 2001; 35: 881-884
  16. Baran R. Retinoids and the nails. J Dermatol Treat 1990; 1: 151-154
  17. Higgins EM, Hughes JR, Snowden S, Pembroke AC. Cyclosporine induced periungual granulation tissue. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132: 829-830
  18. Venkatachalam S. Ingrowing great toenail following metatarsophalangeal joint fusion for hallux valgus: a case report and proposed mechanism of aetiology. J Foot Ankle Surg 2001;