Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Karadeniz Konteyner Terminallerinin Göreceli Etkinlik Analizi

Pages
1–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For that matter, it is essential for the ports to have theinternationally acceptable minimum performance indicators and to be capable ofperforming not only at national, but also at international standards by the natureof the work done, in order to continue operation under such intense competitionconditions.In this study, the year performance, 2011 of nine container terminals(Novorossiysk, Odessa, Varna, Burgas, Batumi, Poti, Ilyichevsk, Constanta andTrabzon) belonging to a total of six countries with coastlines to the Black Sea,which is the largest inland sea, as five countries from the TRACECA (TransportCorridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia) program (Turkey, Georgia, Ukraine, Bulgariaand Romania) and Russia out of the program, have been determined through theapplication of data envelopment analysis (DEA), as a non-parametric method.According to the results of the study, it has been determined that the Poti andNovorossiysk container terminals have been the efficient terminals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most of the world's freight transportation is made by maritimetransportation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The proportion of container transportation within maritimetransportation shows a constant increase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For that matter, it is essential for the ports to have theinternationally acceptable minimum performance indicators and to be capable ofperforming not only at national, but also at international standards by the natureof the work done, in order to continue operation under such intense competitionconditions.In this study, the year performance, 2011 of nine container terminals(Novorossiysk, Odessa, Varna, Burgas, Batumi, Poti, Ilyichevsk, Constanta andTrabzon) belonging to a total of six countries with coastlines to the Black Sea,which is the largest inland sea, as five countries from the TRACECA (TransportCorridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia) program (Turkey, Georgia, Ukraine, Bulgariaand Romania) and Russia out of the program, have been determined through theapplication of data envelopment analysis (DEA), as a non-parametric method.According to the results of the study, it has been determined that the Poti andNovorossiysk container terminals have been the efficient terminals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Karadeniz · konteyner terminal · veri zarflamaanalizi

Abstract

Most of the world's freight transportation is made by maritimetransportation. The proportion of container transportation within maritimetransportation shows a constant increase. As it is the case for other maritimetransportation systems, also in container transportation there is an intensecompetition among ports. For that matter, it is essential for the ports to have theinternationally acceptable minimum performance indicators and to be capable ofperforming not only at national, but also at international standards by the natureof the work done, in order to continue operation under such intense competitionconditions.In this study, the year performance, 2011 of nine container terminals(Novorossiysk, Odessa, Varna, Burgas, Batumi, Poti, Ilyichevsk, Constanta andTrabzon) belonging to a total of six countries with coastlines to the Black Sea,which is the largest inland sea, as five countries from the TRACECA (TransportCorridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia) program (Turkey, Georgia, Ukraine, Bulgariaand Romania) and Russia out of the program, have been determined through theapplication of data envelopment analysis (DEA), as a non-parametric method.According to the results of the study, it has been determined that the Poti andNovorossiysk container terminals have been the efficient terminals. On the otherhand, Burgas container terminal has been found out to be the terminal with thelowest performances.

Özet

Dünyada yük taşımacılığı en fazla denizyolu ile yapılmaktadır.Denizyolu taşımacılığı içerisinde konteyner taşımacılığının oranı sürekli artışgöstermektedir. Diğer denizyolu taşımacılık sistemlerinde olduğu gibi konteynertaşımacılığında da limanlar arasında yoğun bir rekabet vardır. Bu nedenlelimanların bu yoğun rekabet ortamında faaliyet gösterebilmeleri için, yapılanişin doğası gereği sadece ulusal değil uluslararası standartlarda işyapabilmeleri ve uluslararası geçerliliği olan performans göstergelerine sahipolmaları gereklidir.Bu çalışmada; Karadeniz çevresinde konteyner taşımacılığına hizmetveren ve TRACECA programı çerçevesinde Karadeniz’de faaliyet gösteren 5ülke (Türkiye, Gürcistan, Ukrayna, BulgaristanveRomanya) ve program dışındabulunan Rusya’ya ait toplam 9 konteyner terminali (Novorossisk, Odesa, Varna,Burgaz, Batum, Poti, Ilyichevsk, Köstenceve Trabzon) 2011 yıl görecelietkinlikleri parametrik olmayan Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) uygulaması ilebelirlenmiştir. VZA sonuçlarına göre, incelenen terminaller içerisinde Poti veNovorossisk konteyner terminali göreceli etkin durumdadır. Diğer yandan, endüşük göreceli etkinliğe sahip olan terminal ise Burgaz konteyner terminalidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, A., ESMER, S., ÇAKIR, E., BALCI, K. (2013). Karadeniz Konteyner Terminallerinin Göreceli Etkinlik Analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/157347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ADLER, N. ve GOLANY, B. (2001). Evaluation of Deregulated Airline Networks Using Data Envelopment Analysis Combined with Principal Component Analysis with an Application to Western Europe, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.132, No. 2, pp. 18–31.
  2. AL-ERAQI, A.S., MUSTAFA, A., KHADER, A. T. ve BARROS, C. P. (2008). Efficiency of Middle Eastern ve East African Seaports: Application of DEA Using Window Analysis. European Journal of Scientific Research ISSN 1450- 216X Vol.23 No.4, pp. 597-12.
  3. ATEŞ, A., KARADENİZ, Ş. ve ESMER, S. (2010). Dünya Konteyner Taşımacılığı Pazarında Türkiye’nin Yeri. Dokuz Eylul University, Maritime Faculty Journal. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.83-98.
  4. ATEŞ, A. (2010). Türkiye Konteyner Terminallerinde Verimlilik Analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  5. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. Erzurum. ATEŞ, A. ve ESMER, S. (2011).Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Türkiye’deki Konteyner Terminallerinin Etkinlik Ölçümü, 12th International Symposium on Econometrics Statistics and Operations Research, May 26-29,
  6. Denizli-TURKEY. AVKIRAN, N. K. (2001). Investigating Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Australian Universities Through Data Envelopment Analysis, SocioEconomic Planning Sciences, Vol.35. BANKER, R. D., CHARNES, A. ve COOPER, W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, Vol. 30, No.9, pp.251-253.
  7. BARROS, C.P. ve ATHANASSİOUS, M. (2004). Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence From Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 122-140.
  8. BARROS, C.P. (2006). A Beachmark Analysis of Italian Seaports Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 8, pp. 347-365.
  9. BAYSAL, M.E., UYGUR, M. ve TOKLU, B. (2004). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile TCDD Limanlarında Bir Etkinlik Ölçümü Çalışması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. Cilt. 19, No.4, ss.437-442.
  10. BOUSSOFIANE, A., DYSON, R. ve RHODES, E. (1991). Applied Data Envolopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, No. 6, pp. 1-15.
  11. BOWLIN, W.F. (1998). Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Anaysis (DEA), Journal of Cost Analysis, pp.3-27.
  12. BÜLBÜL, S. ve AKHİSAR, İ. (2005). Türk Sigorta Şirketlerinin Etkinliğinin Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Araştırılması. Marmara Üniversitesi Bankacılık ve Sigortacılık Yüksekokulu, http://www.ekonometridernegi.org/bildiriler/o 3s2 CHARNES, A., COOPER W.W. ve RHODES, E. (1978). Measuring