Journals / Alternatif Politika / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

THE END OF LABOR PARTY'S HEGEMONY IN ISRAELI POLITICS AND THE RISE OF LIKUD AND THE RADICAL RELIGIOUS PARTIES

İSRAİL SİYASETİNDE İŞÇİ PARTİSİ HEGEMONYASININ SONU VE LİKUD İLE RADİKAL DİNCİ PARTİLERİN YÜKSELİŞİ

Pages
374–405
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the one hand, with the encouragement of Likud and the efforts of religious Zionist parties, the transformation that took place in 1977, caused Israeli society to become more conservative; on the other hand, this transformation has created a political conjuncture that any topic regarding politics is started to be perceived as a problem of national security while two state solution is getting more and more unattainable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Labor Movement which ruled over the Jewish community of Palestine since the 1920s, controlled Israeli governments by parties belonging to this movement culminating in the Labor Party.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the new reality created by the results of the 1967 War (Six-Day War), has established a proper political ground for the Revisionist Movement to overthrow the Labor Party which had in fact systematically excluded revisionists from the political sphere.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the one hand, with the encouragement of Likud and the efforts of religious Zionist parties, the transformation that took place in 1977, caused Israeli society to become more conservative; on the other hand, this transformation has created a political conjuncture that any topic regarding politics is started to be perceived as a problem of national security while two state solution is getting more and more unattainable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Labor Movement which ruled over the Jewish community of Palestine since the 1920s, controlled Israeli governments by parties belonging to this movement culminating in the Labor Party. State and society were designed by the tradition of socialist Zionist Labor Party which actually carried the political agenda of the secular Ashkenazi Jews who created a new Jewish identity in Palestine when they moved there. However, the new reality created by the results of the 1967 War (Six-Day War), has established a proper political ground for the Revisionist Movement to overthrow the Labor Party which had in fact systematically excluded revisionists from the political sphere. On the one hand, with the encouragement of Likud and the efforts of religious Zionist parties, the transformation that took place in 1977, caused Israeli society to become more conservative; on the other hand, this transformation has created a political conjuncture that any topic regarding politics is started to be perceived as a problem of national security while two state solution is getting more and more unattainable.

Özet

Filistin Yahudi toplumuna 1920’lerden itibaren rehberlik etmiş bulunan Emek Hareketi, 1948’de kurulan İsrail’i otuz yıl boyunca İşçi Partisi geleneğinden gelen hükümetler üzerinden yönetmiştir. Sosyalist Siyonist İşçi Partisi geleneği, devlet ve toplumu, Doğu Avrupa’dan Filistin’e gelerek burada yeni bir Yahudi kimliği inşa etmiş bulunan seküler Aşkenaz Yahudilerin siyasal ajandaları çerçevesinde dizayn etmiştir. Ancak 1967 savaşının neticelerinin yarattığı yeni realite, o güne kadar iktidardan dışlanmış olan revizyonist harekete, İsrail’de müesses nizamı temsil eden İşçi Partisi hegemonyasını yıkma olanağı sunacak bir siyasal alan açmıştır. 1977 yılında yaşanan dönüşüm bir taraftan Likud’un teşviki ve radikal dinci partilerin gayretleriyle İsrail toplumunu muhafazakarlaştırırken, bir taraftan da siyasete ilişkin hemen her konunun bir ulusal güvenlik meselesi olarak anlaşıldığı, İsrail-Filistin meselesinin iki devletli çözümünün giderek daha imkânsız hale geldiği bir siyasal konjonktür yaratmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, Y. C. (2018). THE END OF LABOR PARTY'S HEGEMONY IN ISRAELI POLITICS AND THE RISE OF LIKUD AND THE RADICAL RELIGIOUS PARTIES. Alternatif Politika, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 374–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/157307

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaronsohn, Ran (1992), “Through th Eyes of a Settler's Wife: Letters from Moshava”, Bernstein, Deborah (Der.), Israel, Pioneers and Homemakers: Jewish Women in Pre-State (Albany: State University of New York): 1-28. Al‐Haj, Majid (1988), “The Arab internal refugees in Israel: The Emergence Of A Minority Within The Minority”, Immigrants & Minorities: Historical Studies in Ethnicity, Migration and Diaspora, 7 (2): 149-165.
  2. Almog, Oz (2000), The Sabra: The Creation of the New Jew (London: University of California Press). Arian, Asher ve Michal Shamir (2008), “A Decade Later, the World Had Changed, the Cleavage Structure Remained: Israel 1996-2006”, Party Politics, 14 (6): 685-705.
  3. Aronson, Michael (1980), “Geographical and Socioeconomic Factors in the 1881 Anti-Jewish Pogroms in Russia”, The Russian Review, 39 (1): 19-31.
  4. Avi-Hai, Avraham (1974),
  5. Ben Gurion, State Builder: Principles and Pragmatism, 1948-1963 (New York: Halsted Press). Ben‐Yehuda, Hemda (1997), “Attitude change and policy transformation: Yitzhak Rabin and the Palestinian question, 1967–95”, Israel Affairs, 3 (3-4): 201-224.
  6. Borochov, Ber (1984), Class Struggle and the Jewish Nation: Selected Essays in Marxist Zionism (New Jersey: Transaction Books). Bosma, Jaap (2010), “Plan Dalet in the Context of the Contradictions of Zionism”, Holy Land Studies, 9 (2): 209–227.
  7. Chetrit, Sami Shalom (2000), “Mizrahi Politics in Israel: Between Integration and Alternative”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 29 (4): 51-65.
  8. Clark, Terry Nicholas ve Seymour Martin Lipset (1991), “Are Social Classes Dying?”, International Sociology, 6 (4): 397-410.
  9. Cohen, Sacha Baron (2007), “Jewish Geopolitics: Nationalism and the Ties between the State and the Land”, National Identities, 9 (1): 27-34.
  10. Diskin, Hanna ve Abraham Diskin (1995), “The Politics of Electoral Reform in Israel”, International Political Science Review, 16 (1): 31-45.
  11. Don-Yehiya, Eliezer ve Charles S. Liebman (1981), “The Symbol System of Zionist-Socialism: An Aspect of Israeli Civil Religion”, Modern Judaism, 1 (2): 121-148.
  12. Ersoy, Tuğçe (2017), “Single State in Palestine: Constitutional Patriotism As A Conceptual Framework”, Bulletin of Palestine Studies, 1: 36-60.
  13. Etzioni-Halevy, Eva (2016), “The Divided People Revisited”, Ben-Rafael, Eliezer, J. Schoeps, Y. Sternberg ve O. Glöckner (Der.), Handbook of Israel: Major Debates (Berlin: Ge Gruyter): 245-259.
  14. Ferziger, Jonathan, “Israeli Settlements”, https://www.bloomberg.com/quicktake/israeli-settlements (22