SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

The Assessment of The Effect of Cycloplegia on Biometric Measurements in Various Age Groups

Ayse CICEK
Esra VURAL
Bedirhan ALABAY
Ender SIRAKAYA
Hayrettin COBANOGLU
Muhammed Raşit SIREM
Sefa UNAL
Pages
210–215
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was no signifi cant difference IOL power calculated using Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Barrett and SRK-T formulas in all groups while there was signifi cant difference in IOL power calculated using Olsen formula in subjects under 40 years old.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of cycloplegia by cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% on biometric measurements obtained by Lenstar LS 900 and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculated by Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Barrett, Olsen and SRK-T formulas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The study included56 eyes of 56 healthy volunteers aged ≤18 years in group 1, 35 eyes of 35 healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years in group 2 and 72 eyes of 72 healthy volunteers aged >40 years in group 3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was no signifi cant difference IOL power calculated using Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Barrett and SRK-T formulas in all groups while there was signifi cant difference in IOL power calculated using Olsen formula in subjects under 40 years old.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of cycloplegia by cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% on biometric measurements obtained by Lenstar LS 900 and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculated by Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Barrett, Olsen and SRK-T formulas. Material and Methods: The study included56 eyes of 56 healthy volunteers aged ≤18 years in group 1, 35 eyes of 35 healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years in group 2 and 72 eyes of 72 healthy volunteers aged >40 years in group 3. Topical cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1 % was applied to all volunteers. The biometric measurements were performed by Lenstar LS900 before and after cycloplegia. Results: The mean age was 12.1±3.6 years (5-17 years) in group 1; 24.6±3.9 years (20-35 years) in group 2; and 56.1±8.8 years (40-73 years) in group 3. Signifi cant differences were detected in lens thickness and anterior chamber depth in all groups after cycloplegia (p< 0.01). There were signifi cant differences in IOL power calculated using Olsen formula before and after cycloplegia: 0.13±0.33 D (-0.5 - 1.0 D) in group 1 and 0.21±0.32 D (-0.5 - 1.0 D) in group 2 (p< 0.01). Conclusion: There was no signifi cant difference IOL power calculated using Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Barrett and SRK-T formulas in all groups while there was signifi cant difference in IOL power calculated using Olsen formula in subjects under 40 years old.

🔖

Cite This Article

CICEK, A., VURAL, E., ALABAY, B., SIRAKAYA, E., COBANOGLU, H., SIREM, M. R., UNAL, S. (2020). The Assessment of The Effect of Cycloplegia on Biometric Measurements in Various Age Groups. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 210–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/157141

References (13)

  1. Turczynowska M,1Koźlik-Nowakowska K, Gaca-Wysocka M, et al. Effective ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. European Ophthalmic Review, 2016;10:94-100
  2. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2000;238:765-73
  3. Momeni-Moghaddam H, Maddah N, Wolffsohn JS, et al. The Effect of Cycloplegia on the Ocular Biometric and Anterior Segment Parameters: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8:387-95 4. Arici C, Turk A, Ceylan OM, et al. The effect of topical 1% cyclopentolate on IOLMaster biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1343-7
  4. Özyol P, Özyol E, Baldemir E. Changes in ocular parameters and intraocular lens powers in aging cycloplegic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;173:76-83
  5. Cheung SW, Chan R, Cheng R, et al. Effect of cycloplegia on axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements in children. Clin Exp Optom.2009;92:476-81
  6. Higashiyama T, Iwasa M, Ohji M. Changes in the anterior segment after cycloplegia with a biometer using sweptsource optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2017; 14;12:e0183378
  7. Huang J, McAlinden C, Su B, et al. The effect of cycloplegia on the Lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1691-6
  8. Gürsoy H, Bilge MD, Bilgin M. Okul Çağı Çocuklarında Sikloplejinin Optik Biyometriye Etkisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2016;25:245-50
  9. Raina UK, Gupta SK, Gupta A, et al. Effect of Cycloplegia on Optical Biometry in Pediatric Eyes. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;1;55:260-5
  10. Zocher MT, Rozema JJ, Oertel N, et al. Biometry and visual function of a healthy cohort in Leipzig, Germany. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016; 7;16:79 12. Sampathkumar S, Fan S, Morris N, et al. Aqueous humour dynamics and biometrics in the ageing Chinese eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1290-6
  11. Koç M, Tekin K, Özçelik D, et al. The Effect of Topical Cyclopentolate on Anterior Segment Biometry. Journal of Glaucoma - Cataract 2017:12;1
  12. Olsen T, Corydon L, Gimbel H. Intraocular lens power calculation with an improved anterior chamber depth prediction algorithm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:313- 9
  13. Rodriguez-Raton A, Jimenez-Alvarez M, Arteche-Limousin L, et al. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25:309- 14