SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of hemogram parameters in diabetic patients with coronary artery ectasia

Mehmet İNANIR
Pages
63–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the increased some hemogram parameters may be useful in predicting disease in diabetic patients with CAE.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the importance of hemogram parameters in predicting the disease in diabetic patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE) and normal coronary artery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The records of 7287 patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2017 and October 2019 were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the increased some hemogram parameters may be useful in predicting disease in diabetic patients with CAE.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To compare the importance of hemogram parameters in predicting the disease in diabetic patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE) and normal coronary artery. Methods: The records of 7287 patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2017 and October 2019 were reviewed. After appropriate exclusions, diabetic patients were divided into coronary artery ectasia and normal coronary artery groups. A total of 248 patients were included in the study and hemogram parameters of these two groups were compared. Results: Compared to control group white blood count (WBC) [8 (4-13) vs. 7 (5-12) u/mm3, p=0.023], hemoglobin [13 (10-16) vs. 14 (10-20) gr/dL, p=0.015], red cell distribution width (RDW) [16 (14-20) vs. 15 (12-19) %, p=0.026], neutrophil [4.5 (2.1-11.4) vs. 4.0 (0.2-7.5) u/mm3, p=0.003], platelet counts (Plt) [266 (196-450) vs. 236 (163-362) k/mm3 p<0.001] ], platelet distribution width (PDW) (17.9 (16.2-20.4) vs. 17.7 (15.9-19.7) % p=0.011), mean platelet volume (MPV) [8.4 (6.4- 11.2) vs. 7.9 (6.6-10.1) Fl, p=0.015], plateletcrit (PCT) [0.20 (0.14-0.32) vs. 0.19 (0.13-0.26), p<0.001], and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [2.1 (1.0-9.7) vs. 1.6 (0.2-5.7), p=0.002] were significantly higher in CAE patients. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the increased some hemogram parameters may be useful in predicting disease in diabetic patients with CAE.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNANIR, M. (2020). Evaluation of hemogram parameters in diabetic patients with coronary artery ectasia. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 63–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/156987

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Endoh S, Andoh H, Sonoyama K, et al. Clinical Features of Coronary Artery Ectasia. J Cardiol. 2004
  2. 43(2):45–52. [2]Befeler B, Aranda MJ, Embi A, et al. Coronary artery aneurysms: study of the etiology, clinical course and effect on left ventricular function and prognosis. Am J Med. 1977
  3. 62(4):597–607. [3]Zeina AR, Sharif D, Blinder J, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery ectasia using multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis. 2007
  4. 18(3):175-80. [4]Sultana R, Sultana N, Ishaq M, et al. The prevalence and clinical profile of angiographic coronary ectasia. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011
  5. 61(4):372-75. [5]Demopoulos VP, Olympios CD, Fakiolas CN, et al. The natural history of aneurysmal coronary artery disease. Heart. 1997
  6. 78(2):136-41. [6]Díaz-Zamudio M, Bacilio-Pérez U, HerreraZarza MC, et al. Coronary artery aneurysms and ectasia: role of coronary CT angiography. Radiographics. 2009
  7. 29(7):1939-54. [7]al-Harthi SS, Nouh MS, Arafa M, et al. Aneurysmal dilatation of the coronary arteries: diagnostic patterns and clinical significance. Int J Cardiol. 1991
  8. 30(2):191- 94. [8]Manginas A, Cokkinos DV. Coronary artery ectasias: imaging, functional assessment and clinical implications. Eur Heart J. 2006
  9. 27(9):1026-31. [9]Sarli B, Baktir AO, Saglam H, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with severity of coronary artery ectasia. Angiology. 2014
  10. 65(2):147-51. [10]Antoniadis AP, Chatzizisis YS, Giannoglou GD. Pathogenetic mechanisms of coronary ectasia. Int J Cardiol. 2008
  11. 130(3):335–43. [11]Mavrogeni S. Coronary artery ectasia: from diagnosis to treatment. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010
  12. 51(2):158–63. [12]Neunteufl T, Katzenschlager R, Hassan A, et al. Systemic endothelial dysfunction is related to the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 1997
  13. 129(1):111–18. [13]Li JJ, He JG, Nan JL, et al. Is systemic inflammation responsible for coronary artery ectasia? Int J Cardiol. 2008
  14. 130(2):e69–e70. [14]Aydin M, Tekin IO, Dogan SM, et al. The levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia. Mediators Inflamm. 2009
  15. 106145. [15]Zografos TA, Korovesis S, Giazitzoglou E, et al. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with coronary artery ectasia. Int J Cardiol. 2013
  16. 167(4):1536–41. [16]Papadakis MC, Manginas A, Cotileas P, et al. Documentation of slow coronary flow by the TIMI frame count in patients with coronary ectasia. Am J Cardiol. 2001