SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE CAPABILITY THROUGH A MULTISECTORAL STUDY: DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF THE “CHANGE MANAGEMENT SCALE”

ÇOK SEKTÖRLÜ BİR ÇALIŞMAYLA ÖRGÜTSEL DEĞİŞİM KAPASİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: “DEĞİŞİM YÖNETİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ” NİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ VE PSİKOMETRİK GEÇERLİLİĞİNİN DOĞRULANMASI

Abdullah Çalışkan(Toros Üniversitesi)0000-0001-5746-8550
Pages
65–94
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The scale items are presented in both English and Turkish at the end of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today’s dynamic organizational environments, the capability to manage change effectively has become a critical determinant of institutional success and sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Criterion-related validity was examined through correlations between the CMS and the Openness to Organizational Change Scale, demonstrating a positive and significant relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The scale items are presented in both English and Turkish at the end of the study.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değişim yönetimi · örgütsel değişim yetkinliği · ölçek geliştirme

Abstract

In today’s dynamic organizational environments, the capability to manage change effectively has become a critical determinant of institutional success and sustainability. This study aims to develop and validate the Change Management Scale (CMS), a multidimensional tool designed to assess organizations’ ability to plan, implement, and institutionalize change. The research employed a quantitative design and collected data from three sectors—education, healthcare, and energy/renewable energy—where change processes are both rapid and deeply impactful. To establish the structural validity of the CMS, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted on data obtained from three independent sample groups. Criterion-related validity was examined through correlations between the CMS and the Openness to Organizational Change Scale, demonstrating a positive and significant relationship. The EFA and CFA results supported a three-factor structure—Strategic Decision and Leadership, Preparation and Planning, and Implementation, Monitoring, and Institutionalization—with satisfactory model fit indices. Reliability analyses revealed Cronbach’s alpha coefficients above .70 for all dimensions, indicating high internal consistency. The findings confirm that the CMS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring change management practices across diverse organizational settings. Its concise structure and sector-neutral design make it suitable for application in various industries and cultural contexts. The CMS contributes to both theory and practice by providing researchers and practitioners with a practical framework for assessing, monitoring, and enhancing organizational change capability. The scale items are presented in both English and Turkish at the end of the study.

Özet

Günümüzün dinamik örgütsel ortamlarında değişimi etkili bir şekilde yönetebilme yetkinliği, kurumsal başarının ve sürdürülebilirliğin kritik bir belirleyicisi haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, örgütlerin değişim süreçlerini planlama, uygulama ve kurumsallaştırma kapasitesini ölçmek amacıyla tasarlanan Değişim Yönetimi Ölçeği (DYÖ)’nün geliştirilmesini ve geçerliliğinin test edilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma nicel bir desenle yürütülmüş ve değişimin hızlı ve derin biçimde hissedildiği eğitim, sağlık ve enerji/yenilenebilir enerji sektörlerinde görev yapan çalışanlardan veriler toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapısal geçerliliğini belirlemek amacıyla üç bağımsız örneklem grubundan elde edilen veriler üzerinde Keşfedici Faktör Analizi (KFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca, ölçüt bağımlı geçerlilik kapsamında, DYÖ ile Örgütsel Değişime Açıklık Ölçeği arasındaki korelasyon incelenmiş ve anlamlı pozitif ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. KFA ve DFA sonuçları, ölçeğin “Stratejik Karar ve Liderlik”, “Hazırlık ve Planlama” ile “Uygulama, İzleme ve Kurumsallaştırma” olmak üzere üç boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Tüm boyutlarda Cronbach Alfa katsayılarının .70’in üzerinde bulunması, ölçeğin yüksek düzeyde güvenilir olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Elde edilen bulgular, DYÖ’nün farklı örgütsel ortamlarda değişim yönetimi uygulamalarını değerlendirmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu kanıtlamaktadır. Ölçeğin özlü ve sektörler arası uygulanabilir yapısı, araştırmacı ve uygulayıcılara örgütsel değişim yetkinliğini değerlendirme, izleme ve geliştirme konusunda pratik bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Ölçek maddeleri çalışmanın sonunda hem İngilizce hem de Türkçe olarak sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çalışkan, A. (2025). ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE CAPABILITY THROUGH A MULTISECTORAL STUDY: DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF THE “CHANGE MANAGEMENT SCALE”. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 65–94. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1811002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (96)

  1. Ademola, O. E. (2024). Change Management Trends in the AI Modern World: Adapting to the Future of Work. Journal of Behavioral Informatics, 10(1), 41-50.
  2. Aitken, K., & Von Treuer, K. (2021). Leadership behaviours that foster organisational identification during change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(2), 311-326.
  3. Al Owad, A., Yadav, N., Kumar, V., Swarnakar, V., Jayakrishna, K., Haridy, S., & Yadav, V. (2025). Integrated Lean Six Sigma and Kotter change management framework for emergency healthcare services in Saudi Arabia. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(1), 299-331.
  4. Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234–262.
  5. Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J. L., & Shafiq, H. (2017). Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764–782.
  6. Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00004-5
  7. Bagga, S. K., Gera, S., & Haque, S. N. (2023). The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 120-131.
  8. Barak, M. (2018). Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change. Computers & Education, 121, 115-123.
  9. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  10. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
  11. Bielienkova, O., Ryzhakova, G., Kulikov, O., Akselrod, R., & Loktionova, Y. (2024). Formation of Organizational Change Management Strategies Based on Fuzzy Set Methods. In Data-Centric Business and Applications: Modern Trends in Financial and Innovation Data Processes 2023. Volume 1 (pp. 251-275). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  12. Bridges, W. (1991). Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  13. Burnes, B. (2004). Managing change (4th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
  14. Burnes, B. (2017). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(3), 232–257.
  15. Burnes, B. (2017). Managing change (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  16. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
  17. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  18. By, R. T. (2021). Organizational change and leadership: Out of the quagmire. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 1–15.
  19. By, R. T., Kuipers, B., & Procter, S. (2018). Understanding teams in order to understand organizational change: The OTIC model of organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 18(2), 83–100.
  20. Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2020). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. (5th ed.), Kogan Page Publishers.
  21. Chabi, P., & Saygılı, R. F. (2024). Trade openness and structural change dynamics in West African countries. Journal of Economic Structures, 13(1), 6.
  22. Chawla, A., & Kevin Kelloway, E. (2004). Predicting openness and commitment to change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(6), 485-498.
  23. Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations, 69(1), 33–60.
  24. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  25. Çalışkan A. (2007). Organizasyonel Değişim Yönetimi ve Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti’ndeki Türk Menşeli İşletmelerde Bir Uygulama, Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Isparta.
  26. Çalışkan, A. & Koç, M. (2025). Intention To Quit Scale: A New Approach In The Context Of Changing Working Conditions. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11 (1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1682394
  27. Çalışkan, A. (2022a). Örgütsel Değişime Açıklık: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. Aksaray Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1069524
  28. Çalışkan, A. (2022b). Örgütsel Etik İklimi: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 34-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1118411
  29. Çalışkan, A. ve Pekkan, N. Ü. (2020). Örgütsel dışlanma: bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (1), 51-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.736413
  30. Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, Ö. (2023). Job Satisfaction: A Scale Development Study. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (2), 112-134. https://dx.doi.org/10.54969/abuijss.1440762
  31. Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2025). Digital Leadership in the Effectiveness of Organizational Crisis Management: Digital Complexity, Scrum, and Agile Leadership. in A. Uğurlu Kara & M. Sağbaş (Eds.), Leaders of the Digital Age: Strategies For Managing the Future (pp. 45–52). Berlin: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b22819
  32. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
  33. Ercan, İ & Kan, İ. (2004). Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik, Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3):211-216.
  34. Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 18479790211016273.
  35. Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. London: Pitman.
  36. Ferede, W. L., Endawoke, Y., & Tessema, G. (2024). Change management through strategic leadership: the mediating effect of knowledge management in public organizations, Ethiopia. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 93.
  37. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  38. Franklin, M. (2021). Agile change management: A practical framework for successful change planning and implementation. Kogan Page Publishers.
  39. Gartner. (2024). Tackling change fatigue in organizations. Gartner Insights. https://www.gartner.com/en/insights/change-management
  40. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  41. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Edition Prentice Hall.
  42. Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C; & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA.
  43. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev., 31, 2–24.
  44. Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where do models for change management, improvement and implementation meet? A systematic review of the applications of change management models in healthcare. Journal of healthcare leadership, 85-108.
  45. Hayes, J. (2022). The theory and practice of change management. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  46. Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci Research. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), 53–60.
  47. Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291–298.
  48. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  49. Jääskä, E., Aaltonen, K., Hellens, L., & Kujala, J. (2025). Bridging change and project management: A review and future research directions. Project Leadership and Society, 6, 100172.
  50. Jinga, A. A., Hussen, J. O., Negash, H. G., & Estifanos, A. B. (2024). Leadership behavior and organizational change management in selected public universities of Ethiopia: Exploring the impact of leadership influences and change processes. Heliyon, 10(19).
  51. Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). Faktör analizi. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  52. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  53. Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., Al-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y., & Atshan, N. A. (2023). Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19137-19160.
  54. Klaus, P. (2020). Measuring customer experience: How to develop and execute the most profitable customer experience strategies. Palgrave Macmillan.
  55. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Publications. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  56. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Accelerate: Building strategic agility for a faster-moving world. Harvard Business Review Press.
  57. Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Macmillan.
  58. Laig, R. B. D., & Abocejo, F. T. (2021). Change management process in a mining company: Kotter’s 8-step change model. Journal of Management, Economics, and Industrial Organization, 5(3), 31-50.
  59. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  60. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  61. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
  62. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
  63. Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
  64. Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G. C. ve Guarino, C. (2005). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation‖, SAGE Publications. ISBN-13: 978-1412904124.
  65. Peng, J., Li, M., Wang, Z., & Lin, Y. (2021). Transformational leadership and employees’ reactions to organizational change: Evidence from a meta-analysis. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 57(3), 369-397.
  66. Peters, T., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
  67. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
  68. Pollak, T., Grabner, I., & Schröder, S. (2022). Change management: From theory to practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 867502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867502
  69. Prosci. (2023a). The Prosci ADKAR® model overview. https://www.prosci.com/methodology/adkar
  70. Prosci. (2023b). Best practices in change management. https://www.prosci.com/resources/best-practices-in-change-management
  71. Purnomo, E. N., Imron, A., Wiyono, B. B., Sobri, A. Y., & Dami, Z. A. (2024). Transformation of digital-based school culture: Implications of change management on virtual learning environment integration. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2303562.
  72. Rachmad, Y. E. (2022). Change Management Theory. Tilburg Textiel Boek Internationale Uitgeverij, Speciale Editie 2022.
  73. Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2016). Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 40–50.
  74. Rosdiana, N., & Aslami, N. (2022). The Main Models of Change Management in Kurt Lewin's Thinking. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Dan Bisnis Digital, 1(2), 251-256.
  75. Rousseau, D. M., & Ten Have, S. (2022). Evidence-based change management. Organizational Dynamics, 51(3), 100899.
  76. Sancak, I. E. (2023). Change management in sustainability transformation: A model for business organizations. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117165.
  77. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H ve Müller H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness of-fit measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8 (2), 23-74.
  78. Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginner's Guide To Structural Equation Modeling, Second Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  79. Schweizer, K. (2014). On the Ways of Investigating the Discriminant Validity of a Scale in Giving Special Emphasis to Estimation Problems When Investigating Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56(1), 45-59.
  80. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  81. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
  82. Senturia, T., Flees, L., & Maceda, M. (2008). Why change programs don’t produce change. McKinsey Quarterly.
  83. Sinval, J., Miller, V., & Marôco, J. (2021). Openness toward organizational change scale (OTOCS): Validity evidence from Brazil and Portugal. Plos One, 16(4), e0249986.
  84. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
  85. Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  86. Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752–788.
  87. Şimşek, H., & Şahin, A. (2024). Bridging change and project management: A systematic review. International Journal of Project Management, 42(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.09.002
  88. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  89. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
  90. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  91. Todnem, R. (2020). Planned and emergent change in organizations. In D. B. Szabla, W. A. Pasmore, M. A. Barnes, & A. B. Gipson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of organizational change thinkers (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan.
  92. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  93. Westen, D. & Rosenthal R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (3), 608-618.
  94. Williams, D. A., & Wade-Golden, K. C. (2023). The chief diversity officer: Strategy structure, and change management. Taylor & Francis.
  95. Worley, C. G., & Mohrman, S. A. (2021). Is change management obsolete? Organizational Dynamics, 50(2), 1–10.
  96. Zainab, B., Akbar, W., & Siddiqui, F. (2022). Impact of transformational leadership and transparent communication on employee openness to change: mediating role of employee organization trust and moderated role of change-related self-efficacy. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(1), 1-13.