SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Language Teaching

Dil Öğretiminde Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına İlişkin Araştırma Eğilimlerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Emre Musa Turhan(NIGDE OMER HALISDEMIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0003-3139-5052
Pages
41–75
Publication Date
2026-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal a significant increase in publication output, particularly after 2023, indicating the growing impact of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT on the field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the structure and development trends of scientific production on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in language teaching through a bibliometric approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 2,402 studies were included in the analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal a significant increase in publication output, particularly after 2023, indicating the growing impact of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT on the field.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yapay zeka · Dil öğretimi · Bibliyometrik analiz

Abstract

This study aims to examine the structure and development trends of scientific production on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in language teaching through a bibliometric approach. Data were collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database and limited to peer-reviewed journal articles published in English and indexed in SSCI, SCI-EXP, and ESCI. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 2,402 studies were included in the analysis. The data were analyzed using VOSviewer 1.6.20 to identify publication trends, influential authors and institutions, citation networks, co-authorship structures, and thematic clusters. The final dataset consisted of 2,402 articles, providing a broad overview of the intellectual and collaborative structure of the field. China emerged as the most productive country/region with 888 publications, while the Education University of Hong Kong was the most productive institution with 82 publications. The findings reveal a significant increase in publication output, particularly after 2023, indicating the growing impact of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT on the field. While Asian institutions, especially those based in Hong Kong and China, dominate both publication and citation metrics, collaboration networks remain relatively fragmented, suggesting that the field has not yet reached full integration. Citation and co-authorship analyses indicate that certain authors and institutions play central roles in shaping the intellectual structure of the field. In addition, thematic analysis highlights the prominence of topics such as writing, feedback, and AI-supported language learning environments. Overall, the results suggest that AI in language teaching has evolved into a rapidly expanding and dynamic research area. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive mapping of the field and offering insights for researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers.

Özet

Bu çalışma, dil öğretiminde yapay zekâ (YZ) kullanımına ilişkin bilimsel üretimin yapısını ve gelişim eğilimlerini bibliyometrik bir yaklaşımla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma verileri Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından elde edilmiş; yalnızca İngilizce dilinde yayımlanan ve SSCI, SCI-EXP ile ESCI indekslerinde yer alan hakemli dergi makaleleri çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Dâhil etme ve dışlama ölçütlerinin uygulanmasının ardından toplam 2402 çalışma analiz kapsamına alınmıştır. Veriler; yayın eğilimlerini, etkili yazar ve kurumları, atıf ağlarını, ortak yazarlık yapılarını ve tematik kümeleri belirlemek amacıyla VOSviewer programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Nihai veri seti 2402 makaleden oluşmuş ve alanın entelektüel yapısı ile iş birliği örüntülerine ilişkin kapsamlı bir görünüm sunmuştur. Çin 888 yayınla en üretken ülke/bölge olarak öne çıkarken, Education University of Hong Kong 82 yayınla en üretken kurum olmuştur. Araştırma bulguları, özellikle 2023 yılı sonrasında yayın sayılarında belirgin bir artış yaşandığını ve ChatGPT gibi üretken yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin alan üzerindeki etkisinin giderek güçlendiğini göstermektedir. Özellikle Hong Kong ve Çin merkezli Asya kurumlarının hem yayın hem de atıf göstergelerinde öne çıktığı görülürken, iş birliği ağlarının görece parçalı bir yapı sergilediği ve alanın henüz tam anlamıyla bütünleşmediği anlaşılmaktadır. Atıf ve ortak yazarlık analizleri, bazı yazar ve kurumların alanın entelektüel yapısının şekillenmesinde merkezî bir rol üstlendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca tematik analiz sonuçları, yazma, geri bildirim ve YZ destekli dil öğrenme ortamları gibi konuların öne çıktığını göstermektedir. Genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde, dil öğretiminde yapay zekâ kullanımının hızla büyüyen ve dinamik bir araştırma alanına dönüştüğü görülmektedir. Çalışma, alanın kapsamlı bir haritasını sunarak araştırmacılar, uygulayıcılar ve karar vericiler için önemli çıkarımlar ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turhan, E. M. (2026). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Language Teaching. Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 41–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/1564335

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  2. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
  3. Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
  4. Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
  5. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  7. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
  8. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors and contributions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47.
  9. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  10. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  11. Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012). Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.12
  12. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  13. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
  14. Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and learner perceptions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
  15. Fathi, J., Mohammaddokht, F., & Asadi, S. (2024). Improving EFL learners' speaking skills and willingness to communicate via ChatGPT. System, 121, 103224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103224
  16. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
  17. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 26(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73474
  18. Guo, K., & Wang, Y. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT's potential in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 3491–3513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11949-5
  19. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  20. Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
  21. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131.
  22. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  23. Jeon, J. (2024). Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: Young learners’ experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2181112
  24. Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15873–15892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
  25. Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(4), 612–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2183654
  26. Kannan, J., & Munday, P. (2018). New trends in second language learning and teaching through the lens of ICT, networked learning, and artificial intelligence. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 76, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.62495
  27. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  28. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
  29. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
  30. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468
  31. Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169
  32. Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and conceptualisation. Oxford University Press.
  33. Liang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4270–4296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348
  34. Liu, G., & Ma, X. (2024). Measuring EFL learners' use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2244373
  35. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
  36. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
  37. Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
  38. Mohamed, A. M. (2024). Exploring the potential of an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) in English language teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 11289–11312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z
  39. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
  40. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  41. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in higher education: A cautionary tale for university teaching and learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
  42. Pokrivčáková, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025
  43. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
  44. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity.
  45. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  46. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  47. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
  48. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970
  49. Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
  50. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  51. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629