SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 51

INTEGRATING MARX AND SIMMEL ON SOCIAL CONFLICT: THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS AND MODERN-DAY IMPLICATIONS

Bütünleştirici Bir Perspektifle Marx ve Simmel’in Toplumsal Çatışma Kuramı ve Güncel Yansımaları

Burcu Gedikli(Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı)0000-0002-5339-6366
Mehmet Eren Gedikli(Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı)0000-0002-6036-6683
Pages
687–700
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concludes that a combined reading of Marx and Simmel offers a richer framework for understanding conflict as both a product of inequality and a driver of social integration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines social conflict theory through an integrative lens by combining the perspectives of Karl Marx and Georg Simmel.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rather than viewing conflict solely as destructive, it highlights its constructive and transformative roles in shaping social structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concludes that a combined reading of Marx and Simmel offers a richer framework for understanding conflict as both a product of inequality and a driver of social integration.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marx · Simmel · toplumsal çatışma

Abstract

This article examines social conflict theory through an integrative lens by combining the perspectives of Karl Marx and Georg Simmel. Rather than viewing conflict solely as destructive, it highlights its constructive and transformative roles in shaping social structures. Marx interprets conflict as a class-based struggle rooted in economic relations, emphasizing historical materialism and structural inequality as engines of social change. In contrast, Simmel conceptualizes conflict as a universal and functional form of social interaction, central to group cohesion and identity formation. The article presents a comparative analysis of these two approaches—Marx’s macro-level structural focus and Simmel’s micro-level formal perspective—arguing that they are theoretically complementary. It also explores the relevance of their theories to contemporary issues such as capitalism, the money economy, metropolitan life, globalization, and social movements. The study concludes that a combined reading of Marx and Simmel offers a richer framework for understanding conflict as both a product of inequality and a driver of social integration.

Özet

Bu çalışma, toplumsal çatışma kuramını Karl Marx ve Georg Simmel’in yaklaşımlarını bir araya getirerek bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla ele almaktadır. Sosyolojik düşüncede çatışma, yalnızca yıkıcı değil, aynı zamanda toplumsal değişim ve dönüşümün yapıcı bir unsuru olarak da değerlendirilir. Marx, çatışmayı üretim ilişkilerine dayalı sınıf mücadelesi çerçevesinde ele alırken; ekonomik eşitsizliklerin tarihsel süreçteki dönüşümün motor gücü olduğunu savunur. Buna karşılık Simmel, çatışmayı sosyal etkileşimin evrensel bir biçimi olarak görür ve onun grup içi dayanışmayı güçlendirme, sınırları yeniden tanımlama gibi işlevlerine dikkat çeker. Çalışmada, Marx’ın yapısal ve ekonomik düzeydeki analizleri ile Simmel’in etkileşimsel ve biçimsel yaklaşımı karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiş; bu iki kuramın birbirini dışlamayan, aksine tamamlayıcı açıklama olanakları sunduğu ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca günümüzde kapitalizm, para ekonomisi, metropol yaşamı, küreselleşme ve sosyal hareketler bağlamında çatışmanın çağdaş biçimleri değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gedikli, B., Gedikli, M. E. (2026). INTEGRATING MARX AND SIMMEL ON SOCIAL CONFLICT: THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS AND MODERN-DAY IMPLICATIONS. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 51, 687–700. https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.1880041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Ahmed, S., Raihan, M. Z., Islam, N. (2013). Labor unrest in the ready-made garment industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(15), 68-80.
  2. Allen, P. & Melcarek, H. (2009). Organic agriculture and food security: Saving the environment, feeding the world? In C. Francis (Ed.), Organic Farming: The Ecological System.
  3. Altuntaş, A. (2012). Sürdürülebilir toplumlar ve metropollerin baskılarından kurtulmak için alternatif bir yol: Sürdürülebilir kentler. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(17), 135-148.
  4. Bianchi, F. (2020). Making bonds of solidarity from economic exchange. A review essay. Sociologica, 14(1).
  5. Boewe, J. & Schulten, J. (2019). The long struggle of the Amazon employees. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Brussels Office.
  6. Bosna, C. (2019). The language in the processes of globalization. Review of the Air Force Academy, 1(39), 85-88.
  7. Calhoun, C. (2013). Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 26-38.
  8. Carter, C. (2017). Globalization and cultural identity of art works. Monitor ISH, 19(2), 81-110.
  9. Carrabine, E. (2006). Michel Foucault. In J. Scott (Ed.), Fifty Key Sociologists: The Contemporary Theorists. Routledge.
  10. Collins, R. (2000). Conflict theory. In E. F. Borgatta, R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology. Macmillan Reference.
  11. Curtis, J. (2021). Farmers’ protests in India and agricultural reforms. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9226/CBP-9226.pdf
  12. Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  13. D’Alessandro, S., Cieplinski, A., Distefano, T., Dittmer, K. (2020). Feasible alternatives to green growth. Nature Sustainability, (3), 329-335.
  14. Fopp, D., Axelsson, I., Tille, L. (2024). Fridays for Future and Extinction Rebellion start to grow. In The Youth Climate Uprising: From The School Strike Movement to an Ecophilosophy of Democracy (pp. 61-76). http://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.15944970.7
  15. Garnett, T. (2013). Food sustainability: Problems, perspectives and solutions. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72(1), 29-39.
  16. Gedikli, B. (2022). Küreselleşme ve adil ticaret. Süleyman Demirel Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(43), 186-216.
  17. Guillen, M. F. (2001). The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton University Press.
  18. Harvey, D. (2015). On yedi çelişki ve kapitalizmin sonu. (Trans: E. Soğancılar), Sel Yayıncılık.
  19. Inglis, D. (2009). Globalization and food: The dialectics of globality and locality. In B. A. Turner (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies. Routledge.
  20. Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon & Schuster.
  21. Lukacs, G. (2021). History and class consciousness. Foreign Language Press.
  22. Mahler, D. G., Yonzan, N., Lakner, C. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on global inequality and poverty (Policy Research Working Paper No. 10198). World Bank Group.
  23. Malik, A. & Awadallah, B. (2011). The economics of the Arab Spring. CSAE Working Paper.
  24. Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1974). Manifest der kommunistischen Partei. https://www.marxists.org/deutsch/archiv/marx-engels/1848/manifest/1-bourprol.htm
  25. Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2017). Deutsche ideologie manuskripte und drucke. De Gruyter.
  26. McMichael, P. (2000). The power of food. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(1), 21-33.
  27. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  28. Mills, W. C. (2000). The power elite. Oxford University Press.
  29. Moellendorf, D. (2009). Global inequality matters. Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. Münch, R. (2016). The global division of labour: Development and inequality in world society. Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Nyuyen, T. C. (2022). The effects of financial crisis on income inequality. Development Policy Review, 40(6).
  32. Pathiranage, H. S. K. (2024). Precarious employment in the gig economy: Understanding the roles of employed poor. Open Journal of Business and Management, (12), 2288-2307.
  33. Piketty, T. (2000). Yirmi birinci yüzyılda kapital. (Trans: H. Koçak), Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  34. Rapoport, H., Sardoschau, S., Silve, A. (2020). Migration and cultural change. CepII Working Paper.
  35. Ray, L. (2006). Anthony Gramsci. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Reich, K. (2018). Surplues values - A new theory of forms of capital in our times. https://www.uni-koeln.de/hf/konstrukt/english/surplus_value/reich_surplus_values_2018.pdf
  37. Shultziner, D. & Kornblit, I. S. (2020). French Yellow Vests (Gilets Jaunes): Similarities and differences with Occupy movements. Sociological Forum, 35(2), 535-542.
  38. Simmel, G. (1911a). Der Begriff und die Tragödie der Kultur. In Philosophische Kultur: Gesammelte Essais. Graphisches Institut Julius Klinkhardt.
  39. Simmel, G. (1911b). Soziologie der Geselligkeit. In Deutscher Soziologentag (Ed.), Verhandlungen des ersten Deutschen Soziologentages (19.-22. Oktober 1910 in Frankfurt a.M.) (pp. 1-6). Mohr (Paul Siebeck). https://archive.org/details/verhandlungendes00deut
  40. Simmel, G. (1987). Philosophie des Geldes. Duncker & Humblot.
  41. Simmel, G. (2009). Metropol ve zihinsel hayat. (Trans: T. Birkan), In Bireysellik ve Kültür. Metis Yayınları.
  42. Simmel, G. (2013). Der Streit. In Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berliner Buchdruckerei Union GmbH.
  43. Standing, G. (2019). Prekarya: Yeni tehlikeli sınıf. (Trans: E. Bulut), İletişim Yayınları.
  44. Sotshangane, N. (2002). What impact globalization has on cultural diversity? Alternatives Turkish Journal of International Relations, 1(4), 214-231.
  45. UNEP. (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/decoupling-natural-resource-use-and-environmental-impacts-economic-growth
  46. Vallas, S. P. & Kronberg, A. K. (2023). Coercion, consent, and class consciousness: How workers respond to Amazon’s production regime. Socius, 9.
  47. Wallace, R. A. & Wolf, A. (1995). Contemporary sociological theory: Continuing the classical tradition. Prentice Hall.
  48. Weber, M. (2013). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Mohr Siebeck.