Journals / Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Understanding Türkiye’s Changing Role Based On President Erdoğan’s Post-2014 Narrative

Türkiye’nin Değişen Rolünü Erdoğan’ın 2014 Sonrası Söylemine Bakarak Anlamak

Mehmet Furkan Ergül(National Chengchi University)0000-0003-1685-4783
Shun-wen Wang(Chinese Cultural University)0000-0001-8453-5712
Pages
93–106
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Especially the war between Russia and Ukraine and the subsequent energy crisis strengthened Türkiye’s position as a mediator and a trading country even further, and accelerated the second transition process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the establishment of the Republic, the role conceptions of Türkiye had largely remained unchanged until 2011 and Turkish foreign policy has been based on these roles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the findings of the study, during Erdoğan’s prime ministry and presidency until 2022, by which this study was conducted, Türkiye’s role conceptions and foreign policy choices based on these conceptions can be divided into four categories, two transition periods and two main periods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Especially the war between Russia and Ukraine and the subsequent energy crisis strengthened Türkiye’s position as a mediator and a trading country even further, and accelerated the second transition process.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rol Teorisi · Türkiye · Türk Dış Politikası

Abstract

Since the establishment of the Republic, the role conceptions of Türkiye had largely remained unchanged until 2011 and Turkish foreign policy has been based on these roles. However, after the beginning of the Arab Spring and the Syrian Civil War, Türkiye’s role conceptions have changed. The aim of this article is to explain the reasons of these policy changes by examining President Erdoğan’s statements. According to the findings of the study, during Erdoğan’s prime ministry and presidency until 2022, by which this study was conducted, Türkiye’s role conceptions and foreign policy choices based on these conceptions can be divided into four categories, two transition periods and two main periods. Türkiye is in the middle of the second transition period. Especially the war between Russia and Ukraine and the subsequent energy crisis strengthened Türkiye’s position as a mediator and a trading country even further, and accelerated the second transition process.

Özet

Cumhuriyetin kuruluşundan bu yana, 2011 yılına kadar Türkiye'nin rol anlayışları büyük ölçüde aynıydı ve Türk dış politikası bu rollere dayanıyordu. Ancak Arap Baharı ve Suriye İç Savaşı'nın başlamasının ardından Türkiye'nin rol anlayışları da değişim gösterdi. Bu makalenin amacı, Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan'ın konuşmalarını inceleyerek bu politika değişikliklerinin nedenlerini anlamaktır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, Erdoğan'ın başbakanlık ve cumhurbaşkanlığı döneminde Türkiye'nin rol anlayışları ve dış politika tercihleri iki geçiş dönemi ve iki ana dönem olmak üzere dört kategoriye ayrılmıştır. Türkiye, şu anda ikinci geçiş döneminde bulunuyor. Özellikle Rusya-Ukrayna savaşı ve ardından gelen enerji krizi, Türkiye'nin arabulucu ve ticaret ülkesi rollerini daha da güçlendirmiş ve ikinci geçiş sürecini hızlandırmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ergül, M. F., Wang, S. (2022). Understanding Türkiye’s Changing Role Based On President Erdoğan’s Post-2014 Narrative. Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 93–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/1563267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. AFP and TOI Staff. 2022. “In phone call with Biden, Erdogan stresses importance of Ukraine war mediation”, The Times of Israel, https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-phone-call-with-biden-erdogan-stresses-importance-of-ukraine-war-mediation/
  2. Amerika’nın Sesi. 2019. “Türkiye Sondaj Gemisi Yavuz’u Doğu Akdeniz’e Gönderdi”, Amerika’nın Sesi, amerikaninsesi.com/a/turkiye-sondaj-gemisi-yavuzu-dogu-akdenize-gonderdi/4966782.html
  3. Anadolu Agency. 2019. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan BM'de konuştu: Dünya 5'ten büyüktür, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-bmde-konustu-dunya-5ten-buyuktur/1592817
  4. Akbaba, Yasemin and Özdamar, Özgün. 2019. Role Theory in the Middle East and North Africa: Politics, Economics and Identity, Routledge: New York.
  5. Al Jazeera Türk. 2014. IŞİD’in Haritası, http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/isidin-haritasi
  6. Al Jazeera. 2022. Israeli president in Turkey in effort to mend ties, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/9/turkish-israeli-presidents-to-meet-after-15-years-to-mend-ties
  7. Aydın-Düzgit, Senem and Rumelili, Bahar (2019) “Discourse Analysis: Strengths and Shortcomings”, All Azimuth, 8(2):285-305.
  8. Baykan, Dildar. 2020. “15 Temmuz'un 4. yılında Türkiye'nin ABD'den Gülen'i iade talepleri yanıtsız kaldı”, Anadolu Agency, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/15-temmuz-darbe-girisimi/15-temmuzun-4-yilinda-turkiyenin-abdden-guleni-iade-talepleri-yanitsiz-kaldi-/1908447
  9. Bengtsson, Rikard and Ole Elgström. 2012. “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics”, Foreign Policy Analysis 8:93-108.
  10. Campbell, Steven. 2018. “Role Theory, Foreign Policy Advisers, and US Foreign Policymaking”, International. Journal of Social Sciences, 59(1):43-55
  11. Carta, Caterina and Morin, Jean-Frederic. 2014. “Struggling over meanings: Discourses on the EU’s international presence”, Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3):295-314.
  12. CNN. 2009. “Obama says U.S., Turkey can be model for world”, CNN, https://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/06/obama.turkey/
  13. CNN Türk. 2008. “Türkiye'nin arabuluculuğu resmen açıklandı”, CNN Türk, https://www.cnnturk.com/2008/dunya/05/21/turkiyenin.arabuluculugu.resmen.aciklandi/461537.0/index.html
  14. Cömert, Yusuf Ziya. 2009. “Dünya barışı için model ülke Türkiye”, Yeni Şafak, https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/barisi-icin-model-ulke-turkiye-227534
  15. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. 2004. “Türkiye Merkez Ülke Olmalı”, Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/yorum/turkiye-merkez-ulke-olmali-702116/
  16. Fairclough, Norman L. 1985. “Critical and Descriptive Goals in Discourse Analysis”, Journal of Pragmatics.
  17. Girard, Renaud. 2022. “How Erdogan’s Turkey Became a Peacemaker”, Radix, https://radixuk.org/opinion/how-erdogans-turkey-became-a-peacemaker/
  18. Gritten, David. 2022. “Saudi crown prince visits Turkey for first time since Khashoggi murder”, BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-61892389
  19. Habertürk. 2014. Erdoğan yemin etti!, https://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/984702-erdogan-yemin-etti
  20. Habertürk. 2017. FETÖ'nün Silahlı Terör Örgütü Olduğuna İlişkin Değerlendirme, https://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/1509084-fetonun-silahli-teror-orgutu-olduguna-iliskin-degerlendirme
  21. Hansen Lene. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, London: Routledge. in Aydın-Düzgit S. (2014), “Critical discourse analysis in analysing European Union foreign policy: Prospects and challenges”, Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3): 354-367.
  22. Harnisch Sebastian. Sebastian Bersick and Carsten Gottwald (eds). 2016. China’s International Roles, London: Routledge.
  23. Harnisch, Sebastian. 2012. “Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning”, Foreign. Policy Analysis 8:47-69
  24. Hoffman, Max. 2021. Flashpoints in U.S.-Turkey Relations in 2021, Center for American Progress.
  25. Holsti, Kalevi J. 1970. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 14:233-309.
  26. Hölzscheiter, Anna. 2013. “Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification: Discourse Theory and Analysis in International Relations”, International Studies Perspectives, 2014(15): 142-162.
  27. Huang, Chiung-Chiu. 2020. “Interpreting Vietnam’s China policy from the perspective of role theory: independent role versus interactive role”, International Relations 34(4):524-543.
  28. Hürriyet. 2013. “Dış politikada 'değerli yalnızlık' dönemi”, Hürriyet, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/dis-politikada-degerli-yalnizlik-donemi-24553602
  29. Hürriyet. 2016. Dakika dakika darbe girişimi, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/dakika-dakika-darbe-girisimi-15-16-temmuz-2016-40149409
  30. Kaarbo, Juliet. 2018. “A foreign policy analysis perspective on After Victory”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2018:1-11.
  31. Klose, Stephan. 2020. “Interactionist role theory meets ontological security studies: an exploration of synergies between socio-psychological approaches to the study of international relations”, European Journal of International Relations, 26(3):851-874.
  32. Kokkinidis, Tasos. 2022. “Alexandroupolis a “Key Port” for U.S. Military Presence in Greece”, Greek Reporter, https://greekreporter.com/2022/05/10/alexandroupolis-military-u-s-greece/
  33. Melo, Daniela F. 2019. “Outmaneuvering Kissinger: Role Theory, US Intra-elite Conflict, and the Portuguese Revolution”, Foreign Policy Analysis 15:224-243.
  34. Obama, Barrack. 2009. “Remarks By President Obama To The Turkish Parliament”, The White House Office of the Press Secretary, April 6, 2009.
  35. Ovalı, Şevket. 2013. “Decoding Turkey’s Lust for Regional Clout in the Middle East: A Role Theory Perspective”, Journal of International and Area Studies 20(1):1-21.
  36. Pimiento, Alberto. 2014. “2015 Yılına Mülteci Krizi Damga Vurdu”, Amerika’nın Sesi, https://www.amerikaninsesi.com/a/yilina-multeci-krizi-damga-vurdu/3113676.html
  37. Potter, Jonathan and Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, Sage, London.
  38. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey. 2014. Letonya ile Demokratik Değerler Temelinde Kurduğumuz İlişkiler Her Geçen Gün Gelişiyor, https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/1452/letonya-ile-demokratik-degerler-temelinde-kurdugumuz-iliskiler-her-gecen-gun-gelisiyor
  39. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey. 2014. Orta Doğu’daki Bölgesel Meseleler, Ancak Adil, Kapsayıcı ve Bütünlükçü Bir Yaklaşımla Çözülebilir, https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/1470/orta-dogudaki-bolgesel-meseleler-ancak-adil-kapsayici-ve-butunlukcu-bir-yaklasimla-cozulebilir
  40. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey. 2015. İslam İşbirliği Teşkilatı Parlamento Birliği (İSİPAB) 10. Konferansı'nda Yaptıkları Konuşma, https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/2975/islam-isbirligi-teskilati-parlamento-birligi-isipab-10-konferansinda-yaptiklari-konusma
  41. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Directorate of Communications. 2019. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: “Savunma sanayinde Türkiye’yi küresel güç haline getireceğiz”, https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/haberler/detay/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-savunma-sanayinde-turkiyeyi-kuresel-guc-haline-getirecegiz
  42. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Directorate of Communications. 2019. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: “İha’ları, Siha’ları, Akıncı‘yı nasıl yapıyorsak, Allah’ın izniyle uçağımızı da yapacağız”, https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/haberler/detay/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-ihalari-sihalari-akinciyi-nasil-yapiyorsak-allahin-izniyle-ucagimizi-da-yapacagiz
  43. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Directorate of Communications. 2021. President Erdoğan: Muslims should now take responsibility for the security and future of all humanity, and raise their voices against the injustices they witness, https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/english/haberler/detay/president-erdogan-muslims-should-now-take-responsibility-for-the-security-and-future-of-all-humanity-and-raise-their-voices-against-the-injustices-they-witness
  44. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Directorate of Communications. 2021. Türkiye is one of the few countries in the world that can truly exercise their sovereign rights, https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/english/haberler/detay/turkiye-is-one-of-the-few-countries-in-the-world-that-can-truly-exercise-their-sovereign-rights
  45. Rose, Gideon. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics, 51(1):144-172.
  46. Schweller, Randall L. 2004. “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing”, International Security, 29(2):159-201.
  47. Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, Rahime. 2019. “Role theory, the European Union and Turkish regional foreign policy”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18(35):681-700.
  48. Thies, Cameron G. 2003. “Sense and Sensibility in the Study of State Socialisation: A Reply to Kai Alderson.”, Review of International Studies 29(4):543-550.
  49. TRT Haber. 2021. Fırat Kalkanı Harekatı'nın üzerinden 5 yıl geçti, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/firat-kalkani-harekatinin-uzerinden-5-yil-gecti-603807.html
  50. Tziarras, Zenonas (ed.). 2019. The New Geopolitics of the Eastern Mediterranean: Trilateral Partnerships and Regional Security, Oslo:Peace Research Institute Oslo.
  51. Ziemer, Veronica. 2009. Zwischen Europa und Amerika.Polens Außenß und Sicherheitspolitik nach 1989, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.