Journals / Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

From Competition to Coordination: The Administrative Turn in American Political Economy, 1890–1920

Rekabetten Koordinasyona Geçiş: Amerikan Siyasal Ekonomisinde İdari Dönüşüm, 1890–1920

Pages
60–72
Publication Date
2025-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the study contends that the rise of American economic authority rested on the institutionalization of administrative capacities that rendered interdependence governable across expanding national and international networks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the transformation of American economic authority between 1890 and 1920, arguing that a market-centered order gradually shifted toward a system increasingly grounded in administrative coordination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis employs qualitative document analysis, reading contemporaneous public narratives alongside fiscal and institutional developments to trace how stability came to be defined in terms of continuity, predictability, and oversight rather than market spontaneity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the study contends that the rise of American economic authority rested on the institutionalization of administrative capacities that rendered interdependence governable across expanding national and international networks.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik Devlet · Dolaşım · Koordinasyon

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of American economic authority between 1890 and 1920, arguing that a market-centered order gradually shifted toward a system increasingly grounded in administrative coordination. It aims to show that U.S. economic power was not derived solely from rising production or expanding trade, but from the governance of circulation—the movement of goods, capital, labor, and information. The analysis employs qualitative document analysis, reading contemporaneous public narratives alongside fiscal and institutional developments to trace how stability came to be defined in terms of continuity, predictability, and oversight rather than market spontaneity. Taxation policy, corporate scale, labor-time regulation, logistical and shipping infrastructures, and the institutional design of central banking are examined as interconnected mechanisms through which coordination was normalized and operationalized. The findings suggest that wartime disruption and recurrent crises accelerated the consolidation of coordinated economic management and strengthened the institutional role of fiscal and monetary instruments in stabilizing circulation and mitigating volatility. Overall, the study contends that the rise of American economic authority rested on the institutionalization of administrative capacities that rendered interdependence governable across expanding national and international networks.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 1890–1920 yılları arasında Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde piyasa rekabetine dayalı ekonomik düzenin giderek koordinasyon temelli idari yapılara evrilmesini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, ulusal ekonomik gücün yalnızca üretim artışı ya da dış ticaret genişlemesiyle değil; mal, sermaye, emek ve bilginin hareketi olarak tanımlanan dolaşımın yönetimi yoluyla kurulduğunu göstermektir. Araştırma, dönemsel kamusal anlatılar ile mali ve kurumsal düzenlemeleri birlikte ele alan nitel bir doküman analizi yaklaşımına dayanır. Vergilendirme politikaları, kurumsal ölçeklenme, emek-zaman düzenlemeleri, lojistik altyapı, deniz taşımacılığına ilişkin korumacı uygulamalar ve merkez bankacılığına ilişkin kurumsal tasarımlar; istikrarın rekabetten ziyade süreklilik, öngörülebilirlik ve idari gözetim üzerinden tanımlandığı bir yönetişim mantığı içinde değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, savaş ve kriz koşullarının koordinasyon mekanizmalarını hızlandırdığını; maliye ve para politikası araçlarının, dolaşımın sürekliliğini sağlama ve dalgalanmaları sınırlama amacıyla kurumsallaştığını göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, ABD’nin ekonomik yükselişinin serbest piyasanın kendiliğinden işleyişinden çok, dolaşımı istikrara kavuşturmayı hedefleyen idari kapasite ve kurumsal tasarım üzerinden şekillendiğini ileri sürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kisić, T. K. (2025). From Competition to Coordination: The Administrative Turn in American Political Economy, 1890–1920. Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 60–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/1563237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Alfred D. Chandler, J. (1977). The Visible Hand, the Managerial Revolution in American Business. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  2. Crafts, N. (2000). Globalization and Growth in the Twentieth Century. Globalization and Growth in the Twentieth Century: An Overview (World Economic Outlook: Supporting Studies) (s. 1-30). içinde Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
  3. . Federal Reserve system: The first 100 years. Philadelphia, PA: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  4. Frieden, J. A. (2006). Global Capitalism. New York: Norton.
  5. Leonard, T. C. (2009). Economic Reform in the Progressive Era. History of Political Economy, 41(1), 109-141.
  6. (12 Dec 1920). News - US, Washington Post (DC), 1904-1921. Washington D.C.: Allen County Public Library.
  7. Pazarskis, V. (2024). The U.S. Economy and its Global Contribution. Journal of Global Economics, 12(6).
  8. Petro, S. (1975). Competition, Monopoly and the Role of Government. B. B. Greaves içinde, Free Market Economics: A Basic Reader (s. 156–158). Irvington-on-Hudson, New York.
  9. (23 Feb 1950). Reports on Businesses, compiled 1945 - 1950. United States National Archives, Roll: 0075 Record group: 260, National Archives Catalog ID: 1561455, File Number: 339.
  10. Rockoff, H. (2005). War and the American Economy. Department of Economics, Rutgers University, and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
  11. Rothbard, M. (2002). The Origins of the Federal Reserve. A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II (s. 87–165). içinde Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  12. Service, C. R. (2021). Introduction to U.S. Economy: The Business Cycle and Economic Indicators. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Rapor No: IF1041.
  13. The Atlanta Constitution, 1.-1. (10 Oct 1895). Atlanta: Allen County Public Library.
  14. The Atlanta Constitution, 1.-1. (13 Aug 1914). Allen County Public Library.
  15. Tsiflikidou, I.-M., & Metaxas, T. (2023). Economic Crises in the 20th Century: Brief Review and Comparison. University of Thessaly, Department of Economics, MPRA Paper No. 122466.
  16. US The Atlanta Constitution, 1.-1. (10 Oct 1895). Atlanta: Allen County Public Library.
  17. US The Atlanta Constitution, 1.-1. (13 Aug 1914). Atlanta: Allen County Public Library.
  18. US Washington Post (DC), 1.-1. (14 Sep 1919). Washington D.C.: Allen County Public Library.
  19. US Washington Post (DC), 1.-1. (22 May 1917). Allen County Public Library.
  20. US Washington Post (DC), 1.-1. (27 Oct 1916). Washington D.C.: Allen County Public Library.
  21. US Washington Post (DC), 1.-1. (9 Oct 1917). Washington DC: Allen County Public Library.
  22. Wallach, P. A. (2017). Federalism and the Fed: The Federal Reserve System’s Role in American Federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(3), 436–461.
  23. Yılmaz, A., & Alganer, H. (tarih yok). The Evolution of Administrative State in the United States (USA) and the Impact of Woodrow Wilson. Journal of History School (JOHS), 7(17), 299–318.
  24. Yılmaz, M. A., & Alganer, A. (2014). The Formation, Historical Progress, Function and Global Effects of Fed. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 64(2), 35-58.
  25. (23 Feb 1950). Reports on Businesses, compiled 1945 - 1950. United States National Archives, Roll: 0075 Record group: 260, National Archives Catalog ID: 1561455, File Number: 339.
  26. Yılmaz, M. A., & Alganer, A. (2014). The Formation, Historical Progress, Function and Global Effects of Fed. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 64(2), 35-58.