SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Urban Green Space Evaluation in The Scope of Perceived Sensory Dimensions: The Example of Aydın Turistik Park

Algısal Duyu Karakteristikleri Kapsamında Kentsel Yeşil Alan Değerlendirmesi: Aydın Turistik Park Örneği

Sezen Özçetin(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Cansu Aykan(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0009-6288-4845
Abdullah Akpınar(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
187–200
Publication Date
2023-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After redesigning the Touristic Park, the park received 60.5 points out of 80 points, making it more suitable for Perceived Sensory Dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The importance of urban green spaces in terms of human mental and physical health is increasing daily.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with the purpose of the study, the status of the Turistik Park was examined according to the 8 Perceived Sensory Dimensions, and the park's current status was determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After redesigning the Touristic Park, the park received 60.5 points out of 80 points, making it more suitable for Perceived Sensory Dimensions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algısal duyu karakteristikleri · kentsel yeşil alan · Turistik Park

Abstract

The importance of urban green spaces in terms of human mental and physical health is increasing daily. In recent years, it has been determined that green areas with Perceived Sensory Dimensions have positive effects on human mental and physical health. In this context, it is aimed to evaluate the Turistik Park located in Aydın province of Efeler district within the scope of Perceived Sensory Dimensions and to make a design that will make this park more suitable for Perceived Sensory Dimensions. In line with the purpose of the study, the status of the Turistik Park was examined according to the 8 Perceived Sensory Dimensions, and the park's current status was determined. Subsequently, it has been redesigned to ensure compliance with the Perceived Sensory Dimensions of the Turistik Park. It was determined that the current status of Turistik Park received 29.8 points out of 80 points. After redesigning the Touristic Park, the park received 60.5 points out of 80 points, making it more suitable for Perceived Sensory Dimensions.

Özet

Kentsel yeşil alanların insan ruh ve beden sağlığı açısından önemi her geçen gün artmaktadır. Öyle ki, son yıllarda Algısal Duyu Karakteristik özelliklerine sahip yeşil alanların insan ruh ve beden sağlığına olumlu etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda, bu çalışmada Aydın ili Efeler ilçesinde yer alan Turistik Park’ı Algısal Duyu Karakteristikleri kapsamında değerlendirmek ve bu parkı Algısal Duyu Karakteristikleri özelliklerine daha uygun hale getirecek tasarımın yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı doğrultusunda Turistik Park’ın durumu 8 Algısal Duyu Karakteristik özelliklerine göre irdelenmiş ve parkın güncel durumu tespit edilmiştir. Devamında Turistik Park’ın Algısal Duyu Karakteristik özelliklerine uyumluluğunu sağlamak için yeniden tasarlanmıştır. Yapılan değerlendirme Turistik Park’ın mevcut durumunun 80 puan üzerinden 29,8 puan aldığı belirlenmiştir. Turistik Park’ın yeniden tasarlanması sonrasında park 80 puan üzerinden 60,5 puan alarak Algısal Duyu Karakteristik özelliklerine daha uygun hale getirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özçetin, S., Aykan, C., Akpınar, A. (2023). Urban Green Space Evaluation in The Scope of Perceived Sensory Dimensions: The Example of Aydın Turistik Park. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.51552/peyad.1338541

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Akpınar, A. (2021). How perceived sensory dimensions of urban green spaces are associated with teenagers’ perceived restoration, stress, and mental health?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104185.
  2. Cannon, W. B. (1932). The Wisdom of the Body. New York: W W Norton and Co.
  3. Chen, M. ve Lin,G. (2023) How perceived sensory dimensions of urban green spaces affect cultural ecosystem benefits: A study on Haizhu Wetland Park, China, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 86, 2023, 127983, ISSN 1618-8667.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127983.
  4. Cox, D.T., Hudson, H.L., Shanahan, D.F., Fuller, R.A. ve Gaston, K.J. (2017). The rarity of direct experiences of nature in an urban population. Landsc. Urban Plan. 160, 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.006
  5. Çevre Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. (2023). Kentsel- Kırsal Nüfus Oranı. https://cevreselgostergeler.csb.gov.tr/kentsel---kirsal-nufus-orani-i-85670#_ednref1 (Erişim Tarihi: 14.01.2023)
  6. Efeler Belediyesi. (2023). Efeler Coğrafya ve Yeryüzü Şekilleri. https://www.efeler.bel.tr/efeler/cografya-ve-yeryuzu-sekilleri.
  7. Felsten, G. (2009). Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.006
  8. Grahn, P., Stigsdotter, U. ve Berggren-Bärring, A. (2005). A planning tool for designing sustainable and healthy cities. The importance of experienced characteristics in urban green open spaces for people’s health and well-being. In Conference proceedings “Quality and Significance of Green Urban Areas”, 14-15.
  9. Grahn, P. ve Stigsdotter, U. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning. 94. 264-275. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012.
  10. Kaplan, R. ve Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. CUP Archive.
  11. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
  12. Malekinezhad, F. ve Lamit, H. (2017). Structural model to describe restoration experience from the impact of environmental qualities and mediation effect of perceived restorativeness. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
  13. Memari, S., Pazhouhanfar, M., ve Nourtaghani, A. (2017). Relationship between perceived sensory dimensions and stress restoration in care settings. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 26, 104-113.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.003
  14. Memari, S., Pazhouhanfar, M. ve Grahn, P. (2021). Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Green Areas: An Experimental Study on Stress Recovery. Sustainability.13(10):5419. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105419.
  15. Peschardt, K. ve Stigsdotter, U. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26-39.
  16. Selye, H. (1956). The Stress of Life. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  17. Stigsdotter, U. ve Grahn, P. (2011). Stressed individuals’ preferences for activities and environmental characteristics in green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10(4), 295-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.001.
  18. Stigsdotter, U., Corazon, S., Sidenius, U., Refshauge, A. ve Grahn, P. (2017). Forest design for mental health promotion—Using perceived sensory dimensions to elicit restorative responses. Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 160, ISSN 0169-2046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.012.
  19. Stoltz, J. ve Grahn, P. (2021) Perceived sensory dimensions: An evidence-based approach to greenspace aesthetics, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 59, 2021, 126989, ISSN 1618-8667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126989.
  20. Tennessen, C. ve Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0
  21. Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği. (2020, 12 04). Depresyon Konusunda Bilmek İstedikleriniz. https://psikiyatri.org.tr/halka-yonelik/24/depresyon-konusunda-bilmek-istedikleriniz (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2023)
  22. Ulrich, R. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and The Natural Environment, 85-125.
  23. Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 224(4647), 420-421.
  24. Ulrich, R., Simons, R., Losito, B., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. ve Zelson, M. (1991). Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 11: 201-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
  25. United Nations. (2018). Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Dynamics, Population Division. Retrieved from World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision.
  26. Yakınlar, N. (2020). Algısal Duyu Karakteristikleri Kapsamında Kentsel Yeşil Alanların Beden Sağlığı Restorasyonu Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi.
  27. Yakınlar, N. ve Akpınar, A. (2022). How perceived sensory dimensions of urban green spaces are associated with adults’ perceived restoration, stress, and mental health?, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Volume 72, 127572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127572.