Journals / Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8

Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Change: The case of Yozgat Province

Arazi Kullanımı ve Arazi Örtüsü Değişiminin Mekansal-Zamansal Analizi: Yozgat İli Örneği

Nezih Furkan Erbaş(TAPU VE KADASTRO 22. (YOZGAT) BÖLGE MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ)0000-0002-5888-4916
Nizamettin Erbaş(YOZGAT BOZOK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6379-3023
Abdullah Varlık(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2072-3313
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The classification accuracy was evaluated using confusion matrix analysis, Overall accuracy and Kappa metrics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Land use/land cover (LULC) change is one of the most important indicators of environmental transformation and regional landscape dynamics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to investigate the spatio-temporal LULC dynamics of Yozgat Province, Türkiye, between 2000 and 2024 using multi-temporal Landsat satellite imagery and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based spatial analysis techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The classification accuracy was evaluated using confusion matrix analysis, Overall accuracy and Kappa metrics.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:AÖ/AK · LANDSAT · YOZGAT

Abstract

Land use/land cover (LULC) change is one of the most important indicators of environmental transformation and regional landscape dynamics. Monitoring these changes is essential for understanding the impacts of urbanization, agricultural activities, and land conversion processes on semi-arid environments. This study aims to investigate the spatio-temporal LULC dynamics of Yozgat Province, Türkiye, between 2000 and 2024 using multi-temporal Landsat satellite imagery and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based spatial analysis techniques. Multi-temporal Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, and Landsat-8/9 OLI images with 30 m spatial resolution were obtained from the USGS Earth Explorer platform. Image preprocessing, clipping, classification and temporal change detection analyses were performed in ArcGIS/ArcMap 10.8. Four major land use classes were identified: agriculture, settlement, bare land and vegetation/water. Multi-temporal classification results were compared to quantify long-term land transformation patterns. The classification accuracy was evaluated using confusion matrix analysis, Overall accuracy and Kappa metrics. The results revealed significant changes in the spatial structure of Yozgat Province over the 24-year period. Settlement areas exhibited the most substantial increase, rising by 114.38%, indicating strong urban growth and infrastructure expansion. In contrast, bare land decreased by 54.13%, suggesting progressive conversion into agricultural and built-up surfaces. Agricultural land remained relatively stable with a moderate increase of 9.08%, while vegetation/water areas increased by 67.72%. The most pronounced transformation periods were identified between 2006–2012 and 2012–2018, during which major land conversion processes occurred. The findings demonstrate that urban expansion and the reduction of bare land are the dominant drivers of landscape transformation in Yozgat Province. This study provides valuable scientific evidence for sustainable land use planning, regional environmental management, and future GIS-based monitoring studies in semi-arid regions of Central Anatolia. The results demonstrate that remote sensing and GIS techniques provide reliable tools for long-term monitoring of LULC dynamics in semi-arid environments.

Özet

Arazi kullanım/arazi örtüsü (LULC) değişimi, çevresel dönüşümün ve bölgesel peyzaj dinamiklerinin en önemli göstergelerinden biridir. Bu değişikliklerin izlenmesi, kentleşmenin, tarımsal faaliyetlerin ve arazi dönüşüm süreçlerinin yarı kurak ortamlara etkilerini anlamak için elzemdir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin Yozgat ilinin 2000-2024 yılları arasındaki mekansal-zamansal LULC dinamiklerini, çok zamanlı Landsat uydu görüntüleri ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (GIS) tabanlı mekansal analiz teknikleri kullanarak araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. USGS Earth Explorer platformundan 30 m mekansal çözünürlüğe sahip çok zamanlı Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+ ve Landsat-8/9 OLI görüntüleri elde edilmiştir. Görüntü ön işleme, kırpma, sınıflandırma ve zamansal değişim tespiti analizleri ArcGIS/ArcMap 10.8'de gerçekleştirilmiştir. Dört ana arazi kullanım sınıfı belirlenmiştir: tarım, yerleşim, çıplak arazi ve bitki örtüsü/su. Uzun vadeli arazi dönüşüm modellerini nicelleştirmek için çok zamanlı sınıflandırma sonuçları karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar, Yozgat ilinin mekânsal yapısında 24 yıllık süre zarfında önemli değişiklikler olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Yerleşim alanları %114,38'lik artışla en büyük artışı göstermiş olup, bu da güçlü kentsel büyüme ve altyapı genişlemesine işaret etmektedir. Buna karşılık, çıplak arazi %54,13 oranında azalmış olup, tarımsal ve yapılaşmış alanlara kademeli dönüşümü göstermektedir. Tarım arazileri %9,08'lik ılımlı bir artışla nispeten istikrarlı kalırken, bitki örtüsü/su alanları %67,72 oranında artmıştır. En belirgin dönüşüm dönemleri, büyük arazi dönüşüm süreçlerinin yaşandığı 2006-2012 ve 2012-2018 yılları arasında belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, kentsel genişleme ve çıplak arazinin azalmasının Yozgat ilindeki peyzaj dönüşümünün baskın etkenleri olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, Orta Anadolu'nun yarı kurak bölgelerinde sürdürülebilir arazi kullanım planlaması, bölgesel çevre yönetimi ve gelecekteki CBS tabanlı izleme çalışmaları için değerli bilimsel kanıtlar sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erbaş, N. F., Erbaş, N., Varlık, A. (2026). Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Change: The case of Yozgat Province. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8. https://doi.org/10.56130/tucbis.1929814

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Bozkurt, S.G., Kuşak, L. & Akkemik, Ü. Correction to: Investigation of land cover (LC)/land use (LU) change affecting forest and seminatural ecosystems in Istanbul (Turkey) metropolitan area between 1990 and 2018. Environ Monit Assess 195, 399 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10975-7
  2. Celik, M. O., & Yakar, M. (2023). Arazi kullanımı ve arazi örtüsü değişikliklerinin uzaktan algılama ve cbs yöntemi ile izlenmesi: Mersin, Türkiye örneği. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi, 5(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.56130/tucbis.1300704
  3. Coppin, P., Lambin, E., Jonckheere, I., & Muys, B. (2002). Digital change detection methods in natural ecosystem monitoring: A review. Analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812777249_0001
  4. Cağlıyan, A., & Dagli, D. (2022). Monitoring land use land cover changes and modelling of urban growth using a future land use simulation model (FLUS) in Diyarbakır, Turkey. Sustainability, 14(15), 9180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159180
  5. Ding, H., & Shi, W. (2013). Land-use/land-cover change and its influence on surface temperature: a case study in Beijing City. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(15), 5503-5517. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.792966
  6. Dutta, D., Rahman, A., Paul, S. K., & Kundu, A. (2020). Estimating urban growth in peri-urban areas and its interrelationships with built-up density using earth observation datasets. The Annals of Regional Science, 65(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-00974-8
  7. DESA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs). 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: the 2018 Revision. United Nations, New York, USA. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
  8. Earthexplorer. (2024). Earthexplorer. Retrieved August 26, 2024, https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
  9. Erbaş, N. (2021). Comparative economic analysis of farms in Turkey and a critical assessment of the annual profitability: The case of Yozgat Province. Custos e agronegocıo on lıne, 17(1), 332-460.
  10. Erbaş, N. (2023). Sabı̇t Sermaye Yatırımlarının Genel Ve Kırsal İstı̇hdam Yönünden İncelenmesı̇: Yozgat İlı̇ Örneğı̇. 13 th International Conference on Agriculture, Animal Science and Rural Development, https://www.ispecongress.org/tarim, November 28-29, 2023 Uşak / Türkiye. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10406033
  11. Erbaş, N., & Çınarer, G. (2024). Abandonment of Agricultural Lands, Reasons and Sustainability: Evidence from Turkey. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 21. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr21.aalr
  12. Ergene, E. M., Bektaş Balçık, F., & Balik Şanlı, F. (2024). Trends analysis of agricultural drought in Central Anatolian Basin, Turkey. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-141-2024
  13. Ellis, E. C. (2011). Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1938), 1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331
  14. Ferynandari, A. M., Suhartanto, E., & Prasetyorini, L. (2026). Remote Sensing for Sustainable Development: Multi-Temporal Landsat Analysis of Land-Use Change and Urbanization in the Rejoso Watershed (2005–2024). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13639
  15. Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
  16. Guler, M., Yomralıoğlu, T., & Reis, S. (2007). Using landsat data to determine land use/land cover changes in Samsun, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127(1), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9270-1
  17. Gulersoy, E. A. (2013). Çorum merkez ilçede arazi kullanımının zamansal değişimi (1987-2011) ve çevresel etkileri. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000148
  18. Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., et al. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
  19. Hatab, A.A.; Cavinato, M.E.R.; Lindemer, A.; Lagerkvist, C.J. Urban Sprawl, Food Security and Agricultural Systems in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Cities 2019, 94, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.001
  20. Kadak, M. K. (2025). Spatiotemporal Assessment of LULC Changes Using Remote Sensing Approaches. Journal of Agricultural Production, 6(3), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.56430/japro.1777194
  21. Karakus, C. B., Cerit, O., & Kavak, K. S. (2014). Determination of Land Use/Cover Changes and Land Use Potentials of Sivas City and its Surroundings Using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS). Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 15, 454-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.08.040
  22. Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J., & Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 205–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459
  23. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondizio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365–2407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139863
  24. Meydan Yıldız, S. G., Bahçeci Başarmak, H. I., & Akın, E. S. (2022). Social and Administrative Dimensions of Urban Transformation andUrban Identity: Sample of Yozgat (Turkey). Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.997034
  25. Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. (2024). Yozgat Province Geography. Yozgat Provincial Directorate. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://yozgat.csb.gov.tr/ilimiz-cografyasi-2341
  26. Naboureh, A., Bian, J., Lei, G., & Li, A. (2021). A review of land use/land cover change mapping in the China-Central Asia-West Asia economic corridor countries. Big Earth Data, 5(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2020.1842305
  27. Oli, D., Gyawali, B., Neupane, B., & Oshikoya, S. (2025). Assessment of land use land cover change and its impact on variations of land surface temperature in Atlanta, USA. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 26, 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100712
  28. Ologunde, O. H., Kelani, M. O., Biru, M. K., Olayemi, A. B., & Nunes, M. R. (2025). Land use and land cover changes: a case study in Nigeria. Land, 14(2), 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020389
  29. Pirzada, M., Turi, K.H., Mari, I.H. & Lashari, O.A. (2025). Land Use Land Cover Changes: Conversion of Agricultural Land in District Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan. Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review 3(4). https://doi.org/10.63468/sshrr.162
  30. Roy, D. P., Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., et al. (2014). Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sensing of Environment, 145, 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.001
  31. Saha, M., & Saaj, M. S. S. (2026). Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Landsat Images to Explore LULC, LST, NDVI and NDWI Changing Pattern Using Geospatial Techniques: A Case Study of Dhaka Dıstrıct, Bangladesh. 8th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development(ICCESD 2026), 5-7 February 2026, KUET, Khulna, Bangladesh
  32. Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., & Reilly, M. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PloS one, 6(8), e23777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023777
  33. Singh, A. (1989). Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6), 989-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903939
  34. Sivrikaya, F., Başkent, E. Z., Şevik, U., Akgül, C., Kadıoğulları, A. İ., & Değermenci, A. S. (2010). A GIS-based decision support system for forest management plans in Turkey. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ), 9(7), 929-937.
  35. Turan, İ. D., Dengiz, O., & Kaya, N. S. (2021). Arazi örtüsü/arazi kullanım değişimlerinin farklı zamanlı landsat uydu görüntüleri ile belirlenmesi: Çarşamba delta ovası örneği. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.857787
  36. Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 20666–20671. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704119104
  37. Turk, S. T., & Balcik, F. B. (2023). Rastgele orman algoritması ve Sentinel-2 MSI ile fındık ekili alanların belirlenmesi: Piraziz Örneği. Geomatik, 8(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1127925
  38. Turkes, M., Koc, T., & Sarıs, F. (2009). Spatiotemporal variability of precipitation total series over Turkey. International Journal of Climatology, 29(8), 1056–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1768
  39. Turkes, M., & Akgunduz, A. S. (2011). Assessment of the desertification vulnerability of the Cappadocian district (Central Anatolia, Turkey) based on aridity and climate-process system. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(1), 1234-1268. https://j-humansciences.com/index.php/IJHS/article/view/1694
  40. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). (2023). Regional agricultural and population statistics for Yozgat Province. Retrieved April 13, 2026, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr
  41. Verburg, P. H., Crossman, N., Ellis, E. C., Heinimann, A., Hostert, P., Mertz, O., Nagendra, H., Sikor, T., Erb, K., Golubiewski, N., Grau, R., Grove, M., Konaté, S., Meyfroidt, P., Parker, D. C., Chowdhury, R. R., Shibata, H., Thomson, A., & Zhen, L. (2015). Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective. Anthropocene, 12, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2015.09.004
  42. Weng, Q. (2012). Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030