Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2024 / Volume: 10 Issue: 4

The impact of different ankle positions on postural balance and weight-bearing distributions during different kneeling positions

Sibel Bozgeyik(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FİZİK TEDAVİ VE REHABİLİTASYON FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-4156-6900
Ezgi Ünüvar Yüksel(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FİZİK TEDAVİ VE REHABİLİTASYON FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1606-3180
Gamze Arın Bal(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FİZİK TEDAVİ VE REHABİLİTASYON FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7427-4480
Fırat Tan(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FİZİK TEDAVİ VE REHABİLİTASYON FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9586-4041
Gizem İrem Kınıklı(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FİZİK TEDAVİ VE REHABİLİTASYON FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1013-6393
Hande Guney Deniz(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FİZİK TEDAVİ VE REHABİLİTASYON FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8315-8465
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings regarding balance and weight distribution in this study could be valuable for clinicians in evaluating different kneeling abilities among individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to investigate the variations in weight distribution and balance parameters between the knees when executing different kneeling positions with different ankle conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty-eight participants, with a mean age of 23.35 ± 3.29 years, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings regarding balance and weight distribution in this study could be valuable for clinicians in evaluating different kneeling abilities among individuals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ankle · kneeling · postural balance

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the variations in weight distribution and balance parameters between the knees when executing different kneeling positions with different ankle conditions. Twenty-eight participants, with a mean age of 23.35 ± 3.29 years, were included in the study. HurSmart balance system (HUR smart balance, HUR, Helsinki, Finland) was used for assessing the static balance and weight distribution characteristics of the knees during four different kneeling positions (Full kneeling with ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, upright kneeling with ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) for 30 seconds. Weight distribution on both the dominant and non-dominant knees, postural sways in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions, the sway area within which the center of gravity was maintained for 90% of the time, and the total trace length were collected. Reliability of the testing method was executed. The simple main effects analysis revealed that knee position had a statistically significant effect on trace length, sway area, anteroposterior and mediolateral sway (p<0.01). The trace length and sway area were higher during upright kneeling postures when compared to full kneeling position. The different ankle positions did not show a significant effect on the balance and weight distribution parameters (p>0.05). This study demonstrates that balance and weight distribution parameters differ significantly across various kneeling positions in healthy individuals. The findings regarding balance and weight distribution in this study could be valuable for clinicians in evaluating different kneeling abilities among individuals.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, F., Bozgeyik, S., Yüksel, E. Ü., Bal, G. A., Tan, F., Kınıklı, G. İ., Deniz, H. G. (2024). The impact of different ankle positions on postural balance and weight-bearing distributions during different kneeling positions. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Volume: 10 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.1560584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Amin, R., Vasan, V., Ethgen, O., Bruyère, O., Richy, F., Dardennes, C., Reginster, J., Weiss, J., Noble, P., & Conditt, M. (2020a). Kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg, 33(02), 138-143.
  2. Amin, R. M., Vasan, V., & Oni, J. K. (2020b). Kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg, 33(02), 138-143.
  3. Artz, N. J., Hassaballa, M. A., Robinson, J. R., Newman, J. H., Porteous, A. J., & Murray, J. R. (2015). Patient reported kneeling ability in fixed and mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 30(12), 2159-2163.
  4. Calvert, N. D., Smith, A., Kuster, L., Calvert, M., Ebert, J., Ackland, T., & Kuster, M. S. (2019). The kneeling test is a valid method of assessing kneeling tolerance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 27, 3705-3712.
  5. Carey, D. P., Smith, G., Smith, D. T., Shepherd, J. W., Skriver, J., Ord, L., & Rutland, A. (2001). Footedness in world soccer: an analysis of France'98. J Sport Sci, 19(11), 855-864.
  6. Coggon, D., Croft, P., Kellingray, S., Barrett, D., McLaren, M., & Cooper, C. (2000). Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheumatol, 43(7), 1443-1449.
  7. Granacher, U., Bridenbaugh, S. A., Muehlbauer, T., Wehrle, A., & Kressig, R. W. (2011). Age-related effects on postural control under multi-task conditions. Gerontology, 57(3), 247-255.
  8. Haj-Mirzaian, A., Mohajer, B., Guermazi, A., Roemer, F. W., Zikria, B., & Demehri, S. (2021). Kneeling as a risk factor of patellofemoral joint cartilage damage worsening: an exploratory analysis on the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Eur Radiol, 31, 2601-2609.
  9. Hassaballa, M., Porteous, A., Newman, J., & Rogers, C. (2003). Can knees kneel? Kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral knee arthroplasty. Knee, 10(2), 155-160.
  10. Kocak, F. U., Unver, B., Karatosun, V., & Bakirhan, S. (2009). Associations between radiographic changes and function, pain, range of motion, muscle strength and knee function score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Phys Ther Sci, 21(1), 93-97.
  11. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155-163.
  12. MacDonald, B., Kurdin, A., Somerville, L., Ross, D., MacDonald, S., & Lanting, B. (2021). The effect of sensory deficit after total knee arthroplasty on patient satisfaction and kneeling ability. Arthroplast Today, 7, 264-267. e2.
  13. Mezzarane, R. A., & Kohn, A. F. (2008). Postural control during kneeling. Exp Brain Res, 187, 395-405.
  14. Olex-Zarychta, D., & Raczek, J. (2008). The relationship of movement time to hand–foot laterality patterns. Laterality, 13(5), 439-455.
  15. Pollard, J. P., Porter, W. L., & Redfern, M. S. (2011). Forces and moments on the knee during kneeling and squatting. J Appl Biomech, 27(3), 233-241.
  16. Scott, C. E., Holland, G., Gillespie, M., Keenan, O. J., Gherman, A., MacDonald, D. J., Simpson, A. H. R., & Clement, N. D. (2021). The ability to kneel before and after total knee arthroplasty: the role of the pattern of osteoarthritis and the position of the femoral component. Bone Joint J, 103(9), 1514-1525.
  17. Thwaites, S., Rickman, M., & Thewlis, D. (2022). Visualising knee loading patterns during kneeling and the development of a laboratory-based adaptation of the Aberdeen Weight-Bearing Test (Knee). Knee, 38, 201-211.