SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of the quadriceps angle assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Musa Eymir(ERZURUM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9671-9583
Nihat Demirhan Demirkıran(KUTAHYA HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0724-9672
Bayram Ünver(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9829-5884
Mehmet Erduran(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0668-7224
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, our results suggest that the goniometric measurement, as an inexpensive and radiation-free alternative, can be used to assess the Q-angle as accurately as radiography, in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifaceted degenerative disease characterized by knee alignment alterations that impact the amplitude of the quadriceps angle (Q-angle).
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, accurate assessment of this parameter necessitates the implementation of standardized and reliable measures to ensure methodological reproducibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, our results suggest that the goniometric measurement, as an inexpensive and radiation-free alternative, can be used to assess the Q-angle as accurately as radiography, in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Goniometer · knee osteoarthritis · minimal detectable change

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifaceted degenerative disease characterized by knee alignment alterations that impact the amplitude of the quadriceps angle (Q-angle). Q-angle is a diagnostic measure of knee alignment, and an indicator of the load distribution of patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints. However, accurate assessment of this parameter necessitates the implementation of standardized and reliable measures to ensure methodological reproducibility. Thus, this study aimed to examine the concurrent validity, reliability, and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Q-angle in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of each goniometric measurement were determined with the use of intraclass correlations (ICCs). The correlations between goniometric (clinical) and radiography (gold standard) measurements of Q-angle were assessed for concurrent validity. The intra-rater reliabilities of goniometric assessments in the supine and standing positions of the Q-angle were 0.90 and 0.96, respectively. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC95) were 1.18 and 3.27 degrees for supine assessment and 0.87 and 2.40 degrees for standing assessment, respectively. The inter-rater reliabilities of goniometric assessments of the supine and standing position of the Q-angle were 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. SEM and MDC95 values were 1.59 and 4.39 degrees for supine assessment and 1.19 and 3.28 degrees for standing assessment, respectively. The radiographic measure showed a strong correlation with supine goniometric assessment (p<0.05, r: 0.777) and a significantly excellent correlation with standing goniometric assessment (p<0.05, r: 0.878). According to the findings of the current study, the goniometric measurement for the Q-angle is a valid and reliable method in patients with knee OA. Also, our results suggest that the goniometric measurement, as an inexpensive and radiation-free alternative, can be used to assess the Q-angle as accurately as radiography, in clinical practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

Eymir, M., Demirkıran, N. D., Ünver, B., Erduran, M. (2025). Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of the quadriceps angle assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Volume: 11 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.1626497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Abdullah, S. S., & Rajasekaran, M. P. (2022). Do Weight-Bearing Knee Digital Radiographs Help to Track the Severity of OA? Indian J Orthop, 56(4), 664-671. doi:10.1007/s43465-021-00560-w
  2. Almeida, G. P., Silva, A. P., França, F. J., Magalhães, M. O., Burke, T. N., & Marques, A. P. (2016). Q-angle in patellofemoral pain: relationship with dynamic knee valgus, hip abductor torque, pain and function. Rev Bras Ortop, 51(2), 181-186. doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2016.01.010
  3. Belchior, A. C. G., Arakaki, J. C., Bevilaqua-Grossi, D., Reis, F. A., & Carvalho, P. T. C. (2006). Effects in the Q angle measurement with maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps muscle. Rev Bras Med Esporte, 12, 6-10. doi:10.1590/S1517-86922006000100002
  4. Chevidikunnan, M. F., Al Saif, A., Pai, H., & Mathias, L. (2015). Comparing goniometric and radiographic measurement of Q angle of the knee. Asian Biomed, 9(5), 631-636. doi:10.5372/1905-7415.0905.433
  5. de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Ostelo, R. W., Beckerman, H., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 4, 54. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-54
  6. Devan, M. R., Pescatello, L. S., Faghri, P., & Anderson, J. (2004). A prospective study of overuse knee injuries among female athletes with muscle imbalances and structural abnormalities. J Athl Train, 39(3), 263-267.
  7. Draper, C. E., Chew, K. T., Wang, R., Jennings, F., Gold, G. E., & Fredericson, M. (2011). Comparison of quadriceps angle measurements using short-arm and long-arm goniometers: correlation with MRI. PM&R, 3(2), 111-116. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.020
  8. Driban, J. B., Harkey, M. S., Barbe, M. F., Ward, R. J., MacKay, J. W., Davis, J. E., Lu, B., Price, L. L., Eaton, C. B., Lo, G. H., & McAlindon, T. E. (2020). Risk factors and the natural history of accelerated knee osteoarthritis: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 21(1), 332. doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03367-2
  9. Ekim, A. A., Hamarat, H., & Musmul, A. (2017). Relationship between q-angle and articular cartilage in female patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: ultrasonographic and radiologic evaluation. Arch Rheumatol, 32(4), 347-352. doi:10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6145
  10. Eymir, M., Unver, B., & Karatosun, V. (2024). Reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the hand-held dynamometry for the assessment of knee muscle strength in patients with revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 105(1), 34-39. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.002
  11. Eymir, M., Yuksel, E., Unver, B., & Karatosun, V. (2021). Hand-held dynamometry in the inpatient care setting after total knee arthroplasty: reliability of static knee strength measurements. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 100(6), 570-575. doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000001592
  12. Hunter, D. J., Sharma, L., & Skaife, T. (2009). Alignment and osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91(Supplement 1), 85-89. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01409
  13. Kocak, F. U., Unver, B., Karatosun, V., & Bakirhan, S. (2009). Associations between radiographic changes and function, pain, range of motion, muscle strength and knee function score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Phys Ther Sci, 21(1), 93-97. doi:10.1589/jpts.21.93
  14. Lee Rodgers, J., & Nicewander, W. A. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am Stat, 42(1), 59-66. doi:10.1080/00031305.1988.10475524
  15. Lim, B. W., Hinman, R. S., Wrigley, T. V., & Bennell, K. L. (2008). Varus malalignment and its association with impairments and functional limitations in medial knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 59(7), 935-942. doi:10.1002/art.23820
  16. Merchant, A. C., Fraiser, R., Dragoo, J., & Fredericson, M. (2020). A reliable Q angle measurement using a standardized protocol. Knee, 27(3), 934-939. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.001
  17. Örtqvist, M., Moström, E. B., Roos, E. M., Lundell, P., Janarv, P.-M., Werner, S., & Broström, E. W. (2011). Reliability and reference values of two clinical measurements of dynamic and static knee position in healthy children. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 19(12), 2060-2066. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1542-9
  18. Otsuki, S., Nakajima, M., Okamoto, Y., Oda, S., Hoshiyama, Y., Iida, G., & Neo, M. (2016). Correlation between varus knee malalignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24(1), 176-181. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3360-3
  19. Özgül, A., Günendi, Z., Kesikburun, S., Omaç Ö, K., & Taşkaynatan, M. A. (2013). The association between patellar alignments features and tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol, 32(7), 1017-1020. doi:10.1007/s10067-013-2222-6
  20. Rahimi, M., Alizadeh, M., Rajabi, R., & Mehrshad, N. (2012). The Comparison of innovative image processing and goniometer methods in Q angle measurement. World Appl Sci J, 18(2), 226-232. doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.02.762
  21. Sharma, L. (2021). Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med, 384(1), 51-59. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1903768
  22. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull, 86(2), 420-428. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420
  23. Shultz, S. J., Nguyen, A.-D., Windley, T. C., Kulas, A. S., Botic, T. L., & Beynnon, B. D. (2006). Intratester and intertester reliability of clinical measures of lower extremity anatomic characteristics: implications for multicenter studies. Clin J Sport Med, 16(2), 155-161. doi:10.1097/00042752-200603000-00012
  24. Smith, T. O., Hunt, N. J., & Donell, S. T. (2008). The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16(12), 1068-1079. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0643-6
  25. Springer, B. A., Arciero, R. A., Tenuta, J. J., & Taylor, D. C. (2000). A prospective study of modified Ottawa ankle rules in a military population. Interobserver agreement between physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons. Am J Sports Med, 28(6), 864-868. doi:10.1177/03635465000280061501
  26. Springer, B. A., Gill, N. W., Freedman, B. A., Ross, A. E., Javernick, M. A., & Murphy, K. P. (2009). Acetabular labral tears: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination by a physical therapist, orthopaedic surgeon, and orthopaedic residents. N Am J Sports Phys Ther, 4(1), 38-45.
  27. Vassão, P. G., Silva, B. A., de Souza, M. C., Parisi, J. R., de Camargo, M. R., & Renno, A. C. M. (2020). Level of pain, muscle strength and posture: effects of PBM on an exercise program in women with knee osteoarthritis - a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci, 35(9), 1967-1974. doi:10.1007/s10103-020-02989-1
  28. Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med, 17(1), 101-110. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1 3.0.co;2-e
  29. Weiss, L., DeForest, B., Hammond, K., Schilling, B., & Ferreira, L. (2013). Reliability of goniometry-based Q-angle. PM&R, 5(9), 763-768. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj. 2013.03.023
  30. Wilson, T., & Kitsell, F. (2002). Is the Q-angle an absolute or a variable measure?: Measurement of the Q-angle over one minute in healthy subjects. Physiother, 88(5), 296-302. doi:10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61422-8
  31. Ekim, A. A., Hamarat, H., & Musmul, A. (2017). Relationship between q-angle and articular cartilage in female patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: ultrasonographic and radiologic evaluation. Arch Rheumatol, 32(4), 347-352. doi:10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6145