Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Acute effects of calf tissue flossing on ankle range of motion and performance: A randomized sham-controlled trial

Çağatay Müslüm Gökdoğan(Faculty of Health Sciences, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)0000-0001-7331-0606
Esedullah Akaras(Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Türkiye)0000-0002-0305-4632
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A single calf flossing bout may be considered a brief warm-up adjunct for short-term dorsiflexion mobility, but it was not superior to sham wrapping and did not improve single-leg jump performance within 15 minutes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tissue flossing has become a popular “quick” intervention in sports physiotherapy to enhance joint mobility acutely, yet evidence for calf-focused applications and whether mobility changes translate to unilateral performance is still limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In a randomized, sham-controlled design, 24 healthy, physically active young adults were allocated to an active floss band group (n=12) or a sham floss band group (n=12).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A single calf flossing bout may be considered a brief warm-up adjunct for short-term dorsiflexion mobility, but it was not superior to sham wrapping and did not improve single-leg jump performance within 15 minutes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ankle dorsiflexion · ankle range of motion · floss band

Abstract

Tissue flossing has become a popular “quick” intervention in sports physiotherapy to enhance joint mobility acutely, yet evidence for calf-focused applications and whether mobility changes translate to unilateral performance is still limited. The aim of the study was to examine the immediate effects of calf tissue flossing on ankle dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) range of motion (ROM), and on single-leg jump height. In a randomized, sham-controlled design, 24 healthy, physically active young adults were allocated to an active floss band group (n=12) or a sham floss band group (n=12). Participants received a single, standardized calf flossing application (active: 50% overlap and 1.5 times stretch for 2 minutes; sham: same wrap pattern with minimal tension). Outcomes (ankle PF ROM, ankle DF ROM, and single-leg jump height) were assessed pre-intervention, 2 minutes after band removal, and 15 minutes after band removal. Ankle dorsiflexion ROM increased over time (time main effect, p < .05), but the group × time interaction was not significant; therefore, the active floss band did not demonstrate statistical superiority over the sham/movement-control condition. Plantarflexion ROM and single-leg jump height did not change significantly in either group. Descriptively, dorsiflexion change scores were slightly larger in the active group at 2 min and 15 min, but these values should be interpreted cautiously. A single calf flossing bout may be considered a brief warm-up adjunct for short-term dorsiflexion mobility, but it was not superior to sham wrapping and did not improve single-leg jump performance within 15 minutes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gökdoğan, Ç. M., Akaras, E. (2026). Acute effects of calf tissue flossing on ankle range of motion and performance: A randomized sham-controlled trial. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Volume: 12 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.1879227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Bennell, K. L., Talbot, R. C., Wajswelner, H., Techovanich, W., Kelly, D. H., & Hall, A. J. (1998). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother, 44(3), 175–180. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60377-9
  2. Cheatham, S. W., & Baker, R. (2024). Tissue flossing: A commentary on clinical practice recommendations. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 19(4), 477–489. doi: 10.26603/001c.94598
  3. Cheatham, S. W., Nadeau, J., Jackson, W., & Baker, R. (2024). Effects of tissue flossing on athletic performance measures: A systematic review. Sports, 12(11), 312. doi: 10.3390/sports12110312
  4. Daneshmandi, H., Alimoradi, M., Alghosi, M., Monfaredian, O., Barati, A., & Granacher, U. (2026). The long-term effects of tissue flossing on ankle range of motion, strength, balance, and jump performance in athletes with limited ankle dorsiflexion: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, 18(1), 113. doi: 10.1186/s13102-026-01609-9
  5. de Noronha, M., Refshauge, K. M., Herbert, R. D., Kilbreath, S. L., & Hertel, J. (2006). Do voluntary strength, proprioception, range of motion, or postural sway predict occurrence of lateral ankle sprain? Br J Sports Med, 40(10), 824–828. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.029645
  6. Driller, M. W., Mackay, K., Mills, B., & Tavares, F. (2017). Tissue flossing on ankle range of motion, jump and sprint performance: A follow-up study. Phys Ther Sport, 28, 29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.08.081
  7. Driller, M. W., & Overmayer, R. G. (2017). The effects of tissue flossing on ankle range of motion and jump performance. Phys Ther Sport, 25, 20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.12.004
  8. Fong, C.-M., Blackburn, J. T., Norcross, M. F., McGrath, M., & Padua, D. A. (2011). Ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion and landing biomechanics. J Athl Train, 46(1), 5–10. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.5
  9. Huang, Y.-S., Lee, C.-L., Chang, W.-D., & Chang, N.-J. (2023). Comparing the effectiveness of tissue flossing applied to ankle joint versus calf muscle on exercise performance in female adults: An observational, randomized crossover trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 36, 171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.07.012
  10. Kalc, M., Mikl, S., Žökš, F., Vogrin, M., & Stöggl, T. (2021). Effects of different tissue flossing applications on range of motion, maximum voluntary contraction, and H-reflex in young martial arts fighters. Front Physiol, 12, 752641. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.752641
  11. Konor, M. M., Morton, S., Eckerson, J. M., & Grindstaff, T. L. (2012). Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 7(3), 279–287. PMCID: PMC3362988
  12. Konrad, A., Močnik, R., & Nakamura, M. (2021). Effects of tissue flossing on the healthy and impaired musculoskeletal system: A scoping review. Front Physiol, 12, 666129. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.666129
  13. Maemichi, T., Ogawa, Y., Wakamiya, K., Yamaguchi, R., Nagamoto, H., & Kumai, T. (2025). Elucidation of the effect of flossing on improving joint range of motion. J Sports Sci Med, 24(1), 75–83. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.75
  14. Mills, B., Mayo, B., Tavares, F., & Driller, M. (2020). The effect of tissue flossing on ankle range of motion, jump, and sprint performance in elite rugby union athletes. J Sport Rehabil, 29(3), 282–286. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0302
  15. Paravlić, A. H., Šegula, J., Drole, K., Hadžić, V., Pajek, M., & Vodičar, J. (2022). Tissue flossing around the thigh does not provide acute enhancement of neuromuscular function. Front Physiol, 13, 870498. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.870498
  16. Pisz, A., Kralová, K., Blažek, D., Gołaś, A., & Stašný, P. (2020). Meta-analyses of the effect of flossing on ankle range of motion and power jump performance. Balt J Health Phys Act, 12(2), 19–26. doi: 10.29359/bjhpa.12.2.03
  17. Powden, C. J., Hoch, J. M., & Hoch, M. C. (2015). Reliability and minimal detectable change of the weight-bearing lunge test: A systematic review. Man Ther, 20(4), 524–532. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.004
  18. Power, K., Behm, D., Cahill, F., Carroll, M., & Young, W. (2004). An acute bout of static stretching: Effects on force and jumping performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 36(8), 1389–1396. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000135775.51937.53
  19. Rodríguez-Rosell, D., Mora-Custodio, R., Franco-Márquez, F., Yáñez-García, J. M., & González-Badillo, J. J. (2017). Traditional vs. sport-specific vertical jump tests: Reliability, validity, and relationship with the legs strength and sprint performance in adult and teen soccer and basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 31(1), 196–206. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001476
  20. Sano, Y., Kawabata, M., Nakatani, K., Uchida, Y., Watanabe, Y., Tsuihiji, Y., Ishii, D., Kenmoku, T., Watanabe, H., & Takahira, N. (2024). Immediate effects of calf tissue flossing on ankle joint torque and dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy individuals: A randomized controlled crossover trial. J Sports Sci Med, 23(4), 778–786. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.778
  21. Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332
  22. Tedeschi, R., & Giorgi, F. (2024). Stretching the limits: A systematic review of tissue flossing’s impact on exercise performance. Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 40(4), 338–347. doi: 10.1016/j.orthtr.2024.08.003
  23. Vogrin, M., Novak, F., Ličen, T., Greiner, N., Mikl, S., & Kalc, M. (2020). Acute effects of tissue flossing on ankle range of motion and tensiomyography parameters. J Sport Rehabil, 30(1), 129–135. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0160