SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

A Review of Packing Technologies that Enhance Freshness of Monkey Cola Fruit

Funmilayo Ogunnaike(The Federal Polytechnic, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria)0000-0001-5259-2501
Adeosun Mayowa(The Federal Polytechnic, Ado Ekiti)0000-0003-1456-3907
Caleb Ade(The Federal Polytechnic, Ado Ekiti)0009-0000-0009-253X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review concludes that edible coatings and active packaging are the most immediately viable strategies for monkey cola freshness, while MAP and intelligent systems hold promise for commercial and export-oriented supply chains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Post-harvest losses remain a critical challenge in tropical agriculture, particularly for underutilized fruits such as monkey cola.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This review synthesizes advances in Modified Atmosphere Packaging, Active Packaging, Edible Coatings, Intelligent Packaging, and Hybrid Systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review concludes that edible coatings and active packaging are the most immediately viable strategies for monkey cola freshness, while MAP and intelligent systems hold promise for commercial and export-oriented supply chains.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Monkey cola · Packaging technologies · Edible coatings

Abstract

Post-harvest losses remain a critical challenge in tropical agriculture, particularly for underutilized fruits such as monkey cola. This review synthesizes advances in Modified Atmosphere Packaging, Active Packaging, Edible Coatings, Intelligent Packaging, and Hybrid Systems. MAP has proven effective in controlling respiration and moisture condensation, while active packaging reduces microbial spoilage through antimicrobial agents. Edible coatings derived from natural polymers provide eco-friendly barriers against water loss and contamination, and intelligent packaging introduces sensors for real-time freshness monitoring. Hybrid systems combine multiple approaches for comprehensive preservation but remain complex and costly. Despite these advances, gaps persist in scalability, affordability, and adaptation to monkey cola physiology. Future perspectives emphasize bio-based films, natural antimicrobials, low-cost sensors, and context-specific hybrid systems tailored to Nigeria’s agricultural sector. This review concludes that edible coatings and active packaging are the most immediately viable strategies for monkey cola freshness, while MAP and intelligent systems hold promise for commercial and export-oriented supply chains.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ogunnaike, F., Mayowa, A., Ade, C. (2026). A Review of Packing Technologies that Enhance Freshness of Monkey Cola Fruit. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.46592/turkager.1870786

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Abhijith R, Anagha A, and Rejeesh CR (2017). Sustainable packaging application from mycelium to substitute polystyrene: a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(1): 2139-2145.
  2. Akinyele AH, Adesemoye TE, Ogundipe AO and Ayilara OS (2020). Xylanolytic ability of bacteria isolated from corn cobs collected from dump sites in Oye-Ekiti, South West, Nigeria. FUOYE Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 5(1): 42-55.
  3. Akinbile B and Yusuf M (2011). Packaging and storage of agricultural produce in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 6(1): 34-39. Appendini P and Hotchkiss JH (2017). Active packaging technologies. Food Science and Technology International, 9(3): 173-186.
  4. Babalis A, Ntintakis I, Chaidas D and Makris A (2013). Design and development of innovative packaging for agricultural products. 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment. Procedia Technology 001-005.
  5. Baldwin EA, Hagenmaier RD and Bai J (2016). Edible coatings and films to improve food quality. CRC Press.
  6. Cagnon J and Lemoine T (2020). Ozone and modified atmosphere packaging for fruit preservation. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 162: 111-120.
  7. Caleb OJ, Mahajan PV, Al-Said FA and Opara UL (2016). Modified atmosphere packaging technology of fresh and fresh-cut produce and the microbial consequences-A review. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 6(2): 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4
  8. Chan Z, Li Y and Wang J (2025). Active packaging innovations for tropical fruit preservation. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 36: 120-135.
  9. Ene-Obong HN, Okudu HO, and Asumugha UV (2016). Nutrient and phytochemical composition of two varieties of Monkey kola (Cola parchycarpa and Cola lepidota): An underutilized fruit. Food Chemistry, 193:154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.045. PMID: 26433302
  10. Ferreira AR, Pereira CM and Vicente AA (2023). Edible coatings and future trends in active food packaging–fruits’ and traditional sausages’ shelf life increasing. Foods, 12(4): 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12040789
  11. Flo V, Mahajan PV and Caleb OJ (2025). Equilibrium modified atmosphere packaging design for fresh produce: A generalized toolbox. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 36, 100–118.
  12. Hassan B, Chatha SAS, Hussain AI, Zia KM and Akhtar N (2019). Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein-based edible films and coatings: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 109: 1095-1107.
  13. Jama R, Opara UL and Ambaw A (2026). Edible coatings for tropical fruit preservation: Functional roles and future perspectives. Food Engineering Reviews, 18(1): 45–60.
  14. Jiang T, Duan Q, Zhu J, Liu H and Long Y (2020): Starch-based biodegradable materials: Challenges and opportunities. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, 3(1): 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.11.003
  15. Kerry JP (2016). Advances in active and intelligent packaging for fresh foods. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 8: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.04.002
  16. Kumar S, Patel R and Singh A (2025). Ethylene detection technologies in intelligent packaging. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 389: 134-145.
  17. Liu Y and Chen H (2025). Hybrid packaging systems for fruit preservation: Integration of monitoring and protection. Journal of Food Engineering, 320: 110-125.
  18. Mahajan PV and Lee DS (2023). Advances in modified atmosphere packaging for fresh produce: Challenges and opportunities. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 35: 100-112.
  19. Marsh K and Bugusu B (2007). Food packaging-roles, materials, and environmental issues. Journal of Food Science, 72(3): 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301
  20. Ogundele F (2022). Post-harvest losses and food security in Nigeria: An empirical review. African Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 59(3): 77-89.
  21. Opara UL and Ambaw A (2026). Advances in edible coatings for tropical fruit preservation: Bioactive additives and functional roles. Food Engineering Reviews, 18(2): 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-026-00175
  22. Rao AS, Nair A, More SS, Roy A, More VS and Anantharaju KS (2022). A comparative study on biodegradable packaging materials: Current status and future prospects. In: Vaishnav, A., Choudhary, D.K. (eds) Microbial Polymers. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0045-6_27
  23. Realini CE and Marcos B (2019). Active and intelligent packaging systems for a modern society. Meat Science, 98(3): 404-419.
  24. Robertson GL (2016). Food packaging: Principles and practice. CRC Press.
  25. Sandhya (2016). Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: Current status and future needs. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 50(5): 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390902773080
  26. Silva FM, Gibbs PA and Hogg TA (2018). Active packaging for food applications: Current status and future trends. Food Reviews International, 24(2): 121-148.
  27. Singh S, Gaikwad KK, Lee M and Lee YS (2018). Temperature sensitive smart packaging for monitoring the shelf life of fresh beef. Journal of Food Engineering, 234: 41-49.
  28. Singh R, Gupta P and Sharma N (2025). Textile-based smart packaging for fruit freshness monitoring. Food Control, 137: 109-120.
  29. Tsironi T and Taoukis PS (2022). Application of smart packaging on the preservation of different types of perishable fruits. Foods, 11(16): 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162421
  30. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. (2025, January 15). Revolutionizing fruit packaging: Extending shelf life with low vent tech. https://scientificdiscoveries.ars.usda.gov/revolutionizing-fruit-packaging-extending-shelf-life-with-low-vent-tech
  31. Valdés A, Ramos M, Beltrán A and Garrigós MC (2017). Natural antimicrobials for food packaging applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(14): 3183-3194.
  32. Vanderroost M, Ragaert P, Devlieghere F and De Meulenaer B (2017). Intelligent food packaging: The next generation. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 14: 21-28.
  33. Wang L, Li Z, Zhang X, Li D, Zeng C, Li T, Zou L, Luo Z, Yang X, Li L (2026). Biomimetic thermal regulation in intelligent fruit packaging: A fungal hypothermia-bioinspired hydrogel coating. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 55: 101740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2026.101740
  34. Yam KL, Takhistov PT and Miltz J (2016). Intelligent packaging: Concepts and applications. Journal of Food Science, 70(1): R1-R10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb09052.x
  35. Zhang X, Li M and Zhao Y (2023). Application of smart packaging in fruit and vegetable preservation: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 22(3): 1456-1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13145
  36. Zhang X, Li H and Zhou Y (2025). Sensor-AI integration in intelligent packaging for fruits and vegetables. Food Engineering Reviews, 17(2): 145-160.